Signa Vitae. 2026; 22(3): 150-153. doi: 10.22514/sv.2026.026
Commentary

A simplified formula for rapid dilution of catecholamines in initial emergency and critical care resuscitation

Alessandro Belletti1, Chiara Mariotti1, Yuki Kotani2, Angelo Nascimbene3,*,, Ashish K. Khanna4,5

1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy

2Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 296-8602 Kamogawa, Japan

3Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX 77030, USA

4Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA

5Outcomes Research Consortium, Houston, TX 77030, USA

*Corresponding Author(s):angelo.nascimbene@uth.tmc.edu (Angelo Nascimbene)

History Submitted: 26 December 2025 | Accepted: 30 March 2026 | Published: 08 August 2026
Copyright:  ©2026 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Inotropes and vasopressors may require to be rapidly administered in emergency situations in any setting (pre-hospital resuscitation, hospital wards, intensive care units, emergency departments, operating theatres). Simple formulas to dilute drugs and set infusion rates may be of great help in emergency situations to improve efficiency, speed of administration, and limit mistakes. We propose a simple formula used for decades in our institution that rapidly allow to dilute and set infusion rates of commonly administered inotropes and vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine and dobutamine) by simply multiplying patient’s weight by 6. We believe that our formula will be of great help to any healthcare professionals in these fields of expertise.

Keywords:Inotropes;Vasopressors;Catecholamines;Shock;Hemodynamic management;Medical emergency
PDF(167.57 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Belletti A, Mariotti C, Kotani Y, Nascimbene A, Khanna AK. A simplified formula for rapid dilution of catecholamines in initial emergency and critical care resuscitation. Signa Vitae. 2026; 22(3): 150-153. doi: 10.22514/sv.2026.026

Vasoactive drugs are increasingly administered in emergency situations outside the intensive care unit (ICU), including in pre-hospital settings, the emergency department, and the operating room [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. In particular, vasopressors are frequently required to provide initial stabilization before reaching an ICU, and several studies suggest potential improvement in survival with early vasopressors administration [2, 5, 7]. For example, early initiation of norepinephrine infusion during prehospital care of septic shock patients was independently associated with a greater than 50% reduction in 30-day mortality [2].

Unfortunately, in these contexts, dilution errors are common but largely preventable [10, 11]. The use of simple formulas for drug dilution and infusion rate calculation is crucial in emergency situations to simplify tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce the possibility of mistakes [12, 13, 14]. We read with great interest the article by Alpar et al. [15] that introduces the “fast inotropic bag” (FiB) formula, providing a quick method to calculate doses for positive inotropic drug infusions. However, it has limitations and might not be applicable in all clinical contexts.

A simple unit conversion error led to the administration of an incorrect norepinephrine dose, ultimately resulting in the patient’s death—a stark reminder of the potentially fatal consequences of dosing errors with vasoactive agents [16, 17].

The FiB formula [15] is likely to help healthcare professionals in many emergency situations. However, we believe that the formula still has some limitations. Different drug formulations (such as bitartrate, tartrate, and hemitartrate [18, 19, 20, 21]) may be available in different institutions, limiting generalizability of the formula. These salt formulations have extra counterions that increase their molecular weight, so the actual amount of active norepinephrine base in a vial is less than the total weight listed [19, 21]. For example, our institution uses norepinephrine vials that contain 2 mg of norepinephrine tartrate in 1 mL, which corresponds to only 1 mg of norepinephrine base. This means that if a clinician calculates the dose assuming base but uses the salt formulation, a prescribed dose of 1 μg/kg/min would effectively deliver only about 0.5 μg/kg/min of active base [21]. To further complicate the picture, different salt formulations of norepinephrine are available [18, 19, 20, 21], containing different amounts of the pharmacologically active norepinephrine base molecule. Unfortunately, many clinicians are not yet aware of this issue and variably administer norepinephrine referring to the base or salt dose [22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. The lack of awareness regarding the specific norepinephrine formulation used concerned 50% of participants in a recent study assessing compliance with the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines [26]. There is a growing consensus regarding the need for the prospective implementation of a standardized reporting system based on norepinephrine base [27]. Therefore, considering a standard 4 mg/4 mL vial of norepinephrine in the FiB formula may lead to different dosing among different clinicians or institutions.

In addition, multiplying by 0.15 may not be immediate in many situations, decimal-based and multi-step calculations have been shown to substantially increase the risk of dosing errors, occurring in approximately 11% of preparations [28].

We therefore would like to propose an updated formula for rapid dilution of inotropes, based on practice that has been used in our institution for decades.

We use the following formula for epinephrine and norepinephrine (base): first multiply patient’s weight × 6 and then divide by 100. The resulting number is the amount of mg of epinephrine or norepinephrine base to be diluted in 100 mL of normal saline or 5% glucose. With this dilution, an infusion rate of 1 mL/h corresponds to a dose of 0.01 μg/kg/min, and an infusion rate of 10 mL/h corresponds to a dose of 0.1 μg/kg/min, regardless of patient’s weight. For dopamine and dobutamine, we apply the following formula: multiply patient’s weight × 6. The resulting number is the amount of mg of epinephrine or norepinephrine to be diluted in 100 mL of normal saline or 5% glucose. With this dilution, an infusion rate of 1 mL/h corresponds to a dose of 1 μg/kg/min, and an infusion rate of 10 mL/h corresponds to a dose of 10 μg/kg/min, regardless of patient’s weight (Table 1).

Table 1.Examples of practical use of the proposed formula.
DrugFormula for dilution
(mg in 100 mL)
Final concentration
(µg/mL)
Infusion rate equivalenceExamples
Epinephrine(Patient’s weight × 6)/10042 µg/mL (for 70 kg)
60 µg/mL (for 100 kg)
1 mL/h = 0.01 µg/kg/min
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
70 kg patient:
4.2 mg in 100 mL → 42 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
100 kg patient:
6 mg in 100 mL → 60 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
Norepinephrine(Patient’s weight × 6)/10042 µg/mL (for 70 kg)
60 µg/mL (for 100 kg)
1 mL/h = 0.01 µg/kg/min
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
70 kg patient:
4.2 mg in 100 mL → 42 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
100 kg patient:
6 mg in 100 mL → 60 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 0.1 µg/kg/min
Dopamine(Patient’s weight × 6)4200 µg/mL (for 70 kg)
6000 µg/mL (100 kg)
1 mL/h = 1 µg/kg/min
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min
70 kg patient:
420 mg in 100 mL → 4200 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min
100 kg patient:
600 mg in 100 mL → 6000 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min
Dobutamine(Patient’s weight × 6)4200 µg/mL (for 70 kg)
6000 µg/mL (for100 kg)
1 mL/h = 1 µg/kg/min
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min
70 kg patient:
420 mg in 100 mL → 4200 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min
100 kg patient:
600 mg in 100 mL → 6000 µg/mL
10 mL/h = 10 µg/kg/min

We believe that this simpler formula allows to rapidly calculate (even without a calculator) dilution and infusion dose of commonly administered inotropes and vasopressors in any emergency situations (for example, the pre-hospital setting [29] or emergencies in general wards) and may potentially reduce dilution mistakes. Furthermore, the resulting catecholamine concentrations in the diluted solution correspond to values that remain within the upper reported concentration range reported for short-term peripheral norepinephrine administration under monitored conditions [1, 30, 31]. For example, applying our formula yields concentrations of 42 μg/mL in a 70-kg patient and 60 μg/mL in a 100-kg patient, which has been reported to be administered also in peripheral venous lines.

Notably, the formula was never tested in prospective benchmarking against established preparation workflows; therefore, potential reductions in preparation time or calculation errors have not been formally demonstrated. The arithmetic simplicity of the formula might not necessarily translate into improved clinical performance, particularly under stressful conditions, where cognitive load, vial interpretation (base versus salt), and practical preparation steps may affect usability. Future prospective simulation-based studies are needed to determine the practical implications of this method in emergency settings.

We do not expect the described formula to replace standardized infusion protocols, smart infusion systems, or pre-diluted drugs. Rather, it is conceived as a pragmatic alternative for emergency situations or care environments in which pre-standardized concentrations, smart pump libraries, or ready-to-administer preparations are not readily available, including low-resource settings.

Another possible limitation of the formula we suggest is the need for elevated infusions rate in patients requiring high dose vasopressors. However, patients will likely receive catecholamines in these settings (pre-hospital, emergency departments, or general wards) for a relatively short period of time before either recovery or transfer to the ICU, where different protocols and dilutions could be used in a safer environment. In addition, we do believe that current practice of administration of combined, low-dose multiple vasopressors will make this situation unlikely [32, 33, 34].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. No individual patient data reported.

Author contributions

AB, CM—performed the research. YK, AN, AKK—formal analysis. AB, AKK—investigation. CM, YK, AN—data curation. AB, CM, AKK—wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

YK: Consulting Feed from Viatris.

AKK: Consulting Fees from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips Research North America, Bayer Corporation, AOP, GE Healthcare, Innoviva Therapeutics, Viatris, SERB pharmaceuticals, Pharmazz Inc., SCCM (council member), SCCM Surviving Sepsis Campaign (Research Committee member), SCCM ESICM consensus definition of refractory septic shock (co-chair). Ongoing support Wake Forest CTSI: RAAS dysfunction in septic shock and NIH/NHLBI R01HL177834-01: Dysfunctional Renin Angiotensin System in Septic Shock.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Alessandro Belletti and Ashish K. Khanna are serving as Editorial Board members of this journal. Yuki Kotani was a member of the Editorial Board of this journal at the time of submission. We declare that Alessandro Belletti, Ashish K. Khanna and Yuki Kotani had no involvement in the peer review of this article and have no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to GL.

References

Aykanat VM, Myles PS, Weinberg L, Burrell A, Bellomo R. Low-concentration norepinephrine infusion for major surgery: a safety and feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2022; 134: 410–418.

[Google Scholar]

Jouffroy R, Hajjar A, Gilbert B, Tourtier JP, Bloch-Laine E, Ecollan P, et al. Prehospital norepinephrine administration reduces 30-day mortality among septic shock patients. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22: 345.

[Google Scholar]

Morselli F, Vitali G, Brioschi E, Di Terlizzi G, Belletti A, Lombardi G, et al. Feasibility and safety of angiotensin II administration in general ward patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a case series. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 2020; 22: 388–390.

[Google Scholar]

Bloom JE, Ball J, Okyere D, Voskoboinik A, Dawson LP, Nelson AJ, et al.; PANDA Investigators. Design and rationale of a multicenter paramedic randomized trial of noradrenaline versus adrenaline in the initial management of patients with cardiogenic shock-The PANDA trial. American Heart Journal. 2026; 297: 107378.

[Google Scholar]

Bentsen LP, Strøm T, Forberg JL, Tiwald G, Biesenbach P, Kalmriz M, et al. Early initiated noradrenaline versus fluid therapy for hypotension and shock in the emergency department (VASOSHOCK): a protocol for a pragmatic, multi-center, superiority, randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2025; 33: 59.

[Google Scholar]

Sucena Rodrigues B, Caldeira D, Dantas J, Faria R. Push-dose pressors outside the operating room: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025; 79: 260–279.

[Google Scholar]

Shi R, Braïk R, Monnet X, Gu WJ, Ospina-Tascon G, Permpikul C, et al. Early norepinephrine for patients with septic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Critical Care. 2025; 29: 182.

[Google Scholar]

Cannavò L, Capitanio L, Beretta V, Raitano V, Perrone S. Early inotropic support in pediatric shock: evidence and challenges in prehospital setting and interfacility transport. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2026; 102: 180–189.

[Google Scholar]

Quinn E, Su J, Fei L, Liu J, Friedman M, Lobel D, et al. Perceptions and barriers to administering vasopressors in the prehospital setting. Cureus. 2022; 14: e29614.

[Google Scholar]

Gokhman R, Seybert AL, Phrampus P, Darby J, Kane-Gill SL. Medication errors during medical emergencies in a large, tertiary care, academic medical center. Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 482–487.

[Google Scholar]

Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Lockley SW, Burdick E, et al. The critical care safety study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Critical Care Medicine. 2005; 33: 1694–1700.

[Google Scholar]

Gupta P, Tuli V. Dopamine infusion: a simpler formula. Indian Pediatrics. 1994; 31: 868.

[Google Scholar]

Belletti A, Lerose CC, Zangrillo A, Landoni G. Vasoactive-inotropic score: evolution, clinical utility, and pitfalls. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2021; 35: 3067–3077.

[Google Scholar]

Kotani Y, Di Gioia A, Landoni G, Belletti A, Khanna AK. An updated “norepinephrine equivalent” score in intensive care as a marker of shock severity. Critical Care. 2023; 27: 29. Erratum in: Critical Care. 2025; 29: 104.

[Google Scholar]

Alpar S, Yilmaz S, Ak R. A shortcut for preparing doses of positive inotropic drug infusions in emergency patient management—”fast inotrope bag (FiB) coefficient”. Signa Vitae. 2023; 19: 224–226.

[Google Scholar]

Duby J, Schomer K, Oyewole V, Christian D, Young S. Norepinephrine dosing error associated with multiple health system vulnerabilities. 2021. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK616441/ (Accessed: 09 November 2025).

[Google Scholar]

Kane-Gill SL, Jacobi J, Rothschild JM. Adverse drug events in intensive care units: risk factors, impact, and the role of team care. Critical Care Medicine. 2010; 38: S83–S89.

[Google Scholar]

Leone M, Goyer I, Levy B, Dünser MW, Asfar P, Jentzer JC. Dose of norepinephrine: the devil is in the details. Intensive Care Medicine. 2022; 48: 638–640.

[Google Scholar]

Wieruszewski PM. Norepinephrine dosage: the details go beyond a grain of salt. Intensive Care Medicine. 2023; 49: 714–715.

[Google Scholar]

Kotani Y, Belletti A, D’Andria Ursoleo J, Salvati S, Landoni G. Norepinephrine dose should be reported as base equivalence in clinical research manuscripts. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2023; 37: 1523–1524.

[Google Scholar]

Wieruszewski PM, Leone M, Kaas-Hansen BS, Dugar S, Legrand M, McKenzie CA, et al. Position paper on the reporting of norepinephrine formulations in critical care from the society of critical care medicine and European society of intensive care medicine joint task force. Critical Care Medicine. 2024; 52: 521–530.

[Google Scholar]

Salvati S, D’Andria Ursoleo J, Belletti A, Monti G, Bonizzoni MA, Fazio M, et al. Norepinephrine salt formulations and risk of therapeutic error: results of a national survey. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2024; 38: 2624–2629.

[Google Scholar]

Morales S, Wendel-Garcia PD, Ibarra-Estrada M, Jung C, Castro R, Retamal J, et al. The impact of norepinephrine dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in septic shock patients. Critical Care. 2024; 28: 216.

[Google Scholar]

Goyer I, Thibault C, Marquis C, Kawaguchi A, Schlapbach L, Gibbons K, et al.; Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgence Pédiatrique (GFRUP) and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI). Use of norepinephrine in the pediatric intensive care unit: an international survey of prescription and administration habits in case of pediatric hypotensive shock. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2025; 184: 392.

[Google Scholar]

Goyer I, Lakbar I, Freund Y, Lévy B, Leone M. Norepinephrine dosing in France: time to move forward! Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2024; 43: 101397.

[Google Scholar]

Bitton E, Zimmerman S, Azevedo LCP, Benhamou D, Cecconi M, De Waele JJ, et al. An international survey of adherence to Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016 regarding fluid resuscitation and vasopressors in the initial management of septic shock. Journal of Critical Care. 2022; 68: 144–154.

[Google Scholar]

Ibarra-Estrada M, Kattan E, Jung C. Norepinephrine dose reporting: are we looking at different sides of the same coin? Intensive Care Medicine. 2024; 50: 1181–1182.

[Google Scholar]

Parshuram CS, To T, Seto W, Trope A, Koren G, Laupacis A. Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication. CMAJ. 2008; 178: 42–48.

[Google Scholar]

Bloom JE, Goel V, Anderson D, Cartledge S, Nehme Z, Ball J, et al. Current emergency medical service vasoactive use for the management of shock. Critical Care Explorations. 2024; 6: e1177.

[Google Scholar]

Tian DH, Smyth C, Keijzers G, Macdonald SP, Peake S, Udy A, et al. Safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications: a systematic review. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2020; 32: 220–227.

[Google Scholar]

Wu W, Yang X, Kou L. Extravasation, thrombosis, and infection with vasopressor infusion through peripheral intravenous catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2025; 15: 847–860.

[Google Scholar]

Chawla LS, Ostermann M, Forni L, Tidmarsh GF. Broad spectrum vasopressors: a new approach to the initial management of septic shock? Critical Care. 2019; 23: 124.

[Google Scholar]

Leone M, Einav S, Antonucci E, Depret F, Lakbar I, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Multimodal strategy to counteract vasodilation in septic shock. Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2023; 42: 101193.

[Google Scholar]

Kalamar Ž, Gorenjak M, Landoni G, Markota A. Early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock (TRICYCLE)—study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20: e0331304.

[Google Scholar]