Signa Vitae. 2021; 17(1): 11-19. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0091
Original Research

A bibliometric analysis of highly cited publications in Web of Science category of emergency medicine

Yuh-Shan Ho1,*,

1Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, 41354 Taichung, Taiwan

*Corresponding Author(s):ysho@asia.edu.tw (Yuh-Shan Ho)

History Submitted: 28 September 2020 | Accepted: 15 October 2020 | Published: 08 January 2021
Copyright:  ©2021  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

The highly cited publications in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine were identified and analysed. Articles that have been cited 100 or more times from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2019 were assessed regarding their distribution in indexed journals. Six publication indicators were applied to compare the publication performance of countries and institutes. The Y-index was applied to assess publication quantity and the characteristics of contribution to highly cited authors. Words used in the highly cited articles were analysed. Citation histories of the most frequently cited articles and the most impact articles were also compared. Results showed that the USA ranked top in the six publication indicators. The University of California Davis in the USA was the most independent institute.

Keywords:Highly cited publications;Emergency medicine;Bibliometric;Web of Science Core Collection;TCyear;Cyear;CPPyear
PDF(1.17 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Yuh-Shan Ho. A bibliometric analysis of highly cited publications in Web of Science category of emergency medicine. Signa Vitae. 2021; 17(1): 11-19. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0091

1. Introduction

In the 1970s, a paper that had been cited 80 or more times was considered ‘highly cited’ in mathematics [1]. Garfield also reported that highly cited articles with 100 or more citations are generally categorized under clinical or general medical journals [2]. It has been reported that most of the classics in a field are still highly cited [3]. Highly cited papers can be useful indicators for identifying ‘worldclass’ research [4]. Highly cited publications in a Web of Science category in Science Citation Index Expanded were investigated including chemical engineering [5], health care sciences and services [6], horticulture [7], environmental engineering [8], dentistry, oral surgery and medicine [9], and materials science-related categories [10]. Approximately a decade between the year of data collection and the peak output of highly cited papers were generally found. Highly cited publications might not be the most impactful in the most recent year.

In this study, publications with 100 or more citations from the Web of Science Core Collection since their publication year to the end of 2019 in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine were selected as highly cited publications. Basic bibliometric analyses were carried out using Excel. Y-index was used to evaluate the publication performance of highly cited authors.

2. Methodology

The data relevant to the present study were derived from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection. According to Journal Citation Reports (JCR) of 2019, it indexes 9,356 journals with citation references across 178 Web of Science categories in SCI-EXPANDED. There were 31 journals listed in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine. In total, 107,437 documents including 68,694 articles were found in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine from 1965 to 2019 based on SCI-EXPANDED (updated on September 14, 2020).

Two citation indicators TCyear and Cyear were employed to characterize the highly cited articles. TCyear is the total citation number from the Web of Science Core Collection since publication to the end of the most recent year [11, 12]. Cyear is the number of citations in the most recent year [5]. Cyear means the number of citations in 2019. TCyear 100 was used to retrieve highly cited articles [10]. All document information from SCI-EXPANDED were checked and downloaded into Microsoft Excel 2016 for manual analysis [13, 14].

In the SCI-EXPANDED database, the corresponding-author is labeled as reprint author, but in this study, we used the term corresponding-author [5]. Similarly, in a single institutional article, the institution is classified as the first as well as the corresponding-author institution [10]. In multi-corresponding-author articles, only the last corresponding-author, institute, and country were considered [15]. In a single-author article where authorship is unspecified, the single-author is both the first- and corresponding-author [10].

Affiliations to England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales were reclassified as being from the United Kingdom (UK) [16]. Affiliations to Fed Rep Ger (Federal Republic of Germany) were reclassified as being from Germany [5].

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Document type and language of publication

A total of 1,026 highly cited publications (0.95% of 107,437 documents in the category of emergency medicine in SCI-EXPANDED) with TC2019 100 were found including 898 highly cited articles (0.95% of 68,694 articles). It was reported that the percentage of highly cited documents was 0.68% in the category of health care sciences and services [6], and the percentage of highly cited articles in the category of dentistry, oral surgery and medicine was 1.8% [9]. To have scientific results, which can be repeated and checked, Ho’s group proposed citation indicator TCyear, the number of citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of the most recent year [11, 12] and citations per publication (CPPyear = TCyear/TP) [14]. Analysis of document types and their citations per publication was proposed earlier [17]. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the five document types with the total number of publications (TP), the number of authors per publication (APP), and citations per publication (CPP2019) [18]. Document type of articles was the most popular with 898 articles (88% of 1,026 highly cited documents) and the number of authors per publication (APP) of 5.5. Reviews had the highest CPP2019 with 181, which is slightly higher than articles with CPP2019 of 166. In total, 113 highly cited reviews were published in 12 journals, mainly in Annals of Emergency Medicine (31 reviews; 27% of 113 reviews) with CPP2019 of 171, Resuscitation (24; 21%) with CPP2019 of 209, and Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured (24; 21%) with CPP2019 of 229. The most frequently cited review entitled ‘Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review’ [19] was published in Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured with TC2019 of 894. It has been noticed that documents could be classified within two document types in Web of Science, resulting in the sum of percentages greater than 100% [20]. For example, 136 documents were classified in both document types of articles and proceedings papers.

Table 1.Citations and authors according to the document type.
Document typeTP%AUAPPTC2019CPP2019
Article898884,8935.5148,828166
Proceedings paper136136644.922,743167
Review113115955.420,500181
Editorial material111.1292.61,518138
Note40.39123706177
TP: number of articles; %: percentage of publications in all documents; AU: number of authors; APP: number of authors per publication (AU/TP); TC2019: total citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication to the end of 2019; CPP2019 citations per paper (TC2019/TP).

Only document type of articles was considered for further analysis because they include more complete information such as introduction, method, results, discussion, and conclusions [21]. As a result, 898 highly cited articles were identified in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine in SCI-EXPANDED. Only eight non-English highly cited articles were published in German. All the eight articles were published in Unfallchirurg with CPP2019 of 133.

3.2 Publication distribution

A relationship between the total number of highly cited articles in a year (TP) and their citations per publication (CPPyear = TCyear/TP) by the decades [5] and the years [22] in a Web of Science category in SCI-EXPANDED has been proposed. Altogether, 898 highly cited articles in emergency medicine were found between 1966 and 2016 with total TC2019 of 148,828 with an average of 166 and the maximum value of TC2019 was 1,062. Fig. 1 shows the distribution of these 898 highly cited articles over the years and their citations per publication (CPP2019). Only two highly cited articles were found in 1966 and no articles were identified after 2016. The year 2007 was the most prolific in terms of highly cited articles in emergency medicine. The highest CPP2019 of 349 in 1970, which can be attributed to the only highly cited article entitled ‘Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases’ [23] in the Journal of Trauma with TC2019 of 349. The earliest highly cited articles in emergency medicine were ‘Bullet velocity and design as determinants of wounding capability: An experimental study’ [24] and ‘Tolerance curves of acceleration and intracranial pressure and protective index in experimental head injury’ [25] published in Journal of Trauma in 1966 with TC2019 of 107 (ranked 747th) and 106 (ranked 770th), respectively. The latest highly cited articles were found in 2016, entitled ‘EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe’ [26] in Resuscitation and ‘Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T’ [27] in Annals of Emergency Medicine with TC2019 of 200 (ranked 160th) and 135 (ranked 415th), respectively.

Number of highly cited articles and citations per publication by year.

Fig. 1.Number of highly cited articles and citations per publication by year.

3.3 Journals

A total of 31 journals were classified under the Web of Science category of emergency medicine in 2019. The 898 highly cited articles were published in 14 of these journals (45% of 31 journals), and in four other emergency medicine journals that were no longer tracked by the Web of Science category of emergency medicine as of 2019 (Table 2). Eighty-five percent of the highly cited articles were published in four journals: Annals of Emergency Medicine (340 articles; 38% od 898 articles), Resuscitation (176; 20%), Academic Emergency Medicine (138; 15%), and Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured (104; 12%). Annals of Emergency Medicine not only published the most highly cited articles but also had the highest IF2019 of 5.799 in the category of emergency medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine had the highest APP of 8.0, followed by Resuscitation with an APP of 7.9. A total of 12 highly cited articles were published in the Emergency Medicine Journal with the highest CPP2019 of 184. Unfallchirurg had the lowest IF2019 of 0.677 (ranked 25th ) and published eight highly cited articles with CPP2019 of 133.

Table 2.The 14 journals with highly cited articles in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine.
JournalTP (%)IF2019 (rank)APPCPP2019
Annals of Emergency Medicine340 (38)5.799 (1)5.4168
Resuscitation176 (20)4.215 (2)7.9176
Academic Emergency Medicine138 (15)3.064 (6)4.7162
Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured104 (12)2.106 (12)4162
American Journal of Emergency Medicine52 (5.8)1.911 (13)5.3165
Journal of Trauma19 (2.1)N/A2.7161
Journal of Emergency Medicine16 (1.8)1.224 (22)3.8160
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation13 (1.4)N/A4.6130
Emergency Medicine Journal12 (1.3)2.491 (7)3.4184
Unfallchirurg8 (0.89)0.677 (25)5133
Pediatric Emergency Care8 (0.89)1.170 (23)5.8113
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America3 (0.33)1.528 (18)2.7142
Journal of Emergency Nursing3 (0.33)1.430 (20)6149
Prehospital Emergency Care3 (0.33)2.290 (9)6.7116
Injury-The British Journal of Accident Surgery1 (0.11)N/A2110
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery1 (0.11)2.139 (11)1114
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine1 (0.11)2.370 (8)8143
TP: total number of highly cited articles; IF2019: journal impact factor for 2019; APP: number of authors per article; CPP2019 citations per paper (TC2019/TP), N/A: not available.

3.4 Countries, institutions, and authors

There were 857 highly cited articles (95% of 898 highly cited articles) with author affiliation information in SCI-EXPANDED from 46 countries. Altogether, 749 (87% of 857 articles) were single country articles from 29 countries and 108 (13%) were internationally collaborative articles from 43 countries. Six publication indicators listed below were applied to compare the top ten productive countries (Table 3) [21, 28]: total highly cited articles (TP), independent articles (IP), internationally collaborative articles (CP), first-author articles (FP), corresponding-author articles (RP), and single-author articles (SP). The top 10 most productive countries published 811 articles (95% of the 857 articles and 95% of TC2019 of 142,076). Seven European countries, two American countries, and one Oceania country were ranked in the top 10 publications. Japan with eight highly cited articles ranked top in Asia. The USA dominated in the six publication indicators with TP of 565 highly cited articles (66% of 857 highly cited articles), IP of 500 articles (67% of 749 independent articles), CP of 65 articles (60% of 108 internationally collaborative articles), FP of 538 articles (63% of 857 first-author articles), RP of 507 articles (62% of 813 corresponding-author articles), and SP of 28 articles (58% of 48 single-author articles).

Table 3.Top 10 most productive countries.
CountryTPTPR (%)IPR (%)CPR (%)FPR (%)RPR (%)SPR (%)
USA5651 (66)1 (67)1 (60)1 (63)1 (62)1 (58)
UK1042 (12)2 (8.0)2 (41)2 (9.5)2 (9.5)3 (6.3)
Canada703 (8.2)3 (5.6)3 (26)3 (5.8)3 (5.9)3 (6.3)
Germany534 (6.2)4 (3.6)4 (24)4 (4.1)4 (4.3)8 (2.1)
Australia375 (4.3)5 (2.9)9 (14)5 (2.9)5 (3.0)6 (4.2)
Sweden346 (4.0)6 (2.8)10 (12)6 (2.7)6 (2.7)2 (10)
Norway267 (3.0)7 (1.3)8 (15)7 (1.6)7 (1.6)N/A
Italy258 (2.9)8 (1.1)6 (16)10 (1.1)9 (1.1)N/A
Switzerland258 (2.9)9 (0.93)5 (17)8 (1.5)7 (1.6)3 (6.3)
Netherlands2310 (2.7)11 (0.8)6 (16)9 (1.2)9 (1.1)N/A
TP: total highly cited articles; TPR (%): total number of articles and the percentage of total articles; IPR (%): rank and percentage of single country articles; CPR (%): rank and percentage of internationally collaborative articles; FPR (%), rank and the percentage of first author articles; RPR (%), rank and the percentage of the corresponding authored articles; SPR (%), rank and the percentage of the single authored articles; CPP2019: citations per publication (TC2019/TP); N/A: not available.

In total, 417 highly cited articles (49% of 857 highly cited articles) instituted independent articles and 440 (51%) were inter-institutionally collaborative articles. Six publication indicators [29] were applied to compare the top 15 institutions with TP > 15 (Table 4). Harvard University in the USA with 36 highly cited articles (4.2% of 857 highly cited articles) and CP of 31 articles (7.0% of 440 inter-institutionally collaborative articles) ranked top, respectively. The University of California Davis in the USA dominated in three publication indicators with IP of nine articles (2.2% of 417 institutionally independent articles), FP of 12 articles (1.4% of 857 first-author articles), and RP of 12 articles (1.5% of 813 corresponding-author articles). Also, Western Hospital in Australia, the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and the University of Lund Hospital in Sweden published two single-author articles, respectively.

Table 4.Top 15 most productive institutions.
InstituteTPTPR (%)IPR (%)CPR (%)FPR (%)RPR (%)SPR (%)
Harvard University, USA361 (4.2)9 (1.2)1 (7)5 (1.2)3 (1.1)4 (2.1)
University of Penn, USA282 (3.3)15 (1.0)2 (5.5)2 (1.3)1 (1.5)4 (2.1)
University of Colorado, USA253 (2.9)9 (1.2)3 (4.5)2 (1.3)3 (1.1)N/A
University of Washington, USA234 (2.7)9 (1.2)5 (4.1)5 (1.2)8 (1.0)4 (2.1)
University of California San Diego, USA215 (2.5)5 (1.4)8 (3.4)8 (1.1)3 (1.1)N/A
University of Pittsburgh, USA206 (2.3)5 (1.4)10 (3.2)8 (1.1)8 (1.0)N/A
Brigham And Women’s Hospital, USA197 (2.2)N/A4 (4.3)14 (0.82)18 (0.74)N/A
University of Arizona, USA197 (2.2)5 (1.4)12 (3.0)14 (0.82)18 (0.74)N/A
University of California Davis, USA197 (2.2)1 (2.2)20 (2.3)1 (1.4)1 (1.5)N/A
Medical College of Wisconsin, USA1810 (2.1)23 (0.72)8 (3.4)54 (0.35)73 (0.25)N/A
Oregon Health & Science University, USA1810 (2.1)34 (0.48)6 (3.6)14 (0.82)11 (0.86)N/A
University California San Francisco, USA1810 (2.1)5 (1.4)16 (2.7)2 (1.3)3 (1.1)4 (2.1)
University of Ottawa, Canada1810 (2.1)34 (0.48)6 (3.6)24 (0.58)47 (0.37)N/A
Massachusetts General Hospital, USA1614 (1.9)23 (0.72)12 (3.0)19 (0.70)11 (0.86)4 (2.1)
University of California Los Angeles, USA1614 (1.9)2 (1.9)30 (1.8)10 (0.93)11 (0.86)N/A
TP: total highly cited articles; TPR (%): total number of articles and the percentage of total articles; IPR (%): rank and percentage of single institute articles; NPR (%): rank and percentage of nationally collaborative articles; IPR (%): rank and percentage of internationally collaborative articles; FPR (%): rank and the percentage of first author articles; RPR (%): rank and the percentage of the corresponding authored articles; SPR (%), rank and the percentage of the single authored articles; CPP2019: citations per publication (TC2019/TP); N/A: not available.

Ho proposed the Y-index indicator, which is related to the number of first-author highly cited articles (FP) and corresponding-author highly cited articles (RP). The Y-index combines two parameters (j, h) to assess both the publication potential and the characteristics of the contribution as a single index. This indicator has also been applied to compare highly cited authors in Web of Science categories of health care sciences and services [6] and dentistry, oral surgery and medicine [9]. The Y-index is defined as [5, 10]

j=FP+RP

h=tan1RPFP

where j (a constant related to publication quantity) is the publication potential, and h (describes the proportion of RP to FP) is publication characteristics. The greater the value of j, the more the first- and corresponding-author contributes to the highly cited articles.

h = π / 2, indicates an author that has only published corresponding-author articles, j is the number of corresponding-author articles;

π / 2 > h > 0.7854 indicates an author with more corresponding-author articles;

h = 0.7854 indicates that an author has the same number of first- and corresponding-author articles;

0.7854 < h < 0 indicates an author with more first-author articles;

h = 0, indicates an author that has only published first-author articles, j is the number of first-author articles.

In total, 815 (91% of 898) highly cited articles in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine with both first- and corresponding-author information was used to calculate Y-index for authors. A total of 815 highly cited articles were contributed by 3,301 authors. Particularly, 2,553 (77% of 3,301 authors) authors did not have any first- or corresponding-author articles with Y-index = (0, 0); 76 (2.3%) authors only published corresponding-author articles with h = π / 2; 33 (1.0%) authors published more corresponding-author articles with π / 2 > h > 0.7854; 518 (16%) authors published the same number of first- or corresponding-author articles with h = 0.7854; seven (0.21%) authors published more first-author articles with 0.7854 > h > 0; and 114 (3.5%) authors published only first-author articles with h = 0. Fig. 2 shows the distribution of the Y-index (j, h) of the top 107 highly cited authors with j 3. Each dot represents one value that could be one author or many authors. For example, J.M. Pines and S.M. Green with (13, 0.8622) as well as G.D. Perkins and other 42 other authors with (4, 0.7854) and M.S. Eisenberg and 17 other authors with (3, 1.107).

T.L. Litovitz had the highest j of 18, published 18 highly cited articles on the annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Only ten of them were selected for Y-index analysis because they had first- and corresponding-author information. Litovitz was both first- and corresponding-author in nine of the ten articles. Followed by P.V. Giannoudis who published 10 highly cited articles, including six first-author and 10 corresponding-author articles with (16, 1.030). M. Blaivas (10, 0.9828) and J. Soar (10, 0.7854) had the same value for j. It is clear that both of these authors are located on the same curve (j = 10) in Fig. 2, indicating that they have the same publication potential with different publication characteristics. Blaivas (h = 0.9828) has a higher ratio of corresponding-author articles to first-author articles, than Soar (h = 0.7854). Similarly, F. Sterz (3, π / 2), M.S. Eisenberg (3, 1.107), and C.D. Deakin (3, 0.4636) are located on the same curve (j = 3). Sterz only published corresponding-author articles, Eisenberg published more corresponding-author articles, and Deakin published more first-author articles.

Distribution of the top 107 highly cited authors with their 
Y-index values (j ≥ 3).

Fig. 2.Distribution of the top 107 highly cited authors with their Y-index values (j 3).

3.5 The most frequently cited articles

The most frequently cited articles with TCyear as citation indicator indicated their impact on a research topic. Citation indicator Cyear was proposed to evaluate the most impact articles in the most recent year [5]. These two citation indicators were applied to compare the most frequently cited articles in the Web of Science category of chemical engineering [5]. Table 5 presents the top 10 articles cited more than 600 times (TCyear> 600) in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine. Among them, four articles were published in the 2000s, three in the 1990s, two in the 2010s, and one in the 1980s. The first article with TC2019 of 600 published in 1986 was ‘A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis’ [30]. Alvarado reported that eight predictive factors helped diagnose acute appendicitis and came up with a diagnostic score that could help interpret a picture of acute appendicitis. This older article is still highly cited because it is relevant and valuable even to 2019 with C2019 of 23 (rank 49th) and TC2019 of 635 (rank 8th). Oppenheim and Renn (1978) [31] reported that older papers are still actively being used for historical purposes or the context. Publications with a clear historical significance will be cited for historical reasons [32]. Those which are cited less frequently will not become classics and will not be cited as milestone events [32]. The only classic article with TC2019 1,000 [33] in emergency medicine was entitled ‘Bone substitutes: An update’ [35] with TC2019 of 1,062 by P.V. Giannoudis, H. Dinopoulos, and E. Tsiridis from St James’s University Hospital in the UK. Giannoudis et al. (2005) [34] presented an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications in the classic article in 2005.

Table 5.The top 10 most frequently cited articles in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine.
Ran (TC2019)Rank (C2019)Article titleReference
1 (1,062)3 (126)Bone substitutes: An update[34]
2 (771)33 (43)Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods[44]
3 (752)89 (25)European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010: Section 1. Executive summary[36]
4 (749)26 (48)Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: A report of 14 720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[45]
5 (730)7 (107)Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain[39]
6 (718)155 (18)European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010: Section 4. Adult advanced life support[37]
7 (699)19 (52)Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity[46]
8 (635)23 (49)A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis[30]
9 (633)69 (29)Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A graphic model[35]
10 (601)116 (21)Overcrowding in the nation’s emergency departments: Complex causes and disturbing effects[47]
TC2019: total citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2019; C2019: citations in 2019 only.

The journals in which these top 10 articles published were Annals of Emergency Medicine (IF2019 = 5.799; ranked 1st ) with five articles, Resuscitation (IF2019 = 4.215; ranked 2nd) with three articles, Academic Emergency Medicine (IF2019 = 3.064; ranked 6th ) with one article, and Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured (IF2019 = 2.106; ranked 12th) with also one article. There was a strong relation between TC2019 and IF2019 for the most frequently cited articles in emergency medicine. Seven of the top ten articles published by first-author are from the USA and three from the UK. Only two of the top ten most cited articles in TC2019 were ranked in the top ten in C2019.

3.6 Citation history of articles the top ten articles with the TC2019

The citation history of an article shows characteristics of the article’s impact after publication. The citation history of the top ten articles (TC2019> 600) is shown in Fig. 3. Earlier publications like Larsen et al. (1993) [35] had a long history of impact, but less impactful in recent years. Citation history of articles by Nolan et al. (2010) [36] and Deakin et al. (2010) [37] were a type of initially much-praised articles named by Avramescu (1979) [38]. The citation history of articles by Giannoudis et al. (2005) [34] and Bijur et al. (2001) [39] was not recognized initially but has increased its citation with a constantly growing rate as a genial work [38]. Article by Nolan et al. (2010) [36] was the most cited in emergency medicine from 2013 to 2014 with Cyear> 100.

Citation histories of the top 10 most frequently cited articles 
with TC2019&gt; 600.

Fig. 3.Citation histories of the top 10 most frequently cited articles with TC2019> 600.

3.7 Citation history of the top ten articles with the C2019

Only 44% of the top 100 articles with TC2019 were ranked on the top 100 with C2019. Citation indicator Cyear, annual citations from Web of Science Core Collection in the most recent year was proposed [5, 40]. In the last decade, Cyear was widely applied for the most impactful articles in Web of Science categories of chemical engineering [5], environmental sciences [41], health care sciences and services [6], horticulture [7], and materials science-related categories [10]. The citation history of the top ten articles (C2019> 80) is shown in Fig. 4. Five of the ten articles were published in 2015 and one in 2001, 2003, 2005, 2011, and 2016, respectively. Articles by Giannoudis et al. (2005) [34] and Bijur et al. (2001) [39] were not only ranked the top ten on C2019 but also the top ten on T2019. The article by Giannoudis et al. (2005) [34] was the most cited in 2016 and the article by Soar et al. (2015) [42] was the most impactful after 2016 in emergency medicine.

Citation histories of the top 10 most impact articles in 2019 
with C2019&gt; 80.

Fig. 4.Citation histories of the top 10 most impact articles in 2019 with C2019> 80.

3.8 Words in article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus

Analysis of used words in article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus were proposed for the main research topics [43]. In SCI-EXPANDED, 479 (53% 898 articles) and 217 (24%) articles lacked author keywords and KeyWords Plus information, respectively. Table 6 shows the top 20 most used words in a highly cited article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus in emergency medicine. A total of 288 articles (32% of 898 highly cited articles), 79 (19% of 419 articles with author keyword information), and 77 (11% of 681 articles with KeyWords Plus information) included ‘emergency’, ‘cardiac arrest’, and ‘care’ in article title, respectively. ‘Resuscitation’ and ‘survival’ listed in the top 20 most used words in article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus, respectively. ‘Pain’ and ‘outcome’ ranked not only in the top 20 words in article title but also in the top 20 author keywords. ‘Cardiopulmonary resuscitation’, ‘cardiac arrest’, ‘ventricular fibrillation’, and ‘outcomes’ were the top 20 most used author keywords and KeyWords Plus, respectively.

Table 6. Top 20 most used words in highly cited article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus.
Words in titleTPR (%)Author keywordsTPR (%)KeyWords PlusTPR (%)
emergency2881 (32)cardiac arrest791 (19)care771 (11)
department1882 (21)cardiopulmonary resuscitation482 (11)management582 (8.5)
patients1103 (12)emergency department373 (8.8)cardiopulmonary-resuscitation493 (7.2)
cardiac984 (11)resuscitation344 (8.1)survival434 (6.3)
arrest945 (10)outcome255 (6.0)hospital cardiac-arrest395 (5.7)
resuscitation945 (10)emergency medical services246 (5.7)CPR326 (4.7)
clinical707 (7.8)heart arrest246 (5.7)quality317 (4.6)
out-of-hospital668 (7.3)hypothermia188 (4.3)children298 (4.3)
care509 (5.6)emergency medicine179 (4.1)cardiac-arrest269 (3.8)
acute4910 (5.5)survival1610 (3.8)American-Heart-Association2510 (3.7)
cardiopulmonary4711 (5.2)ultrasound1610 (3.8)emergency2311 (3.4)
treatment4512 (5.0)epidemiology1512 (3.6)ventricular-fibrillation2311 (3.4)
survival4013 (4.5)cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr)1413 (3.3)impact2213 (3.2)
prospective3914 (4.3)chest compression1413 (3.3)mortality2114 (3.1)
fractures3515 (3.9)education1413 (3.3)resuscitation2114 (3.1)
system3515 (3.9)out-of-hospital cpr1316 (3.1)life-support2016 (2.9)
pain3417 (3.8)trauma1117 (2.6)acute myocardial-infarction1917 (2.8)
chest3318 (3.7)overcrowding1018 (2.4)diagnosis1917 (2.8)
medical3219 (3.6)medical emergency team919 (2.1)outcomes1917 (2.8)
outcome3219 (3.6)outcomes919 (2.1)performance1917 (2.8)
pain919 (2.1)
ventricular fibrillation919 (2.1)
TP: total highly cited articles; R: rank

4. Conclusions

A total of 1,026 highly cited publications with TC2019 of 100 or more citations in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine in SCI-EXPANDED were found within five document types indexed in the Web of Science. Reviews and articles had a similar citation per publication. Reviews were published mainly in Annals of Emergency Medicine, Resuscitation, and Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured. The most highly cited articles were published in 2007. Articles published in 1970 had the highest citations per publication. Highly cited articles were published in 14 journals of the 31 journals in emergency medicine in 2019. Annals of Emergency Medicine was the most productive journal. Articles published in the Emergency Medicine Journal had the highest citations per publication. There is a significant relationship between highly cited articles and journal impact factors. The USA dominated in all six publication indicators. Harvard University in the USA published the most highly cited articles and was the most frequent partner. The University of California Davis in the USA shows its ability to independently conduct research. From the analysis results of the Y-index, T.L. Litovitz had the highest publication potential for the highly cited articles. The only classic article in the Web of Science category of emergency medicine in SCI-EXPANDED was published by authors from St James’s University Hospital in the UK. Words such as ‘pain’, ‘cardiopulmonary resuscitation’, ‘cardiac arrest’, and ‘ventricular fibrillation’ were most used in the highly cited articles in emergency medicine.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the peer reviewers and editors for their opinions and suggestions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

Garfield E. Highly cited works in mathematics. Part 1. ‘Pure’ mathematics. Current Contents. 1973; 47: 5-9.

[Google Scholar]

Garfield E. Journal citation studies. VIII. Some highly cited articles from highly cited general medical and clinical journals. Current Contents. 1974; 27: 5-12.

[Google Scholar]

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 35. Biochemistry papers published in 1940s. Current Contents. 1977; 8: 5-11.

[Google Scholar]

Tijssen RJW, Visser MS, van Leeuwen TN. Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics. 2002; 54:81-397.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS. Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2012; 20: 478-488.

[Google Scholar]

Hsu YHE, Ho YS. Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis for 1958-2012. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2014; 53: 446-458.

[Google Scholar]

Kolle SR, Shankarappa TH, Ho YS. Highly cited articles in Science Citation Index Expanded - subject category of horticulture: A bibliometric analysis. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 2017; 59: 133-145.

[Google Scholar]

Fu HZ, Ho YS. Collaborative characteristics and networks of national, institutional and individual contributors using highly cited articles in environmental engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded. Current Science. 2018; 115: 410-421.

[Google Scholar]

Yeung AWK, Ho YS. Highly cited dental articles and their authors: An evaluation of publication and citation characteristics. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2019; 10: e12462.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS. A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science. Current Science. 2014; 107: 1565-1572.

[Google Scholar]

Chuang KY, Wang MH, Ho YS. High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the Essential Science Indicators database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Scientometrics. 2011; 87: 551-562.

[Google Scholar]

Wang MH, Fu HZ, Ho YS. Comparison of universities’ scientific performance using bibliometric indicators. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2011; 16: 1-19.

[Google Scholar]

Li Z, Ho YS. Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 2018; 75: 97-110.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS, Fu HZ. (2016), Mapping of metal-organic frameworks publications: A bibliometric analysis. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2016; 73: 174-182.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Orthopaedic Research from 1991 to 2018. Orthopedic Research Online Journal, 2019; 6: 574-584.

[Google Scholar]

Chiu WT, Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 2005; 63: 3-23.

[Google Scholar]

Hsieh WH, Chiu WT, Lee YS, Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of patent ductus arteriosus treatments. Scientometrics, 2004; 60: 205-215.

[Google Scholar]

Monge-Nájera J, Ho YS. El Salvador publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: subjects, authorship, collaboration and citation patterns. Revista de Biología Tropical, 2017; 65: 1428-1436.

[Google Scholar]

Charles M Court-Brown, Ben Caesar. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2006; 37: 691-697.

[Google Scholar]

Usman M, Ho YS. A bibliometric study of the Fenton oxidation for soil and water remediation. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020; 270, 110886.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS, Satoh H, Lin SY. Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Internal Medicine, 2020; 49: 2219-2228.

[Google Scholar]

Chuang KY, Ho YS. An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Current Science. 2015; 108: 933-941.

[Google Scholar]

Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. Journal of Trauma. 1970; 10: 359.

[Google Scholar]

Demuth WE. Bullet velocity and design as determinants of wounding capability: An experimental study. Journal of Trauma. 1966; 6: 222-232.

[Google Scholar]

Gurdjian ES, Roberts VL, Thomas LM. Tolerance curves of acceleration and intracranial pressure and protective index in experimental head injury. Journal of Trauma. 1966; 6 : 600-604.

[Google Scholar]

Gräsner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, Masterson S, Böttiger BW, Herlitz J, et al. A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe. Resuscitation. 2016; 105: 188-195.

[Google Scholar]

Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordonez-Llanos J, deFilippi C, McCord J, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016; 68: 76-87.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS, Kahn M. A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index Expanded™. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014; 65: 372-385.

[Google Scholar]

Ho YS, Siu E, Chuang KY. A bibliometric analysis of dengue-related publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Future Virology, 2016; 11: 631-648.

[Google Scholar]

Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1986; 15: 557-564.

[Google Scholar]

Oppenheim C, Renn SP. Highly cited old papers and reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1978; 29: 225-231.

[Google Scholar]

Garfield E. Highly cited old papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1979; 30: 234-235.

[Google Scholar]

Long X, Huang JZ, Ho YS. A historical review of classic articles in surgery field. American Journal of Surgery. 2014; 208: 841-849.

[Google Scholar]

Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: An update. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured. 2005; 36: 20-27.

[Google Scholar]

Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP. Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A graphic model. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1993; 22: 1652-1658.

[Google Scholar]

Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:1219-1276.

[Google Scholar]

Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010: Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 1305-1352.

[Google Scholar]

Avramescu A. Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1979; 30: 296-303.

[Google Scholar]

Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2001; 8: 1153-1157.

[Google Scholar]

Chuang KY, Ho YS. Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Journal of Informetrics. 2014; 8: 951-962.

[Google Scholar]

Khan MA, Ho YS. Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: Merits and demerits of citation analysis. Science of the Total Environmen. 2012; 431: 122-127.

[Google Scholar]

Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger B., Perkins GD, Lott C, Carli P, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 100-147.

[Google Scholar]

Li LL, Ding GH, Feng N, Wang MH, Ho YS. Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics. 2009; 80: 39-58.

[Google Scholar]

Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, KoziolMcLain J, Barta DC, Steiner J. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: where are the methods? Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1996; 27: 305-308.

[Google Scholar]

Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, Larkin GL, Nadkarni V, Mancini ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: A report of 14 720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003; 58: 297-308.

[Google Scholar]

Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1996; 27: 485-489.

[Google Scholar]

Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation’s emergency departments: Complex causes and disturbing effects. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000; 35: 63-68.

[Google Scholar]

Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: Cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 2003; 20: 54-60.

[Google Scholar]

Marsell R, Einhorn TA. The biology of fracture healing. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2011; 42: 551-555.

[Google Scholar]

Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation, 2015; 95: 1-80.

[Google Scholar]

Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert VRM, Deakin CD, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5. Of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation, 2015; 95: 202-222.

[Google Scholar]

Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castren M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation, 2015; 95: 81-99.

[Google Scholar]

Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, Khalifa GEA, Alfonzo A, Bierens JJLM, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation, 2015; 95: 148-201.

[Google Scholar]