Article Data

  • Views 447
  • Dowloads 115

Original Research

Open Access

Assessment of basic life support skills among medical doctors and technicians in Belgrade emergency medical services

  • GORAN ČOLAKOVIĆ1
  • SLAĐANA ANĐELIĆ1
  • IVANA STEFANOVIĆ1
  • SNEŽANA BOGUNOVIĆ1
  • NADA EMIŠ-VANDLIK1
  • SRĐAN STOJANOVIĆ1

1Belgrade Emergency Medical Services, Serbia

DOI: 10.22514/SV141.052018.6 Vol.14,Issue 1,March 2018 pp.38-42

Published: 27 March 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): SLAĐANA ANĐELIĆ E-mail: novizivot94@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective. Our aim was to assess BLS (basic life support) skills among medical doctors (MDs) and medical technicians (MTs) who work at Belgrade Emergency Medical Ser-vices (BEMS). 

Methods. A prospective study was con-ducted between 28 September and 9 De-cember, 2016. MDs (Group 1) and MTs (Group 2) attended an accredited course in BLS at BEMS. At the end of the course the participants were given a written test consisting of 20 questions (pass rate 65%). The results were analyzed for each group i.e. profession (Group 1 and Group 2) ac-cording to the number of accurate and in-accurate answers to each question. In the end, a number of participants from each group, who answered all 20 questions cor-rectly, were identified. The results obtained, by test analysis, demonstrated the partici-pants’ acquired BLS skills.

Results. The study involved 100 partici-pants (50 in each group). All participants from Group 1 correctly answered questions number 1, 2, 3, 10, 13, 17 and 20. In Group 1 only two participants had three incorrect answers in the test. The largest number of incorrect answers was related to question number 16. Thirty-four participants in this group answered all questions correctly. All participants from Group 2 gave correct an-swers to questions number 2, 5, 9, 10 and 13. In Group 2, one participant had six in-correct answers and one participant had 5 incorrect answers. The largest number of incorrect answers was related to questions number 3 and 20. Nineteen participants from Group 2 answered all questions cor-rectly. The rate of correct answers between Group 1 and Group 2 was 19.66 : 18.91 (0.75 difference).Conclusion. The research showed a satis-factory level of knowledge in both groups. However, there is a statistically significant difference in the knowledge of MDs after the BLS course. The results obtained justify the ambitions that all healthcare profes-sionals, regardless of their qualifications, should be trained in applying BLS, both at work and as eyewitnesses.

Keywords

basic life support, knowledge/skills, doctors, medical technicians, emer-gency service

Cite and Share

GORAN ČOLAKOVIĆ,SLAĐANA ANĐELIĆ,IVANA STEFANOVIĆ,SNEŽANA BOGUNOVIĆ,NADA EMIŠ-VANDLIK,SRĐAN STOJANOVIĆ. Assessment of basic life support skills among medical doctors and technicians in Belgrade emergency medical services. Signa Vitae. 2018. 14(1);38-42.

References

1. Perkins G, Handleyc A, Koster R, Castréne M, Smytha M, Olasveengeng T, et al. on behalf of the Adult basic life support and auto-mated external defibrillation section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81–99.

2. Jensen ML, Lippert F, Hesselfeldt R, Rasmussen MB, Mogensen SS, Jensen MK, et al.The significance of clinical experience on learn-ing outcome from resuscitation training - a randomized controlled study. Resuscitation 2009;80:238-43.

3. Greif R, Lockey SA, Conaghanc P, Lippert A, De Vries W, Monsieurs GK, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Re-suscitation 2015 Section 10. Education and implementation of resuscitation. Resuscitation 2015;95:288–301.

4. Ordinance on Closer Conditions for the Implementation of Continuous Education for Health Workers and Health Associates - “Of-ficial Gazette of RS”, No. 2/2011, 23/2016. Available at: http:// www.zdravstvenisavetsrbije.gov.rs/dokumenta/zakoni/PravilnikOBliz-imUslovimaZaSprovodenjeKontinuiraneEdukacije.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2017.

5. Pavlović A. Kardiopulmonalna reanimacija odraslih. In: Kalezić N, editor. Inicijalni tretman urgentnih stanja u medicini, Inicijalni tretman urgentnih stanja u medicini, 2nd ed. Beograd: Medicinski fakultet, 2016, p. 225-77.

6. Hunyadi-Antičević S. Analiza čimbenika koji utječu na osposobljavanje polaznika organiziranog programa trajnog usavršavanja iz područja reanimacije, [disertacija]. Zagreb: Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2011.

7. Castle N, Garton H, Kenward G. Confidence vs competence: basic life support of health professionals. Br J Nurs 2007;16:664-6.

8. Smith J, Ryan K, Phelan D, McCarroll M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in non consultant hospital doctors – the Irish experi-ence. Ir J Med Sci1993;162:405-7.

9. Broster S, Cornwell L, Kaptoge S, Kelsall W. Review of resuscitation training amongst consultants and middle grade paediatricians. Resuscitation 2007;74:495-9.

10. Jensen ML, Hesselfeldt R, Rasmussen MB, Mogensen SS, Frost T, Jensen MK, et al. Newly graduated doctors' competence in manag-ing cardiopulmonary arrests assessed using a standardized Advanced Life Support (ALS) assessment. Resuscitation 2008;77:63-8.

11. Yakel ME. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills among nursing personnel: what makes the difference? Heart Lung1989;18:520-5.

12. Hulme J, Perkins GD, Baldock C, Mac Namara A. Use of advanced life support skills. Resuscitation 2003;58:59-63.

13. Terzi B, Polat Ş and Sönmez DD. Evaluation of Basic Life Support Training Program Provided for Nurses in A University Hospital. IJRMHS 2017;6(6):70-6.

14. Pavlović A, Trpković S, Kalezić N. Edukacija zdravstvenih radnika u zbrinjavanju urgentnih stanja u medicini – simulaciona me-dicina. In: Kalezić N, editor. Inicijalni tretman urgentnih stanja u medicini, 2nd ed. Beograd: Medicinski fakultet, 2016, p. 939-69.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top