Article Data

  • Views 885
  • Dowloads 110

Review

Open Access

Hyperperfusion and intracranial haemorrhage after carotid angioplasty with stenting – latest review

  • SERGEJA KOZAR1
  • MIRAN JEROMEL2

1,Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy University Medical Centre Ljubljana

2,Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Clinical Institute for Radiology

DOI: 10.22514/SV92.112014.2 Vol.9,Issue 2,November 2014 pp.9-14

Published: 03 November 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): SERGEJA KOZAR E-mail: sergeja.kozar@gmail.com

Abstract

The number of endovascular procedures is constantly increasing. As far as the carotid artery is concerned, carotid angio-plasty with stenting (CAS) is an alternative to surgical treatment (carotid endarterectomy; CEA).

Two major devastating complications can occur after both procedures – cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). 

The incidence of CHS and ICH in CAS is fortunately low but overall morbidity and mortality remains high.

This latest review re-evaluates the pathogenesis, clinical features, risk factors and diagnostic procedures as well as mana-gement of these two complications.

Keywords

carotid artery stenting, complications, hyperperfusion syn-drome, intracranial haemorrhage

Cite and Share

SERGEJA KOZAR,MIRAN JEROMEL. Hyperperfusion and intracranial haemorrhage after carotid angioplasty with stenting – latest review. Signa Vitae. 2014. 9(2);9-14.

References

1. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM, Brooks W, et al. Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid – Artery Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363(1):11-23.

2. Geevasinga N, Morris J, Ross DL. Carotid stenting and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:301-5.

3. Narita S, Aikawa H, Nagata S, Tsutsumi M, Nii K, Yoshida H, et al. Intraprocedural Prediction of Hemorrhagic Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Artery Stenting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22(5):615-9.

4. Goldberg JB, Goodney PP, Kumbhani SR, Roth RM, Powell RJ, Likosky DS. Brain Injury After Carotid Revascularisation: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Opportunities for Improvement. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:270-86.

5. Sundt TM, Sandok BA, Whisnant JP. Carotid endarterectomy. Complications and preoperative assessement of risk. Mayo Clin Proc 1978;50:301-6.

6. Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Sfyroeras GS, Andrikopoulos V. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:1060-8.

7. Lieb M, Shah U, Hines GL. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention: a review. Cardiol Rev 2012;20(2):84-9.

8. Papanagiotou P, Roth C, Walter S, Haass A, Fassbender K, Reith W. Angiographic Evidence of Reperfusion Injury After Carotid Artery Stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60(5):7.

9. Buhk JH, Cepek L, Knauth M. Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Complicating Carotid Stenting Should Be Distinguished from Hyper-perfusion Syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1508-13.

10. Ogasawara Y, Ogasawara K, Suzuki T, Yamashita T, Kuroda H, Chida K, et al. Preoperative 123i-iomazenil SPECT imaging predicts cerebral hyperperfusion following endarterectomy for unilateral cervical internal carotid stenosis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;2(1):77-87.

11. Abou-Chebl A, Yadav JS, Reginelli JP, Bajzer C, Bhatt D, Krieger DW. Intracranial Hemorrhage and Hyperperfusion Syndrome Following Carotid Artery Stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(9):1596–601.

12. Pieniazek P, Tekieli L, Musialek P, Kablak Ziembicka A, Przewlocki T, Motyl R, et al. Carotid artery stenting according to the tailored-CAS algorithm is associated with a low complication rate at 30 days: data from the TARGET-CAS study. Kardiol Pol 2012;70(4):378-86.

13. Mc Donald RJ, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Intracranial Hemorrhage Is Much More Common After Carotid Stenting Than After Endarterectomy. Evidence From the National Inpatient Sample. Stroke 2011;42:2782-7.

14. Dong H, Jiang X, Peng M, Wu H, Hui R, Xu B, et al. Comparison of the safety of simultaneous bilateral carotid artery stenting versus uni-lateral carotid artery stenting: 30-day and 6-month results. Chin Med J 2012;125(6):1010-5.

15. Choi BS, Park JW, Shin JE, Lu PH, Kim JK, Lee DH, et al. Outcome Evaluation of Carotid Stenting in High Risk Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Near Occlusion. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:309-16.

16. Katano H, Mase M, Sakurai K, Miyachi S, Yamada K. Revaluation of collateral pathways as escape routes from hyperemia/hyperperfusion following surgical treatment for carotid stenosis. Acta Neurochir 2012;154(12):2139–49.

17. Maas MB, Kwolek CJ, Hirsch JA, Jaff MR, Rordorf GA. Clinical risk predictors for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarte-rectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84(5):569-72.

18. Shindo A, Kawai N, Kawakita K, Kawanishi M, Tamiya T, Nagao S. Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Carotid Artery Stenting Without Evidence of Hyperperfusion in Positron Emission Tomography. Interv Neurorad 2007;13:191-9.

19. Kakumoto K, Matsumoto S, Nakahara I, Watanabe Y, Fukushima Y, Yoshikiyo U, et al. Rapid formation of Cerebral Microbleedings after Carotid Artery Stenting Cerebrovasc Dis Extra [serial online] 2012 March [citied 2013 Jan 14]; 2:9-16. Available from: URL:http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341129/pdf/cee-0002-0009.pdf

20. Pennekamp CW, Immink RV, den Ruijter HM, Kappelle LJ, Ferrier CM, Bots ML, et al. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Can Predict the Onset of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Endarterectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;34:314-21.

21. Pennekamp CW, Tromp SC, Ackerstaff RG, Bots ML, Immink RV, Spiering W, et al. Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy with transcranial Doppler. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43(4):371-6.

22. Schoknecht K, Gabi S, Ifergane G, Friedman A, Shelef I. Detection of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Endarterectomy with CT perfusion. J Neuroimaging (in press)

23. Vasquez RA, Waters MF, Skowlund CJ, Mocco J, Hoh BL. Computed tomographic perfusion imaging of non-hemorrhagic cerebral hyper-perfusion and reversal following medical treatment after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4(3):2.

24. Nanba T, Ogasawara K, Nishimoto H, Fujiwara S, Kuroda H, Sasaki M, et al. Postoperative white matter damage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion and cognitive impairment after carotid endarterectomy: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;34(5-6):358-67.

25. Reddy U, Smith M. Anesthetic management of endovascular procedures for cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012;25(4):486-92.

26. Bouri S, Thapar A, Shalhoub J, Jayasooriya G, Fernando A, Franklin IJ, et al. Hypertension and the Post-carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2011;41:229-37.

27. Naylor AR, Sayers RD, McCarthy MJ, Bown MJ, Nasim A, Dennis MJ, et al. Closing the Loop: A 21-year Audit of Strategies for Preventing Stroke and Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013;46(2):161-70.

28. Newman JE, Ali M, Sharpe R, Bown MJ, Sayers RD, Naylor AR. Changes in Middle Cerebral Artery Velocity after Carotid Endarterectomy do not Identify Patients at High-risk of Suffering Intracranial Haemorrhage or Stroke due to Hyperperfusion Syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013 Jun;45(6):562-71.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2021) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top