Signa Vitae,2024,20(11):49-55 DOI:10.22514/sv.2024.143
Original Research
Thrombus prevalence and risk factors in critically ill pediatric patients
Aylin Akti1,*,, Ozden Ozgur Horoz2, Dincer Yildizdas2, Merve Misirlioglu2, Faruk Ekinci2, Goksel Leblebisatan3, Sevcan Tug Bozdogan4

1Department of Pediatrics, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01330 Adana, Türkiye

2Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01330 Adana, Türkiye

3Department of Pediatric Hematology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01330 Adana, Türkiye

4Department of Medical Genetics, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01330 Adana, Türkiye

*Corresponding Author(s):aktitugrul@gmail.com (Aylin Akti)

History Submitted: 03 March 2024 | Accepted: 06 June 2024 | Published: 08 November 2024
Copyright:  ©2024  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

We aimed to ascertain the prevalence of venous and arterial thrombus, potential thrombosis-inducing factors, and underlying medical conditions in critically ill pediatric patients admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit. We included patients who were admitted to our tertiary pediatric intensive care unit for 24 hours between June 2016 and June 2021 and had venous or arterial thrombosis confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography. Thirty patients with confirmed thrombosis who underwent Doppler ultrasonography and thirty patients without thrombosis, matched based on age and gender, were included in the control group. The female gender accounted for 63.3% of the patients in the thrombosis group. There was no significant gender difference between the thrombosis group and the control group. Age (in months), height, weight, and body mass index measurements were similar in both groups. The most common reason for hospitalization in the thrombosis group was post-operative care (n = 7; 23.3%). Thrombosis typically occurred after a mean of 6.9 ± 4.9 days of hospitalization. Coagulation parameters, Protein C, Protein S, homocysteine levels, pediatric mortality index (PIM), pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM-2), and Braden Q scores evaluating pressure ulcersdid not differ significantly between the two groups. Eleven patients in the thrombosis group were screened for the prothrombin 20210A mutation, with all results being normal; eleven patients in the patient group were tested for Factor V Leiden mutation, and nine patients in the control group had no mutation. The thrombosis group had a significantly lower rate of mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis. Factors such as trauma, infection, heart failure, malignancy, history of chemotherapy, immobilization, presence of central catheter, history of surgical intervention, family history, and nephrotic syndrome were not significantly associated with thrombosis development. Central venous and arterial catheterization was identified as the most crucial acquired risk factor for thrombosis.

Keywords:Arterial;Pediatric intensive care;Thrombosis;Venous
PDF(970.96 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Aylin Akti, Ozden Ozgur Horoz, Dincer Yildizdas, Merve Misirlioglu, Faruk Ekinci, Goksel Leblebisatan, et al.Thrombus prevalence and risk factors in critically ill pediatric patients.Signa Vitae,2024,20(11):49-55 DOI:10.22514/sv.2024.143

1. Introduction

Although the frequency of thromboembolic events in children is less common compared to adults, it is on the rise as a complication of modern healthcare. In the general pediatric population, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) ranges from 0.14–0.21 per 10,000 children annually [1, 2]. The occurrence of VTE in hospitalized children is approximately between 0.2% and 1% [3]. A prospective study revealed that the majority of VTE cases (85%) occurred in a hospital setting, with almost all patients (98%) having at least one underlying risk factor, with a third of cases being related to central venous catheters (CVCs) [1]. There is limited data on arterial thrombotic events in children.

Many inherited and acquired risk factors can lead to thrombotic events. Indwelling catheterization, hyperviscosity syndrome, surgery, trauma, autoimmune disorders, renal diseases, congenital heart diseases, malignant diseases, chemotherapy, liver disease, thalassemia and sickle cell disease are predisposing factors associated with thrombotic events in childhood. The use of a central venous catheter (CVC) is the most significant acquired risk factor for thrombosis in children of all ages [4, 5, 6]. CVCs are necessary for children with chronic illnesses, particularly critically ill patients who require parenteral nutrition, dialysis, chemotherapy, blood transfusion or antimicrobial therapy.

While there are established guidelines for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention in adult patients, research in this area for pediatric patients is limited [7, 8]. In our study, we aim to determine the frequency of venous and arterial thrombosis, potential causes of thrombosis, and underlying conditions in critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. We anticipate that the findings of this study will provide valuable insights for future research on venous and arterial thrombosis in critically ill pediatric patients.

2. Materials and methods

Our study was designed as a retrospective and cross-sectional study. Patients admitted to our tertiary pediatric intensive care unit for more than 24 hours between June 2016 and June 2021, with venous or arterial thrombosis identified through Doppler ultrasonography, were enrolled. The medical records of 5091 patients hospitalized at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Hospital during this period were reviewed by accessing the hospital information management system. Among them, 1168 patients were excluded due to hospitalization duration of less than 24 hours. Doppler ultrasonography was conducted on 76 remaining patients based on clinical suspicion, revealing thrombosis in 30 cases. Out of these 76 patients, 46 individuals without thrombosis and 30 patients matching the age and gender criteria of the patient group were selected as the control group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.Flow diagram illustrating how to include and exclude patients.

Demographic characteristics (age, gender, height and weight), Tanner staging, laboratory parameters such as activated partial thromboplastin time test (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), fibrinogen, platelets, protein C level, protein S level, homocysteine level, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin 20210A mutation (F5 Leiden, and Prothrombin 20210A mutation were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method), pediatric mortality index (PIM), pediatric mortality risk classification (PRISM-2) and Braden Q scale scores were assessed. The Braden Q is a risk assessment tool for VTE. Patients were retrospectively screened for thrombosis risk factors including infection, trauma, malignancy, chemotherapy, surgery, central venous and arterial catheter, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, family history and previous deep vein thrombosis.

The statistical analysis of the data was conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) Categorical measurements were presented as numerical values and percentages, while continuous measurements were described in terms of mean, standard deviation, median and range. presented as numerical values and percentages, while continuous measurements were described in terms of mean, standard deviation, median and range. For the comparison of continuous measurements among different groups, the distribution normality was assessed through the Shapiro-Wilk test. If the numerical parameters followed a normal distribution, the independent sample t-test was employed, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical parameters that did not exhibit normal distribution. The statistical significance threshold for all tests was set at 0.05.

3. Results

Thirty pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit with thrombus detected by Doppler ultrasonography were compared with 30 control children without thrombus (Fig. 1). The female sex ratio was 63.3% in the thrombosis group and 43.3% in the control group (p = 0.121). The mean age was 84.7 ± 68.3 months in the patient group and 81.2 ± 58.1 months in the control group (p = 0.828). No significant differences were found in anthropometric measurements between the two groups. The majority of children in both groups were in Tanner Stage 1, and there were no statistically significant discrepancies in disease severity scores and Braden Q scores between the thrombosis and non-thrombosis groups (Table 1).

Table 1.Patients’ demographic information and clinical characteristics.
Thrombosis Group (n = 30)Control group (n = 30)p value
Gender, n (%)
Female19 (63.3%)13 (43.3%)0.121
Male11 (36.7%)17 (56.7%)
Age (month)
Mean ± SD84.7 ± 68.381.2 ± 58.10.828
Median6273
Min–max3–1924–216
Height (cm)
Mean ± SD111.3 ± 39.7108.2 ± 30.10.737
Median102108
Min–max60–17958–173
Weight (kg)
Mean ± SD25.5 ± 20.922.1 ± 16.90.865
Median15.718
Min–max4.4–805.2–85
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Mean ± SD17.1 ± 3.417.3 ± 3.70.855
Median16.016.8
Min–max12.2–25.811.8–29.0
PIM score
Mean ± SD2.1 ± 1.42.6 ± 1.60.187
Median22
Min–max0.3–5.20.8–6.8
PRISM-2 score
Mean ± SD2.9 ± 3.43.0 ± 2.10.930
Median1.72.4
Min–max0.1–17.00.7–8.4
Braden Q score
Mean ± SD15.4 ± 3.916.7 ± 4.00.249
Median1516
Min–max9–2311–25
Tanner stage, n (%)
Stage 120 (66.7%)23 (76.7%)
Stage 21 (3.3%)2 (6.7%)
Stage 32 (6.7%)0 (0.0%)
Stage 45 (16.7%)2 (6.7%)
Stage 52 (6.7%)3 (10.0%)
DVT prophylaxis
Yes00
No3030
SD: standard deviation; PIM: pediatric mortality index; PRISM-2: pediatric risk of mortality; DVT: deep vein thrombosis.

Venous thrombosis was observed in 73.3% (n = 22) of the patients, while arterial thrombosis was present in 26.7% (n = 8). All thromboses developed in the lower extremities in 16 patients, the upper extremities in ten patients, and the portal vein in four patients. Among the 22 individuals with venous thrombosis, 15 (68.1%) were found to have a central venous catheter. Venous thrombosis occurred in 13 lower extremities, 5 upper extremities, and 4 portal veins. Of the CVCs, 11 (73.3%) were positioned in the lower extremity, while 4 (26.6%) were in the jugular vein. The eight patients with arterial thrombosis (5 in the upper extremity and 3 in the lower extremity) all had an invasive arterial catheter (Table 2).

Table 2.Data on the type and localization of thrombosis.
Thrombosis group (n = 30)
Type of thrombosis, n (%)
Venous22 (73.3%)
Arterial8 (26.7%)
Thrombosis localization, n (%)
Upper extremity10 (33.3%)
Lower extremity16 (53.3%)
Portal vein thrombosis4 (13.3%)
Type and localization of thrombosis, n (%)
Lower extremity venous13 (43.3%)
Lower extremity arterial3 (10.0%)
Upper extremity venous5 (16.7%)
Upper extremity arterial5 (16.7%)
Portal vein thrombosis4 (13.3%)
Localization in venous thrombosis, n (%)
Upper extremity5 (27.0%)
Lower extremity13 (59.1%)
Portal vein4 (18.2%)
Presence of catheter in venous thrombosis
Yes15 (68.2%)
No7 (31.8%)
Venous Thrombosis catheter placement
Femoral11 (73.3%)
Jugular4 (26.6%)
Localization in arterial thrombosis
Upper extremity5 (62.5%)
Lower extremity3 (37.5%)
Presence of catheter in arterial thrombosis
Yes8 (100.0%)
No0 (0.0%)

No significant difference was observed between the thrombosis and control groups in terms of coagulation parameters, platelet counts, protein C, protein S, homocysteine levels, and mutations predisposing to thrombosis (Table 3). The average time of thrombosis development was 6.9 ± 4.9 days of hospitalization. There was no significant difference in the duration of stay in the intensive care unit between the thrombosis and control groups. The most prevalent reason for hospitalization in the thrombosis group was post-operative follow-up (n = 7, 23.3%). During the analysis, it was noted that patients in the thrombosis cohort underwent mechanical ventilation less frequently (15/30 vs. 24/30, p = 0.015). Hemodialysis utilization was significantly lower in patients with thrombosis (3/30 vs. 13/30, p = 0.004).

Table 3.Comparison of laboratory parameters and mutations.
Thrombosis group (n = 30)Control group (n = 30)p values
aPTT (sec)
Mean ± SD29.7 ± 9.831.8 ± 16.70.723
Median27.427.0
Min–max18.1–67.512.0–98.0
PT (sec)
Mean ± SD13.7 ± 2.814.4 ± 4.80.888
Median13.313.1
Min–max9.9–21.210.9–34.2
Fibrinogen (g/L)
Mean ± SD302.7 ± 162.4302.9 ± 108.70.995
Median255293
Min–max115–900108–508
INR
Mean ± SD1.2 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.50.882
Median1.11.1
Min–max0.9–1.90.9–3.1
Platelet (103/L)
Mean ± SD255,000 ± 139,2692,344,333 ± 1,652,1870.604
Median220,500225,000
Min–max46,000–559,0007000–583,000
Protein C
Mean ± SD54.7 ± 18.556.9 ± 20.90.797
Median52.657.9
Min–max10.8–84.620.7–78.6
Protein S
Mean ± SD74.8 ± 32.569.9 ± 10.10.703
Median78.568.2
Min–max30.6–136.055.6–85.9
Homocysteine (µmol/L)
Mean ± SD12.1 ± 11.19.3 ± 6.60.562
Median8.48.1
Min–max2.6–45.43.4–24.1
Prothrombin 20210A mutation, n (%)
Normal11 (100.0%)8 (88.9%)0.450
Heterozigot0 (0.0%)1 (11.1%)
FV Leiden mutation, n (%)
Normal11 (100%)9 (100%)
aPTT: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time; PT: Prothrombin Time; INR: International Normalized Ratio; FV Leiden: Factor V Leiden; SD: standard deviation.

There was no significant difference between the thrombosis and control groups regarding the administration of blood transfusions and vasopressor therapy. Moreover, no statistically significant variations were found between the risk factors of trauma, infection, heart failure, malignancy, history of chemotherapy, immobilization, history of surgical intervention, family history, nephrotic syndrome presence and thrombosis development (p > 0.05). Notably, limb edema was more prevalent in the thrombosis group (73.3% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.004). Although the incidence of bruising at the thrombus site was higher in the thrombosis group compared to the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (36.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.08). Among the control group, 29/30 patients received no treatment, and with only one patient (3.3%) receiving enoxaparin sodium. Conversely, in the thrombosis group, 20/30 (66.7%) patients received enoxaparin sodium, one patient (3.3%) was administered heparin, and one patient (3.3%) with arterial thrombosis was treated with tissue plasminogen activator.

4. Discussion

Intensive care unit hospitalization and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation have been identified as significant risk factors for thromboembolic events [9]. Risk factors for thromboembolic events in intensive care unit patients include the presence of a central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation, total parenteral nutrition, underlying primary disease such as trauma or malignancy and immobilization. Central venous catheterization has been identified as the most crucial risk factor for thrombosis development among acquired and inherited risk factors [4, 5, 6]. In our study, 68.2% of 22 patients with venous thrombosis had undergone central venous catheterization, confirming the association between catheters and thrombosis.

Among patients with venous thrombosis, lower extremity thrombosis was found in 81.8% of those with femoral catheters and upper extremity thrombosis in 75% of those with jugular catheters. While thrombosis typically occurs more frequently in the lower extremities in adults [10], the rates of thrombosis in the lower and upper extremities are similar in children due to the common use of lower extremity catheters in pediatric intensive care units and upper extremity catheters in other units. Sandoval et al. [11] found that lower extremity thrombosis was observed in approximately 90% of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. De Angelis et al. [12] reported that all children with lower extremity thrombosis had a central venous catheter in the lower extremity.

Previous studies have shown that the incidence of arterial thrombosis is lower than venous thrombosis [6, 13]. In our study, only patients with thrombosis confirmed through Doppler ultrasonography were included, and all cases of arterial thrombosis were associated with arterial catheters. Further investigation into the frequency of thrombosis in patients with arterial catheter placement is warranted.

Gonzalez et al. [14] found no discernible age discrepancy between the patient and control groups in their exploration of risk factors associated with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Similarly, Higgerson et al. [15] did not uncover any correlation between gender and thrombosis in the pediatric intensive care unit. In our study, 63.3% of thrombosis cases manifested in female patients, while 36.7% occurred in males; nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was observed between the thrombosis and control groups with respect to gender distribution. The preponderance of individuals with thrombosis (66.7%) were classified as being in Tanner stage 1, with only 23.4% categorized as stages 4 and 5. These findings suggest a potential need to explore whether gender could serve as a predisposing factor for thrombosis prior to the onset of adolescence when its impact becomes more prominent.

A study conducted by Stokes et al. [16] in a pediatric cohort revealed a heightened incidence of thromboembolic events among individuals with elevated Body Mass Index (BMI). Despite this, our own investigation did not unveil any divergence in BMI levels between the groups with and without thrombosis. Nonetheless, a correlation between BMI and thrombosis has been documented in existing literature [16, 17]. In their study, Higgerson et al. [15] found that the majority of patients who developed thrombosis were those who had undergone surgery. In our study, we examined the reasons for hospitalization of patients with thrombosis and identified the post-operative period (23.3%) and after coronary angiography (13.3%) as the two most prevalent causes.

Many previous studies have indicated that individuals carrying the Factor V Leiden mutation are at a heightened risk of thrombosis. This particular gene is widely recognized as one of the most significant risk factors associated with thrombotic events. Another gene that influences thrombosis is the prothrombin 20210A gene [18]. Elevated homocysteine levels have been identified as a contributing risk factor in numerous thrombotic conditions. Our analysis of mutations potentially linked to coagulation disorders revealed no statistically significant variance between patients with thrombosis and those without. Levels of Protein C, protein S and homocysteine were comparable in both groups. Only one patient without thrombosis exhibited heterozygous Prothrombin 20210A mutation. While Factor V Leiden mutation was examined in eleven patients with thrombosis and nine without, no mutations were identified in any of them.

Higgerson et al. [15] discovered that patients with thrombosis exhibited significantly higher PIM scores. However, our investigation did not reveal any noteworthy difference in PIM and PRISM-2 scores between the thrombosis and non-thrombosis groups. A high Braden Q score is believed to elevate the risk of thrombosis, as evidenced by a study where the thrombosis group had a higher Braden Q score [19]. Another study reported that the likelihood of VTE increased by 29% with every one-point increment in the Braden Q total score [14]. In our study, we did not find any significant contrast in Braden Q scores between the thrombosis and non-thrombosis groups, potentially due to the limited number of patients.

While mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis typically heighten the risk of thrombosis [19], our study surprisingly revealed higher rates of these interventions in the control group. This unexpected finding may be attributed to the small sample size. Branchford et al. [20] reported that the risk of thrombosis escalates in direct correlation with the duration of hospitalization in pediatric patients. However, our study did not encompass the length of hospital stay prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Thrombosis onset occurred at an average of 6.9 ± 4.9 days of hospitalization in our patients, none of whom received DVT prophylaxis.

The main strength of our study lies in the inclusion of all pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the largest regional hospital over an extensive period. However, limitations include the retrospective nature of the study, a small number of patients with thrombosis, and incomplete monitoring of patients with central venous catheters and arterial catheters for thrombosis development. Notably, all patients with arterial thrombosis were found to have an arterial catheter. Future prospective studies are warranted to further investigate arterial thrombosis development and assess the role of arterial catheters and other risk factors.

5. Conclusions

In our study, the placement of central venous catheters (CVC) and arterial catheters emerged as the most significant acquired risk factors associated with thrombosis. Therefore, close monitoring is advised for critically ill pediatric patients in the intensive care unit who have undergone CVC and arterial catheter placement, as thrombosis may even occur in prepubertal children. It is imperative that large-scale prospective studies be conducted to explore the frequency of thrombosis and the various factors influencing its development in critically ill pediatric patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author contributions

AA, OOH, DY—designed the research study. AA, OOH, DY, MM, FE, GL, STB—performed the research; wrote the manuscript. AA, OOH, FE—analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical committee approval was received from the Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Date: 05 March 2021, meeting number: 109). Because of retrospective research, family consent was not required.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

van Ommen CH, Heijboer H, Büller HR, Hirasing RA, Heijmans HS, Peters M. Venous thromboembolism in childhood: a prospective two-year registry in the Netherlands. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2001; 139: 676–681.

[Google Scholar]

O’Brien SH, Stanek JR, Witmer CM, Raffini L. The continued rise of venous thromboembolism a cross US children’s hospitals. Pediatrics. 2022; 149: e2021054649.

[Google Scholar]

Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children’s hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 1001–1008.

[Google Scholar]

Andrew M, Marzinotto V, Pencharz P, Zlotkin S, Burrows P, Ingram J, et al. A cross-sectional study of catheter-related thrombosis in children receiving total parenteral nutrition at home. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1995; 126: 358–363.

[Google Scholar]

Massicotte MP, Dix D, Monagle P, Adams M, Andrew M. Central venous catheter related thrombosis in children: analysis of the Canadian registry of venous thromboembolic complications. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1998; 133: 770–776.

[Google Scholar]

Teja B, Bosch NA, Diep C, Pereira TV, Mauricio P, Sklar MC, et al. Complication rates of central venous catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2024; 184: 474–482.

[Google Scholar]

Braun BI, Kolbusz KM, Bozikis MR, Schmaltz SP, Abe K, Reyes NL, et al. Venous thromboembolism performance measurement in the United States: an evolving landscape with many stakeholders. To be published in Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2024. [Preprint].

[Google Scholar]

Stevens SM, Woller SC, Baumann Kreuziger L, Doerschug K, Geersing GJ, Klok FA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: compendium and review of CHEST guidelines 2012–2021. To be published in Chest. 2024. [Preprint].

[Google Scholar]

Sochet AA, Jaffray J, Branchford BR, Havlicek EE, Mosha M, Amankwah EK, et al. Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism and invasive mechanical ventilation: a report from the children’s hospital acquired thrombosis consortium. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2024; 25: e82–e90.

[Google Scholar]

Lin TL, Liu WH, Lai WH, Chen YJ, Chang PH, Chen IL, et al. The incidence and risk factors of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis without pharmacologic prophylaxis in critically ill surgical Taiwanese patients: a prospective study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2023; 25: 140–146.

[Google Scholar]

Sandoval JA, Sheehan MP, Stonerock CE, Shafique S, Rescorla FJ, Dalsing MC. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment patterns for deep venous thrombosis in hospitalized children: an increasing population at risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2008; 47: 837–843.

[Google Scholar]

DeAngelis GA, McIlhenny J, Willson DF, Vittone S, Dwyer SJ 3rd, Gibson JC, et al. Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis in the lower extremities of children in the intensive care unit. Pediatric Radiology. 1996; 26: 821–824.

[Google Scholar]

Stančiaková L, Othman M, Kubisz P. Management of venous and arterial thrombosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13: 2744.

[Google Scholar]

Gonzalez AB, Mulet YM, Song N, Loh L, Scheinker D, Shin AY, et al. Predictive ability of the Braden QD scale for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in hospitalized children. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2022; 48: 513–520.

[Google Scholar]

Higgerson RA, Lawson KA, Christie LM, Brown AM, McArthur JA, Totapally BR, et al; National Association of Childrenʼs Hospitals and Related Institutionʼs Pediatric Intensive Care Unit FOCUS group. Incidence and risk factors associated with venous thrombotic events in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2011; 12: 628–634.

[Google Scholar]

Stokes S, Breheny P, Radulescu A, Radulescu VC. Impact of obesity on the risk of venous thromboembolism in an inpatient pediatric population. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 2014; 31: 475–480.

[Google Scholar]

Torres-Ramirez RJ, Escalera C, Cushner FD, Long WJ, Rodriguez JA. The use of aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients who have morbid obesity undergoing primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. To be published in The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2024. [Preprint].

[Google Scholar]

Raptopoulou A, Michou V, Mourtzi N, Papageorgiou EG, Voyiatzaki C, Tsilivakos V, et al. Large-scale screening for factor V Leiden (G1691A), prothrombin (G20210A), and MTHFR (C677T) mutations in Greek population. Health Science Reports. 2022; 5: e457.

[Google Scholar]

Jaffray J, Mahajerin A, Branchford B, Nguyen ATH, Faustino EVS, Silvey M, et al. A new risk assessment model for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in critically ill children: a report from the children’s hospital-acquired thrombosis consortium. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2022; 23: e1–e9.

[Google Scholar]

Branchford BR, Betensky M, Goldenberg NA. Pediatric issues in thrombosis and hemostasis: the how and why of venous thromboembolism risk stratification in hospitalized children. Thrombosis Research. 2018; 172: 190–193.

[Google Scholar]