Signa Vitae. 2020; 16(2): 8-13. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0045
Review

Pediatric Anesthesia Techniques during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Alexander Trujillo Mejía1,2,3,*,, Fernando Arango1,2, Cristina Osorio3, Federico Ocampo2,3, Lina Melo2,3, Leonardo Gil1,2,3

1Departmento Clínico Quirúrgico, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia

2Departmento Clínico Quirúrgico, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia

3Departmento de Anestesiología, Hospital Infantil de la Cruz Roja, Manizales, Colombia

*Corresponding Author(s):alexander.trujillo@ucaldas.edu.co (Alexander Trujillo Mejía)

History Submitted: 09 June 2020 | Accepted: 22 July 2020 | Published: 28 October 2020
Copyright:  ©2020  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

The pediatric population is a contagion fuel for SARS CoV-2, putting health care workers at risk. Exposure to respiratory droplets and aerosols are a major cause of disease transmission during airway procedures. Crying, coughing, laryngospasm, airway obstruction and hypoxia, which are more frequent in children than adults, directly or indirectly increase aerosol production and hence the risk of transmission to health workers. We present recommendations for the perioperative management of children suspected or confirmed positive for COVID-19, with the aim of reducing the risk of infection in these patients and in the healthcare team.

Keywords:COVID-19;Pediatric anesthesia;SARS CoV-2;Aerosol box, Airway
PDF(193.72 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Alexander Trujillo Mejía, Fernando Arango, Cristina Osorio, Federico Ocampo, Lina Melo, Leonardo Gil. Pediatric Anesthesia Techniques during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Signa Vitae. 2020; 16(2): 8-13. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0045

What do we know about this topic ?

Adherence to recommendations and management guidelines when approaching pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic reduces disease transmission.

What does the study contribute ?

This study provides recommendations on pediatric anesthesia techniques that decrease aerosol production and improve the safety of patients and healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

1. Introduction

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affects all ages [1]. Children have a lower incidence (0.9% - 1.2%) and a moderate clinical picture [2]. In Wuhan, the attack rate was 12.3% in children and it has been estimated the pediatric population represents between 1.2 and 2% of all infected cases [3]. In Spain, 60% of infected children required hospitalization, of which 9.7% was in the Intensive Care Unit. In Colombia, 2 deaths have been reported in pediatric patients with cardiovascular disease, although most have a good prognosis [4, 5].

At the beginning of the illness, infected children have fever, cough, headache, runny nose, vomiting and diarrhea. One week after initiation, they may develop symptoms of systemic toxicity such as general malaise, asthenia and decreased oral intake. The clinical condition in some children may rapidly worsen and cause respiratory failure. These severe cases can end in septic shock, metabolic acidosis and coagulation disorders. However, most children recover within 1 to 2 weeks [4, 5]. The leukocyte value is generally normal and lymphopenia is not evident in most cases, suggesting a lower immune response in SARS CoV-2 infection [5].

The pediatric population has a similar probability of viral transmission as adults [6], even if they are asymptomatic [5] and must undergo intense preventive measures [6]. Therefore, the healthcare team should adopt a high index of suspicion, especially during the airway approach. This is because children can be contagious even in the absence of symptoms.

China and Spain reported more than 3,300 and 12,298 infected healthcare workers, respectively, as of March 2020 [7, 8]. The United Kingdom reported 4,605 cases in mid-April [7], and 678 cases were reported in Colombia on May 9 [9].

Crying, coughing, laryngospasm, airway obstruction and hypoxia are more frequent in children than adults and can directly or indirectly increase aerosol production and hence the risk of transmission to health professionals. This article will review pediatric anesthesia techniques during the COVID-19 pandemic with the aim of avoiding the above situations and thus improving the safety of patients and health workers.

2. Transmission of the virus

Spread of the SARS CoV-2 virus occurs through respiratory droplets and contact routes [10]. The respiratory droplets are larger than 5μm in diameter and subject to gravitational force, so their dispersion reaches up to one or two meters away. Transmission by contact occurs because the virus remains on surfaces for hours to days, thereby being a potential source of infection [11].

Air transport occurs when particles smaller than 5μm in diameter (aerosols) circulate in the air for long periods of time and for distances of greater than 2 meters [12]. The virions in these particles are absorbed by the respiratory mucosa and even by the conjunctiva. Procedures involving the airway can generate aerosols that carry the virus across distances. These include tracheal intubation and extubation, tracheostomies, cricothyroidotomies, positive pressure ventilation (PPV), open tracheal aspiration, bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum induction and modes of non-invasive ventilation [13]. The WHO recommends drop and contact precautions on a routine basis and aerosol precautions for these procedures [14].

3. Air exchange in the room

Whenever possible, airway manipulation should be performed in a negative pressure room with the doors closed. However, rapid renewal of air in the room (more than 12 times per hour) is more important than pressurization of the room [13].

4. Personal protection equipment

The personal protection elements (PPE) necessary to carry out these procedures consist of: gloves, long-sleeved anti-fluid gown, eye protection that can be glasses or a mask (personal glasses are insufficient), FFP3 mask and gloves [10] (Table 1). It is highly recommended to use checklists for setting and removing these elements. In addition, the principles of infection prevention and control must be followed.

Table 1.Recommendations for safe anesthetic technique for children with COVID-19.
Before the procedure
Sanitation of hands.
Adequate use of personal protection elements.
If possible, perform the procedure in a room with more than 12 air changes per hour and with negative pressure.
Reduce the number of people in the room.
Enlist aerosol box.
Have all the devices for airway management checked; package and label all medications.
Have HEPA filters in place (risk of hypercapnia in young children).
salbutamol in bronchial hyper-reactivity or recent respiratory symptoms.
Premedication: oral or venous anxiolytic, atropine to decrease oral secretions (caution), Venous cannulation before entering the operating room.
Use of cognitive aids.
During the procedure
Put aerosol box on the patient’s head, cover the distal hole of the box on the patient’s abdomen.
Conventional monitoring.
Pre-oxygenation: FiO2 80%. Achieve exhaled O2 concentration of 70Intravenous induction of fast or fast modified sequence.
Avoid giving positive pressure ventilation through a face mask.
Video laryngoscope or conventional laryngoscope according to expertise.
Fix the OTT very well to the patient and to the anesthetic circuit.
Protective mechanical ventilation: 6 ml/Kg, RR 35/min or less according to age, plateau pressure less than 30cmH2O, moderately elevated levels of PEEP (5cm H2O) and up should be titrated.
Recruitment with IS pressure of 30 - 40 cm H2O for 15 - 20 seconds.
Using cognitive aids.
After the procedure
Avoid disconnections from the circuit.
Extubation:
Avoid cough and laryngospasm.
Preferably do it with the deep patient, with spontaneous ventilation and in lateral decubitus.
Administer venous lidocaine 3 minutes before. Consider dexmedetomidine.
Have a proper extubation MAC.
Guarantee good SpO2 and adequate respiratory effort.
Inside the aerosol box.
Immediately put on the surgical mask after extubation.
Recover in surgery room.
Caution when removing personal protection elements.
Use cognitive aids.
Abbreviations: HEPA: High Efficiency Particulate Air; FiO2: Inspirated fraction of oxygen. OTT: Orotracheal Tube; RR: Respiratory Rate; PEEP: Positive Pressure at End of Expiration; SpO2: Pulse Oximetry. Source: Authors.

5. Mechanical barriers against aerosols

The WHO recommends using mechanical barriers against aerosols. The aerosol box has been rapidly introduced as an effective barrier method. The part that covers the patient’s abdomen allows aerosols to escape and therefore it is recommended that it be covered. Other forms of protection involving plastic covers with controlled access have also been suggested [15].

6. Preparation

Before taking the patient to the surgery room, different devices of all sizes should be prepared for airway management according to age. Packaged and labeled medications must be available. Also recommended are an intubation guide, protected Kelly forceps, and a cap for the end of the tracheal tube. The suction system must be closed to avoid production of aerosols.

7. Use of filters in the anesthetic circuit

The HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) antiviral filters placed in the anesthetic circuit protect those who manipulate the airway. Although its use is not a problem in adults and older children, in neonates and young infants the dead space produced by the filter can cause significant hypoventilation with severe hypercapnia, as has already been reported [16]. The filter must be chosen according to its dead space and the required tidal volume range (VC). A filter with a 10 mL dead space and a VC range between 30 and 200 mL may be too large for a 1000 g premature infant, but too small for a 30 kg patient with a 240 mL VC. If the filter is too big for the size of the infant it can lead to hypercapnia and intraventricular hemorrhage. Alternatively, a small filter used for a larger infant can cause increased airway resistance [17]. Therefore, it is important to always monitor the exhaled CO2 and airway pressures during use.

8. Premedication

About 70% of children experience significant stress and anxiety prior to surgery [18]. Negative anticipation before the procedure can generate psychomotor agitation, crying, screaming and other behaviors that force healthcare personnel to limit the patient’s movements, thereby exposing themselves to droplets and respiratory aerosols. Adequate preoperative anxiolysis can therefore decrease the risk of contagion in health care workers. Premedication of the child via oral or intravenous routes (if available) before transfer to the operating room is recommended. Midazolam or clonidine are effective as preoperative anxiolytics in children [18]. The nasal route should be avoided because it can cause coughing or sneezing and the generation of aerosols [19]. Parental presence during anesthetic induction is not recommended due to the risk of contagion for parents and health care workers, as well as the need for additional PPEs that are scarce due to the pandemic [19]. Atropine is useful in preventing bradycardia and decreasing oral and respiratory secretions before anesthetic induction. However, it can thicken the secretions and predispose to atelectasis. In patients with upper airway infection or a history of bronchial hyper-reactivity, salbutamol premedication with a spacer chamber is useful to prevent aerosol formation [20].

9. Venous cannulation

It is important to have patent venous access before entering the operating room. Intravenous induction is faster and reduces the time of exposure to respiratory droplets and aerosols generated during the tracheal intubation process [21]. However, attempts at venous cannulation can trigger drop-generating behaviors in the child. There are some alternatives that, alone or in combination, improve the safety of the procedure. The “gold standar” is the application of topical anesthetic (EMLA) from 30 to 60 minutes before puncture. Videos, games and devices that generate vibration and cold (BUZZY) are also useful [22, 23].

10. Pre-oxygenation

Children, especially neonates and infants, are prone to hypoxemia during airway procedures, even in the absence of cardiorespiratory pathologies. Bradycardia and secondary circulatory collapse are more likely if respiratory infections are ongoing. Despite adequate pre-oxygenation, their high oxygen consumption and low residual lung capacity predisposes children to alveolar collapse. To prevent hypoxemia, the use of high-flow nasal cannulas that provide apneic oxygenation during intubation has been suggested. These cannulas have been useful in adults, but their utility in the pediatric population is disputed for several reasons. First, they have not been shown to perform better than conventional nasal cannulas. Second, the oxygen flow per kilogram of weight to use in order to avoid severe hypercapnia has not been determined. Third, they have a high cost and greater space and time requirements. Furthermore, due to the production of aerosols [21], high-flow nasal cannulas can only be used in negative pressure environments. Therefore, it is reasonable to perform pre-oxygenation with FiO2 (inspired oxygen fraction) greater than 80% for two or three minutes before intubation (or until the exhaled fraction of oxygen is greater than 70% on the gas analyzer). Use two sources of oxygen: the anesthetic face mask and the classic nasal cannula with an oxygen flow of between 2 and 4 liters per minute. In addition to the PPE, use a barrier method (eg. the aerosol box) [24].

11. Anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation

Intravenous induction is preferred over inhalation. PPV should be avoided, which is why it is very important to do adequate pre-oxygenation. Some patients, especially the smallest or those with respiratory pathology, will require PPV to avoid hypoxemia. In these cases it should be administered by two people: one to adjust the face mask and the other for ventilation. The pressure exerted must be the minimum necessary to produce expansion of the thorax. It is recommended to minimize the flow of fresh gas to decrease the production of aerosols.

The video laryngoscope, preferably with a screen separate from the handpiece, can reduce the operators’ exposure to secretions and aerosols from the airway [19, 25]. The success rate with this device depends on the training and experience of the operator. Despite achieving an adequate visualization of the structures, the insertion of the endotracheal tube is not easy, thus increasing the frequency of hypoxemia [25]. These factors can oblige giving PPV, thus increasing the exposure time to droplets and aerosols, which is to be avoided. For these reasons, the video laryngoscope is the best alternative if trained people are available, otherwise the conventional laryngoscope may be less risky for both patients and the operators.

Special attention should be paid to the fixation of the tracheal tube to prevent its displacement, extubation or disconnection, requiring additional manipulation of the airway. Cuffed tubes should be used.

12. Mechanical ventilation and lung protection

The protective ventilation guidelines extrapolated from the clinical guidelines for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in adults emphasize four aspects: (1) CV less than or equal to 6 mL/kg of ideal weight; (2) Respiratory rate 35 breaths/min or less according to age; (3) Plateau pressure in the airway up to 30 cm H2O; (4) Positive pressure at the end of expiration (PEEP) from 5 cm H2O and up [26, 27]. The tidal volume can start at 8 mL/kg and decrease or remain there as long as it does not exceed the target of the mentioned plateau pressure [27, 28]. In addition, it is advisable to maintain a conduction pressure (plateau pressure-PEEP) below 12 to 15 cm H2O through adjustments in tidal volume and PEEP [29].

Evidence for the benefit of protective ventilation in pediatrics is scant. In general, studies are limited to newborns requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU due to respiratory distress syndrome [30]. In a study of lung resection surgery with separate, one lung ventilation in children under 6 years of age, protective ventilation was found to reduce postoperative lung complications compared to conventional ventilation [30]. Current consensus during the COVID-19 pandemic recommends the strategy of moderate VC (7 - 8 mL/kg). This can use short cuffed tubes to avoid the dispersion of aerosols and to avoid the risk of ventilating only the dead space [1, 28].

Lung recruitment can be achieved through sustained inflation (SI) or by gradually increasing PEEP. The safety and efficacy of SI in pediatrics have been determined when maintaining a pressure of 30 - 40 cm H2O for 15 - 20 seconds. Qiu and colleagues advocate a method to determine a specific SI figure based on 5 times the Mean Airway Pressure (MAP). This method provides optimal recruitment measured by oxygenation, lung dynamics, hemodynamic stability and lung histology [31].

Based on the Wuhan experience, adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 have poor tolerance to high PEEP, probably as a direct result of severe lung damage from the virus and inflammatory reaction. PEEP was successful in this patient population of less than 10 cm H2O. As pulmonary recruitment maneuvers, PEEP should kept under 20 cm H2O and decreased in increments of 2 to 3 cm H2O as long as the oxygenation, plateau pressure and compliance objectives are maintained [28].

13. Extubation

Coughing-is one of the main sources of human-to-human contact for respiratory viral diseases [32] and should be considered a high-risk complication for health personnel due to the production of droplets and respiratory aerosols [33]. Laryngospasm is more frequent in children than in adults and may require PPV, thus increasing the risk of exposure to droplets and aerosols.

Unlike anesthetic induction where the anesthesiologist may have some control over the situation, extubation and anesthetic emergence have a higher degree of uncertainty and hence an extubation protocol should be followed. Several authors have found that extubation with the anesthetized patient reduces the risk of cough and desaturation, but increases the risk of airway obstruction compared to awake patient extubation [34]. Furthermore, the patient’s position during extubation is also associated with different outcomes. With the patient deep and in lateral decubitus, the best oxygen saturation values (SpO2) are obtained in the following 5 minutes compared to extubation in the supine position [35].

To achieve deep extubation with the patient free of cough and laryngospasm, it is important to keep in mind the exhaled value of the halogenated gases. For this purpose, an effective dose (ED) of 95% in children has been defined for extubation with sevoflurane (MACEXT95) of 1.9% [36] and disfluorane 8.5% [37].

There is evidence for the effectiveness of some medications in preventing cough during extubation. In adults, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, fentanyl and lidocaine are better than placebo [38]. In children, dexmedetomidine can facilitate a smooth extubation process and reduce the requirement for sevoflurane and emergency agitation when administrated perioperatively with minimal respiratory depression. A reduction in the frequency of laryngospasm and cough of 29.90% and 18.92%, respectively, was reported in children when using 1.5 mg/kg intravenous lidocaine for 3 minutes before extubation compared to placebo [39].

Before extubation, adequate SpO2 and respiratory effort must be guaranteed. Gastric ultrasound can be useful to decrease the possibility of deep extubation in patients with suspected full stomach.

In accordance with the above, it is reasonable to perform extubation with the patient deep in spontaneous ventilation, with adequate respiratory effort and lying on their side opposite the location of the assistant for extubation.

During the procedure, the following recommendations may be helpful: aspirate the oropharyngeal secretions with a closed system, put on nasal glasses of adequate size for the patient’s age, close the flow of fresh gases just before the procedure, and remove the connected trachea tube to the filter and circuit. The use of a clamp on the orotracheal tube during extubation with the patient under spontaneous ventilation can produce negative pressure pulmonary edema and is not recommended.

14. Anesthetic recovery

Patients must recover within the surgery room. Specific attention should be paid to the patency of the airway and SpO2. The patient should wear a surgical mask and, if possible, remain inside the aerosol box. Post-operative pain, hypothermia, vomiting and agitation should be avoided through multimodal strategies, as these can be risk factors for healthcare personnel.

15. Conclusion

The pediatric population can be an important source of viral transmission, even in the absence of symptoms. During the perioperative care of pediatric patients, laryngospasm, airway obstruction, desaturation requiring positive pressure ventilation, psychomotor agitation, cough, tracheal intubation, and extubation represent high risk situations for healthcare personnel. During the airway approach, health workers must all wear PPE. A marked decrease in contagion both in healthcare personnel and in patients and their families can be achieved through the use of filters in the anesthetic circuits, the aerosol box, as well as the implementation of a methodical and orderly protocol during the patient’s transit from entry into the institution until their anesthetic recovery and discharge.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the peer reviewers and editors for their opinions and suggestions.

Conflicts of interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

References

Marraro GA, Spada C. Consideration of the respiratory support strategy of severe acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;22:183–194.

[Google Scholar]

Calvo C, García López-Hortelano M, de Carlos Vicente JC, et al. Recommendations on the clinical management of the COVID-19 infection by the «new coronavirus» SARS-CoV2. Spanish Paediatric Association working group. An Pediatr (Barc). 2020;92:241.e1-241.e11.

[Google Scholar]

Lee-Archer P, Ungern-Sternberg BS. Pediatric anesthetic implications of COVID-19-A review of current literature. Pediatr Anesth. 2020.

[Google Scholar]

Chen ZM, Fu JF, Shu Q, et al. Diagnosis and treatment recommendations for pediatric respiratory infection caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus. World J Pediatr. 2020;16:240-246.

[Google Scholar]

Cao Q, Chen Y-C, Chen C-L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in children: Transmission dynamics and clinical characteristics. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119:670–673.

[Google Scholar]

Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020.

[Google Scholar]

Carl Heneghan, Jason Oke, Tom Jefferson. COVID-19 How many Healthcare workers are infected? CEBM. 2020. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-how-many-healthcare-workers-are-infected/.

[Google Scholar]

Ludvigsson JF. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:1088-1095.

[Google Scholar]

COVID-19 en personal de salud en Colombia, Boletín No.6. Instituto Nacional de Salud de Colombia. 2020. Available in: https://www.ins.gov.co/COVID19PERSONALDESALUDCOLOMBIA/boletin-6-covid-personal-salud.jpg.

[Google Scholar]

Public Health England. COVID-19: infection prevention and control guidance. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-infection-prevention-and-control/covid-19-personal-protective-equipment-ppe.

[Google Scholar]

Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1564-1567.

[Google Scholar]

Wen X, Li Y. Anesthesia Procedure of Emergency Operation for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020;21:299–299.

[Google Scholar]

Cook TM. Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic - a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:920-927.

[Google Scholar]

World Health Organization. Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations.

[Google Scholar]

Yang Y-L, Huang C-H, Luk H-N, et al. Adaptation to the Plastic Barrier Sheet to Facilitate Intubation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Anesth Analg. 2020.

[Google Scholar]

Schrock CR, Montana MC. Rapid COVID-19–related Clinical Adaptations and Unanticipated Risks. Anesthesiology. 2020;133:248.

[Google Scholar]

Trujillo A, Jaramillo X. Considerations for the Use of Respiratory Filters in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020.

[Google Scholar]

Rosenbaum A, Kain ZN, Laisson P, et al. The place of premedication in pediatric practice. Pediatr Anesth. 2009;19:817–828.

[Google Scholar]

Consenso recomendaciones anestesia pediatrica sección anestesia pediatrica. SEDAR. 2020. Available in: https://www.sedar.es/images/site/NOTICIAS/coronavirus/2020_Ped_Covid19_recomendaciones_final.pdf.

[Google Scholar]

Von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Salbutamol premedication in children with a recent respiratory tract infection. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:1064–1069.

[Google Scholar]

Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anesth. 2020;67:568-576.

[Google Scholar]

Ballard A, Khadra C, Adler S, et al. External cold and vibration for pain management of children undergoing needle- related procedures in the emergency department: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023214.

[Google Scholar]

Ballard A, Khadra C, Adler S, et al. Efficacy of the Buzzy Device for Pain Management During Needle-related Procedures. Clin J Pain. 2019;35:532–543.

[Google Scholar]

Else SDN, Kovatsis PG. A Narrative Review of Oxygenation During Pediatric Intubation and Airway Procedures. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:831–840.

[Google Scholar]

Abdelgadir IS, Phillips RS, Singh D, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD011413.

[Google Scholar]

Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD003844.

[Google Scholar]

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301-1308.

[Google Scholar]

Meng L, Qiu H, Wan L, et al. Intubation and Ventilation amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Wuhan’s Experience. Anesthesiology. 2020;132; 1317-1332.

[Google Scholar]

Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:747–755.

[Google Scholar]

Lee JH, Bae J il, Jang YE, et al. Lung protective ventilation during pulmonary resection in children: a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:692–701.

[Google Scholar]

Jauncey-Cooke J, East CE, Bogossian F. Paediatric lung recruitment: A review of the clinical evidence. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015;16:127–132.

[Google Scholar]

Aminnejad R, Salimi A, Saeidi M. Lidocaine during intubation and extubation in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Can J Anesth. 2020;67;759.

[Google Scholar]

Trujillo A. Response to Wen and Li, Anesthesia Procedure of Emergency Operation for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020;21:398.

[Google Scholar]

Koo C-H, Lee S, Chung S, et al. Deep vs. Awake Extubation and LMA Removal in Terms of Airway Complications in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2018;7:353.

[Google Scholar]

Jung H, Kim HJ, Lee Y-C, et al. Comparison of lateral and supine positions for tracheal extubation in children. Anaesthesist. 2019;68:303–308.

[Google Scholar]

Inomata S, Suwa T, Toyooka H, et al. End-Tidal Sevoflurane Concentration for Tracheal Extubation and Skin Incision in Children. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:1263–12677.

[Google Scholar]

Cranfield KAW, Bromley LM. Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane for tracheal extubation in deeply anaesthetized, unpremedicated children. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:370–371.

[Google Scholar]

Tung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, et al. Medications to reduce emergence coughing after general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:480–495.

[Google Scholar]

Bhat S, Sanikop C. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in prevention of post extubation laryngospasm in children undergoing cleft palate surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2010;54:132.

[Google Scholar]