Signa Vitae. 2021; 17(1): 75-78. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0093
Original Research

Incidental appendiceal neoplasias: ten years’ experience with 1,642 patients

Server Sezgin Uludag1,*,, Nazim Gures2, Abdullah Kagan Zengin1

1Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İstanbul, Turkey

2Balikesir Atatürk City Hospital, Department of General Surgery, İstanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding Author(s):sszgn.uludag@gmail.com (Server Sezgin Uludag)

History Submitted: 15 July 2020 | Accepted: 24 August 2020 | Published: 08 January 2021
Copyright:  ©2021  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency. In this study, we investigated the rate of neoplasia among patients who underwent an appendectomy in our center, a large Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,642 cases of appendectomies performed between 2007 and 2017. In this study, the data included demographic data, operative and pathological findings, and additional procedures following the appendectomy. Results: Of the 1,642 appendectomies, 1,294 were laparoscopic, and 348 were open procedures. Appendiceal neoplasia was encountered in the examination of appendix specimens taken from 20 patients. Sessile serrated adenoma (SSRA) was found in seven patients, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in six patients, low-grade mucinous neoplasia (LGMN) in four patients, mucinous cystadenoma (MCA) in two patients, and diffuse adenoma (DA) in one patient. Two patients underwent right hemicolectomy due to positive surgical margins from previous surgeries. Colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) control were performed on all neoplasia patients during the postoperative period, and no additional pathology was seen. Conclusions: Although the probability of neoplasia after appendectomy is low, it should be considered. Adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors seem to be the most common neoplasias that are incidentally encountered in appendectomy specimens.

Keywords:Acute appendicitis;Appendiceal neoplasia;Sessile serrated adenoma;Neuroendocrine tumor
PDF(3.96 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Server Sezgin Uludag, Nazim Gures, Abdullah Kagan Zengin. Incidental appendiceal neoplasias: ten years' experience with 1,642 patients. Signa Vitae. 2021; 17(1): 75-78. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0093

1. Introduction

Acute appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix, and the appendix is an essential organ since it is considered the most common emergency surgical pathology worldwide [1]. The pathogenesis of appendicitis is still not fully understood. Multiple factors, such as mechanical, infectious and genetic issues, may cause inflammation of the appendix [2]. Appendicitis may be simple or complicated. The simple form does not cause inflammation to surrounding tissues, while in complex appendicitis, inflammation may lead to gangrene or perforation, with or without the development of an abscess. Perforation occurs in 13-20% of patients presenting with acute appendicitis [3]. Apart from open and standard laparoscopic approaches, single-incision laparoscopic surgery and the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures are the surgical techniques used in the treatment of acute appendicitis [4].

Appendiceal neoplasias, classified as mucinous and non-mucinous, are found in appendix specimens with rates of 0.9-1.4%, and the incidence rates are increasing [5]. Thus, in this 1,642-case series, we sought to determine the rate of appendiceal neoplasia and the types of neoplasia that were seen in appendectomy specimens.

2. Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1,642 cases of appendectomies performed between 2007 and 2017. The present study included patients over 18 years of age who underwent appendectomy with a preliminary diagnosis of appendicitis. Patients with incidental appendix neoplasias were studied. The male/female ratios and open-laparoscopic procedure rates were determined. The demographic characteristics and pathological findings of 20 cases of appendiceal neoplasia were revealed. Additional follow-up and interventions were also reviewed for these 20 patients.

3. Results

Of the 1,642 reviewed patients, 553 were women and 1,089 were men. Moreover, 1,294 of the cases were performed laparoscopically and 348 cases of appendectomy were performed using open surgery (Table 1).

Table 1.Demographics and Operation Types of the Appendectomies (All Series)
FemaleMale
Patient Age (Years; Mean ± SD)23.1 ± 18.225.8 ± 7.6
LA (%)52.170.18
OA (%)47.929.82
Total (%)100100
LA: Laparoscopic appendectomy; OA: open appendectomy.

All 20 patients with appendiceal neoplasia were diagnosed using ultrasound and clinical examination, and all cases were diagnosed preoperatively as acute appendicitis. There was no preoperative evidence that the patients had appendiceal neoplasia. An appendectomy was performed for all cases. Seventeen patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, while three patients underwent open surgery. The distribution of intraoperative staging was 40% catarrhal, 50% phlegmonous, and 10% gangrenous stages and perforation two patients with sessile serrated adenoma (SSRA).

In the pathological examinations performed after the appendectomies, appendiceal neoplasia was found in 20 patients. Their mean age was 45.65 years; 10 (50%) of the patients were women, and 10 (50%) were men. SSRA was found in seven patients (35%), neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in six patients (30%) (Fig. 1), low-grade mucinous neoplasia (LGMN) in four patients (20%), mucinous cystadenoma (MCA) in two patients (10%), and diffuse adenoma (DA) in one patient (5%; Table 2). Tumors were located in the distal part of the appendix in 80% of cases, at the proximal end in 5% of cases, and in the middle part in 15% of cases. Tumors were smaller than 1 cm in 75% of cases, between 1 and 2 cm in 20% of cases, and larger than 2 cm in 5% of cases. The tumor penetration depth was in the submucosa or muscular layer in 60% of cases, in the serosa in 25% of cases, and in the mesoappendix in 15% of cases. Detailed analysis of appendix NET patients is also shown in Table 3, and an operational image of a patient with appendiceal MCA is shown in Fig. 2.

X20, hematoxylin-eosin staining, neuroendocrine tumor.

Fig. 1.X20, hematoxylin-eosin staining, neuroendocrine tumor.

Table 2.Demographics of Neoplasia-Detected Patients, Patients’ Previous Histories, and Pathology Results of the Specimens
Patient AgeM/FPrevious History Pathology Result
40FNoneSSRA
53MRA, DUCLGMN
57MNoneSSRA
33MARFSSRA
44FITPLGMN
59FUCSSRA
44FECNET (WHO Grade 1)
22FNoneNET (WHO Grade 1)
32MNoneDA (Traditional)
25FNoneNET (WHO Grade 1)
62MHTSSRA
25FNoneNET (WHO Grade 1)
63MNoneMCA
62FHTMCA
60FDM, HTLGMN
21FAllergyNET (WHO Grade 1)
71MAS, AF, BPHSSRA
69MCADSSRA
48MNoneLGMN
37MNoneNET (WHO Grade 1)
SSRA: Sessile serrated adenoma; LGMN: low-grade mucinous neoplasia; NET: neuroendocrine tumor; MCA: mucinous cystadenoma; DA: diffuse adenoma; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; DUC: drug-induced colitis; ARF: acute rheumatoid fever; ITP: idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; UC: ulcerative colitis; EC: endometrial carcinoma; DM: diabetes mellitus; HT: hypertension; AS: ankylosing spondylitis; AF: atrial fibrillation; BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; CAD: coronary artery diseas.
Table 3.Detailed Analysis of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Patients
AgeGenderDiagnosisDiameterTherapyInvolvementSurgical borderMesoappendix invasionLymphovascular invasionFollow up (months)
44FNET (WHO Grade 1)1AppendectomySerosaNegativeNoneNone32
22FNET (WHO Grade 1)1.1Appendectomy–right hemicolectomySubserosaPositiveNoneNone21
25FNET (WHO Grade 1)0.4AppendectomySubserosaNegativeNoneNone96
25FNET (WHO Grade 1)0.6AppendectomySerosaNegativePositiveNone86
21FNET (WHO Grade 1)0.3AppendectomyM. propriaNegativeNoneNone14
37MNET (WHO Grade 1)0.7AppendectomyM. propriaNegativeNoneNone18
Operative image of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma (MCA).

Fig. 2.Operative image of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma (MCA).

In 18 patients, neoplasia was limited to the appendix, and no additional surgical intervention was required. Two patients (10%; one patient with MCA and one patient with NET) underwent right hemicolectomy due to positive surgical margins from previous surgery. Colonoscopy, abdominal, and chest computed tomography (CT) controls were performed on all patients during the postoperative period. Chromogranin A (NET) and tumor marker levels (epithelial tumors) were measured. All the patients were included in a routine follow-up program. The patients were followed up for a mean period of three years (0.6-5 years) with abdominal ultrasonography and gallium 68 positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in terms of recurrences. Recurrences were not detected in any of the patients.

4. Discussion

Acute appendicitis, which causes the most frequent surgical emergency operation, has been treated with the open operation until Karl Semm performed the first laparoscopic appendectomy in 1980. Nowadays, laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred method of treating acute appendicitis due to advantages, such as less pain, shorter hospitalization time, and a quick return to work [1, 4, 6].

There are approximately 300,000 appendectomies performed annually in the United States. The rate of neoplasia, which is showing an increasing trend, is 0.9-1.4% [5, 7]. The 1.12% rate in our series is consistent with this. The appendix may be epithelial-derived adenoma and adenocarcinoma, as well as non-epithelial NET and lymphoma. Epithelial tumors are also classified as mucinous and non-mucinous, and LGMN, also seen in our series, is more common [5, 7].

NET, formerly called carcinoid tumor, is the most common neoplasia of the appendix. However, there has been a tendency toward epithelial neoplasia in recent years [5, 7, 8]. Similar to the 0.33% rate of Eğin et al.’s [8] large appendectomy series, NET was observed in our series at a rate of 0.36%. Senel et al. [9] studied 13,863 appendectomy specimens, and they also observed NET, with a 0.20% ratio (29 patients). While appendectomy is curative for small appendiceal NET (< 2 cm) with an excellent prognosis [10], six patients underwent right hemicolectomy due to the large tumor size or surgical margin positivity in Şenel et al.’s [9] study. In addition, it was noticed in our study that NET was seen at a younger age than epithelial neoplasias.

Large intestine polyps showing a serrated morphology are divided into three groups as follows: hyperplastic polyps, SSRAs and traditional adenomas. SSRAs are mostly seen in the colon and rectum, but they are also observed in the appendix [11, 12]. There have been studies stating that SSRAs may cause acute appendicitis, especially in patients over 30 years of age. In our series, SSRA was observed in seven patients older than 30 years, with the eldest being 71 years old [7, 13]. Only one patient had traditional adenoma, which also had the malign potential [11, 12, 13].

Based on the work of Misdraji et al. [14] in 2003, as outlined in the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Digestive System Tumors (2019), malignant mucinous neoplasms of the appendix can be divided into two categories as follows: LGMN (characterized by a low-grade neoplastic mucinous epithelium with extracellular mucin and thrusting tumor margins) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (characterized by infiltrative invasion). LGMNs are commonly incidental in the appendix. Additional interventions (e.g., cytoreductive surgery) may be required according to the histological grade and degree of dissemination in the case of perforation and peritoneal dissemination (pseudomyxoma peritonei) [15]. In addition, radical appendectomy instead of right hemicolectomy is recommended for all high-stage epithelial neoplasias of the appendix in the literature [16].

Appendiceal MCAs are a type of appendix mucoceles; pathological distinctions from cystadenocarcinomas may be challenging [17]. Although appendiceal MCAs are rare neoplasms, they are reported at relatively high rates in some appendectomy series [18, 19]. Since appendectomy is curative, right hemicolectomy should be performed when there is suspicion of cystadenocarcinoma or the presence of free perforation [17, 19]. In the present series, when there were a proximal adenoma placement and surgical margin positivity, as well as a suspected case of MCA for malignancy, right hemicolectomy was performed.

5. Conclusions

Since appendectomy is one of the most common emergency procedures performed worldwide, the number of appendectomy pathologic specimens increases accordingly. As a result, pathologists are faced with an increased number of specimen observations. These specimens should be carefully studied by the pathologists since rare neoplasias of the appendix may be present. This is important for the prognosis of the patient and may require additional treatment modalities. Any delay in treatment modality may directly affect the outcome of the patient since the prognosis of the patient depends on whether a tumor is present.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for this study.

Author contributions

S.S.U., N.G. and A.K.Z. actively involved in the compilation of the data and drafting of this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions.

Funding

The authors declared that this study had received no financial support.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest and financial relationships.

Consent statement

Written informed consent was not necessary because no patient data have been included in the manuscript.

Human rights statement

This study was conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Availability of data and materials

The materials described in the manuscript will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes without breaching participant confidentiality.

References

Wagner M, Tubre DJ, Asensio JA. Evolution and current trends in the management of acute appendicitis. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2018; 98: 1005-1023.

[Google Scholar]

Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet. 2015; 386: 1278-1287.

[Google Scholar]

Becker P, Fichtner-Feigl S, Schilling D. Clinical management of appendicitis. Visceral Medicine. 2018; 34: 453-458.

[Google Scholar]

Sohn M, Agha A, Bremer S, Lehmann KS, Bormann M, Hochrein A. Surgical management of acute appendicitis in adults: a review of current techniques. International Journal of Surgery. 2017; 48: 232-239.

[Google Scholar]

Hatch QM, Gilbert EW. Appendiceal neoplasms. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2018; 31: 278-287.

[Google Scholar]

Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, Sartelli M, Cicuttin E, Sibilla MG, Leandro G, et al. Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. Acta Biomedica. 2018; 89: 119-134.

[Google Scholar]

Glasgow SC, Gaertner W, Stewart D, Davids J, Alavi K, Paquette IM, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Clinical practice guidelines for the management of appendiceal neoplasms. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2019; 62: 1425-1438.

[Google Scholar]

Eğin S, Kamalı G, Kamalı S, Gökçek B, Yeşiltaş M, Hot S, Karakaş DÖ. Neuroendocrine tumor of the appendix: twelve years of results from a single institution. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2019; 25: 118-122.

[Google Scholar]

Şenel F, Karaman H, Demir H. Neuroendocrine tumors detected in appendectomy specimens: ten-year single-center experience. Turkish Journal of Medical sciences. 2018; 48: 68-73.

[Google Scholar]

Pape UF, Niederle B, Costa F, Gross D, Kelestimur F, Kianmanesh R, et al. Vienna Consensus Conference participants ENETS consensus guidelines for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix (excluding goblet cell carcinomas). Neuroendocrinology. 2016; 103: 144-152.

[Google Scholar]

Bettington M, Brown IS, Rosty C. Serrated lesions of the appendix in serrated polyposis patients. Pathology. 2016; 48: 30-34.

[Google Scholar]

Yuyucu Karabulut Y, Savaş B, Kurşun N, Ensar A. Serrated lesions of the appendix: do they differ from their colorectal counterparts? Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014; 25: 29-34.

[Google Scholar]

Renshaw AA, Kish R, Gould EW. Sessile serrated adenoma is associated with acute appendicitis in patients 30 years or older. The American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2006; 126: 875-877.

[Google Scholar]

Wong M, Barrows B, Gangi A, Kim S, Mertens RB, Dhall D. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a single institution experience of 64 cases with clinical follow-up and correlation with the current (eighth edition) AJCC staging. International Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2020; 28: 252-258.

[Google Scholar]

Nutu OA, Marcacuzco Quinto AA, Manrique Municio A, Justo Alonso I, Calvo Pulido J, García-Conde M, et al. Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms: incidence, diagnosis and surgical treatment. Cirugía Española. 2017; 95: 321-327.

[Google Scholar]

González-Moreno S, Sugarbaker PH. Radical appendectomy as an alternative to right colon resection in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. Surgical Oncology. 2017; 26: 86-90.

[Google Scholar]

Shiihara M, Ohki T, Yamamoto M. Preoperative diagnosis and surgical approach of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma: usefulness of volcano sign. Case Reports in Gastroenterology. 2017; 11: 539-544.

[Google Scholar]

Dincel O, Goksu M, Turk BA, Pehlivanoglu B, Isler S. Unexpected findings in the routine histopathological examinations of appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis of 1,970 patients. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 2017; 88: 519-525.

[Google Scholar]

Agrusa A, Romano G, Galia M, Cucinella G, Sorce V, Di Buono G, et al. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: an uncertain nosological entity. Report of a case. Il Giornale di chirurgia. 2016; 37: 86-89.

[Google Scholar]