Improving triage accuracy of hospitalization and discharge decisions in the emergency department

The initial severity triage of patients in the emergency department (ED) is implemented differently worldwide, according to the characteristics of each country. However, better classification methods are being studied due to various problems with the current system. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of patients’ severity assessment in a new way that gives appropriate values to factors that can be obtained in the ED.We collected data from 158,246 patients who visited the ED from 01 January 2016, to 31 December 2020. Using the appropriate values of various factors obtained using the Rasch analysis method, the cut-off values for predicting hospitalization and discharge at the ED of patients were determined. Furthermore, using artificial intelligence, the patients who were hospitalized and discharged from the ED were classified and compared with the results of the Rasch analysis. The accuracy of the algorithms was analyzed as a combination of factors that could be obtained during the initial stage of the patient’s visits. The area under the curve (AUC) value for the prediction of hospitalization and discharge by a combination of factors immediately obtained from the visit was 0.611. In addition, using the factors that could be obtained after a certain period, the AUC value of hospitalization and discharge prediction was 0.767. The results of analysis using artificial intelligence were similar to or slightly higher than the AUC value of the Rasch analysis. The prediction of hospitalization and discharge in the ED using clinical parameters with Rasch analysis can be used for medical assistance, which is expected to help in the efficient operation of the ED.

Triage; Severity; Rasch analysis; Hospitalization; Emergency; Patient characteristics

[1] Chen W, Linthicum B, Argon NT, Bohrmann T, Lopiano K, Mehrotra A, et al. The effects of emergency department crowding on triage and hospital admission decisions. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020; 38: 774–779.

[2] Kuriyama A, Urushidani S, Nakayama T. Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2017; 34: 703–710.

[3] Tomyn AJ, Stokes MA, Cummins RA, Dias PC. A Rasch analysis of the personal well-being index in school children. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2020; 43: 110–119.

[4] Ambrosio L, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Ayala A, Forjaz MJ. Rasch analysis of the living with chronic illness scale in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurology. 2020; 20: 346.

[5] Medvedev O, Turner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Siegert RJ. Rasch analysis of the UK functional assessment measure in patients with complex disability after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 50: 420–428.

[6] Liang W, Yao J, Chen A, Lv Q, Zanin M, Liu J, et al. Early triage of critically ill COVID-19 patients using deep learning. Nature Communications. 2020; 15: 3543.

[7] Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi MK, Brown DFM, Camargo CA, Hasegawa K. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models. Critical Care. 2019; 23: 64.

[8] Levin S, Toerper M, Hamrock E, Hinson JS, Barnes S, Gardner H, et al. Machine-learning-based electronic triage more accurately differentiates patients with respect to clinical outcomes compared with the emergency severity index. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 71: 565–574.e2.

[9] Azeredo TRM, Guedes HM, Rebelo de Almeida RA, Chianca TCM, Martins JCA. Efficacy of the Manchester Triage System: a systematic review. International Emergency Nursing. 2015; 23: 47–52.

[10] Jesus APS, Okuno MFP, Campanharo CRV, Lopes MCBT, Batista REA. Manchester Triage System: assessment in an emergency hospital service. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021; 74: e20201361.

[11] Moon SH, Shim JL, Park KS, Park CS. Triage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean triage and acuity scale. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0216972.

[12] Caramello V, Marulli G, Reimondo G, Fanto’ F, Boccuzzi A. Inpatient disposition in overcrowded hospitals: is it safe and effective to use reverse triage and readmission screening tools for appropriate discharge?An observational prospective study of an Italian II level hospital. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019; 73: e13281.

[13] Iversen AKS, Kristensen M, Østervig RM, Køber L, Sölétormos G, Lundager Forberg J, et al. A simple clinical assessment is superior to systematic triage in prediction of mortality in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2019; 36: 66–71.

[14] Fernandes CM, Wuerz R, Clark S, Djurdjev O. How reliable is emergency department triage? Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1999; 34: 141–147.

[15] Tam HL, Chung SF, Lou CK. A review of triage accuracy and future direction. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2018; 18: 58.

[16] Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2010; 107: 892–898.

[17] Kumar A, Lakshminarayanan D, Joshi N, Valid S, Bhoi S, Deorari A. Triaging the triage: reducing waiting time to triage in the emergency department at tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2019; 36: 558–563.

[18] Dong Sl, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Colman I, Blitz S, Holroyd BR, et al. Emeregncy triage: comparing a novel computer triage program with standard triage. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2005; 12: 502–507.

[19] Rutschmann OT, Hugli OW, Marti C, Grosgurin O, Geissbuhler A, Kossovsky M, et al. Reliability of the revised Swiss emergency triage scale: computer simulation study. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 25: 264–269.

[20] Montandon DS, de Souza-Junior VD, Dos Santos Almeida RG, Marchi-Alves LM, Costa Mendes IA, de Godoy S. How to perform prehospital emergency telephone triage: a systematic review. Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2019; 26: 104–110.

[21] Duke T. New WHO guidelines on emergency triage and assessment and treatment. Lancet. 2016; 387: 721–724.

[22] Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Kuntawong P. A short screening tool for borderline personality disorder (Short-Bord): validated by Rasch analysis. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019; 44: 195–199.

[23] Ahn E, Kim J, Rahman K, Baldacchino T, Baird C. Development of a risk predictive scoring system to identify patients at risk of representation to emergency department: a retrospective population-based analysis in Australia. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e021323.