The effect of posture modification during continuous one-handed chest compression: A pilot study using in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest simulation

Background. We modified the posture of the one-handed chest compression (MOHCC) as follows: first, the axis of the rescuer’s compression hand was adjusted to the lower half of the patient’s sternum; second, the opposite hand was wrapped around the elbow joint of the rescuer’s compression arm. This study evaluated the effect of the MOHCC on the mean chest compression depth (MCD) over time.

Methods. Thirty medical doctors conduct-ed 2 min of continuous MOHCC without ventilation using the in-hospital pediatric arrest model (70-cm-high bed, 25-cm-high stepstool, a pediatric manikin and a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) me-ter). The MCD and mean chest compres-sion rate (MCR) were measured at 30 s intervals using the Q-CPR review software.

Results. The MCD changed significantly over time (0–30 s, 41.9–44.7 mm; 30–60 s, 40.4–43.6 mm; 60–90 s, 39.2–42.8 mm; 90–120 s, 38.6–42.3 mm; [95% CI], P=0.002). However, it did not decrease sig-nificantly between 60–90 s and 90–120 s (P=0.173). The total decrease in MCD was 2.9 mm over a 2 min period. The MCR did not change significantly over time (0–30 s, 108.6–118.9 /min; 30–60 s, 107.9–119.1 /min; 60–90 s, 107.7–119.3 /min; 90–120 s, 107.4–119.0 /min; P=0.800).

Conclusions. Although the MCD changed significantly over a 2 min period, it did not decrease significantly after 90 s during performance of MOHCC. The MOHCC might be considered when the one-handed chest compression (OHCC) is selected as a chest compression method for cardiac ar-rest in small children.

cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac arrest, child, fatigue

1. Maconochie IK, Bingham R, Eich C, Lopez-Herce J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Rajka T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 6. Paediatric life support. Resuscitation 2015;95:223-48.

2. Oh JH, Kim SE, Kim CW, Lee DH. Should we change chest compression providers every 2 min when performing one-handed chest compressions? Emerg Med Australas 2015;27:108-12.

3. Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Sample size estimation. [Cited 14 April 2015.] Available from URL: http://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/Means.htm.

4. Baubin M, Kollmitzer J, Pomaroli A, Kraincuk P, Kranzl A, Sumann G, et al. Force distribution across the heel of the hand during simulated manual chest compression. Resuscitation 1997;35:259-63.

5. Kim MJ, Lee HS, Kim S, Park YS. Optimal chest compression technique for paediatric cardiac arrest victims. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2015;23:36.

6. Peska E, Kelly AM, Kerr D, Green D. One-handed versus two-handed chest compressions in paediatric cardio-pulmonary resuscita-tion. Resuscitation 2006;71:65-9.

7. Stevenson AG, McGowan J, Evans AL, Graham CA. CPR for children: one hand or two? Resuscitation 2005;64:205-8.

8. Udassi JP, Udassi S, Theriaque DW, Shuster JJ, Zaritsky AL, Haque IU. Effect of alternative chest compression techniques in infant and child on rescuer performance. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009;10:328-33.

9. Cheong SA, Oh JH, Kim CW, Kim SE, Lee DH. Effects of alternating hands during in-hospital one-handed chest compression: A randomised cross-over manikin trial. Emerg Med Australas 2015;27:567-72.

10. Jung GH, Oh JH, Kim CW, Kim SE, Lee DH. Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation strategies using one-handed chest compression technique for children suffering a cardiac arrest. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015. In press. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000350

11. Oh JH, Kim CW, Kim SE, Lee DH, Lee SJ. One-handed chest compression technique for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: dominant versus non-dominant hand. Emerg Med J 2015;32:544-6.