Knowledge retention when using e-learning to supplement face-to face training of first responders

Training of first responders in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of the automated external defibrillator should be designed to maximise retention of acquired knowledge. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of e-learning as a supplement to face-to-face training can lead to better knowledge retention among training participants than face-to-face training alone. A quasi-experiment was conducted between May 2017 and February 2018. Both the intervention and control groups participated in two days of training (totalling ten hours). The intervention group also participated in an additional 15-minute e-learning course. The knowledge of all participants was assessed immediately after the training and six months after the training with a paper-based test. The use of an e-learning course to supplement face-to-face instruction resulted in a significant positive improvement in knowledge retention. After a period of six months, a statistically significant decrease in test scores was observed in the control group (p = 0.005), in contrast to the intervention group (p = 0.114). The use of e-learning as a supplement to face-to-face training could be a valid approach to improve knowledge retention among course participants.

E-learning; supplementation; First responder; Knowledge retention; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Automated external defibrillator

[1] Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63–81.

[2] Hansen SM, Brøndum S, Thomas G, Rasmussen SR, Kvist B, Christensen A, et al. Home care providers to the rescue: a novel first-responder programme. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0141352.

[3] Oving I, Masterson S, Tjelmeland IBM, Jonsson M, Semeraro F, Ringh M, et al. First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2019; 27: 112.

[4] Chung CH, Siu AYC, Po LLK, Lam CY, Wong PCY. Comparing the effectiveness of video self-instruction versus traditional classroom in-struction targeted at cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills for laypersons: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2010; 16: 165–170.

[5] Ringh M, Jonsson M, Nordberg P, Fredman D, Hasselqvist-Ax I, Håkansson F, et al. Survival after public access defibrillation in stockholm, Sweden-a striking success. Resuscitation. 2015; 91: 1–7.

[6] Rørtveit S, Meland E. First responder resuscitation teams in a rural Nor-wegian community: sustainability and self-reports of meaningfulness, stress and mastering. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2010; 18: 25.

[7] Roberts A, Nimegeer A, Farmer J, Heaney DJ. The experience of community first responders in co-producing rural health care: in the liminal gap between citizen and professional. BMC Health Services Research. 2014; 14: 460.

[8] Ericsson K. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine. 2004; 79: S70–S81.

[9] Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, Fudala MJ, Wade LD, Feinglass J, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006; 21: 251–256.

[10] Alkhalaileh M, Hasan AAH, Al-Rawajfah O. Evaluate the effectiveness of clinical simulation and instructional video training on the nursing students’ knowledge about cardio-pulmonary resuscitation: comparative study. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5: 172–178.

[11] Koh LC. Practice-based teaching and nurse education. Nursing Standard. 2002; 16: 38–42.

[12] Whitten P, Ford DJ, Davis N, Speicher R, Collins B. Comparison of face-to-face versus interactive video continuing medical education delivery modalities. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 1998; 18: 93–99.

[13] Dankbaar MEW, Roozeboom MB, Oprins EAPB, Rutten F, van Mer-rienboer JJG, van Saase JLCM, et al. Preparing residents effectively in emergency skills training with a serious game. Simulation in Healthcare. 2017; 12: 9–16.

[14] Hards A, Davies S, Salman A, Erik-Soussi M, Balki M. Management of simulated maternal cardiac arrest by residents: didactic teaching versus electronic learning. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2012; 59: 852–860.

[15] Yiu SHM, Spacek AM, Pageau PG, Woo MYC, Curtis Lee A, Frank JR. Dissecting the contemporary clerkship: theory-based educational trial of videos versus lectures in medical student education. AEM Education and Training. 2019; 4: 10–17.

[16] Perkins GD, Fullerton JN, Davis-Gomez N, Davies RP, Baldock C, Stevens H, et al. The effect of pre-course e-learning prior to advanced life support training: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 877–881.

[17] Moreno R, Mayer R. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review. 2007; 19: 309–326.

[18] Al-Samarraie H, Selim H, Teo T, Zaqout F. Isolation and distinctiveness in the design of e-learning systems influence user preferences. Interactive Learning Environments. 2017; 25: 452–466.

[19] WebSoft Ltd. CourseLab: Free CourseLab 2.4. 2021. Available at: http: //www.courselab.com/ (Accessed: 01 September 2021).

[20] Boet S, Bould MD, Pigford AA, Rössler B, Nambyiah P, Li Q, et al. Retention of basic life support in laypeople: mastery learning vs. time-based education. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2017; 21: 362–377.

[21] Zieber M, Sedgewick M. Competence, confidence and knowledge retention in undergraduate nursing students—a mixed method study. Nurse Education Today. 2018; 62: 16–21.

[22] Krogh LQ, Bjørnshave K, Vestergaard LD, Sharma MB, Rasmussen SE, Nielsen HV, et al. E-learning in pediatric basic life support: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study. Resuscitation. 2015; 90: 7–12.

[23] Mohd Saiboon I, Jaafar MJ, Ahmad NS, Nasarudin NMA, Mohamad N, Ahmad MR, et al. Emergency skills learning on video (ESLOV): a single-blinded randomized control trial of teaching common emergency skills using self-instruction video (SIV) versus traditional face-to-face (FTF) methods. Medical Teacher. 2014; 36: 245–250.

[24] Thorne CJ, Lockey AS, Bullock I, Hampshire S, Begum-Ali S, Perkins GD. E-learning in advanced life support—an evaluation by the Resuscitation Council (UK). Resuscitation. 2015; 90: 79–84.

[25] Moon H, Hyun HS. Nursing students’ knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19: 414.

[26] Creutzfeldt J, Hedman L, Felländer-Tsai L. Effects of pre-training using serious game technology on CPR performance—an exploratory quasi-experimental transfer study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2012; 20: 79.

[27] Alam F, Boet S, Piquette D, Lai A, Perkes CP, LeBlanc VR. E-learning optimization: the relative and combined effects of mental practice and modeling on enhanced podcast-based learning—a randomized controlled trial. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2016; 21: 789–802.

[28] Bock A, Kniha K, Goloborodko E, Lemos M, Rittich AB, Möhlhenrich SC, et al. Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anaesthesia: a randomised study. BMC Medical Education. 2021; 21: 137.

[29] George PP, Zhabenko O, Kyaw BM, Antoniou P, Posadzki P, Saxena N, et al. Online digital education for postregistration training of medical doctors: systematic review by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; 21: e13269.

[30] Hsieh PAJ, Cho V. Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: the case of instructor—student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education. 2011; 57: 2025–2038.