Signa Vitae. 2026; 22(3): 175-176. doi: 10.22514/sv.2026.051
Correction

Correction: PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality

Mehmet Cagri Goktekin1,*,, Evrim Gul1, Feyza Aksu2

1Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Firat University, 23200 Elazig, Turkey

2Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Firat University, 23200 Elazig, Turkey

*Corresponding Author(s):mc.goktekin@firat.edu.tr (Mehmet Cagri Goktekin)

History Published: 08 August 2026
Copyright:  ©2026 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

No abstract available.

Keywords:None.
PDF(145.61 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Goktekin MC, Gul E, Aksu F. Correction: PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality. Signa Vitae. 2026; 22(3): 175-176. doi: 10.22514/sv.2026.051

In the originally published article [1] (DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.012), post-publication review by the Editorial Office identified a labeling error in Table 2 and an ambiguous statement in the Discussion section.

In collaboration with the authors, the following corrections have been made in this Correction:

1. Table 2—subheading error

The subheadings “Exitus” and “No re-admission to the emergency department” were mistakenly interchanged under the “Evaluation after 3 months” and “Evaluation after 6 months” sections. This appears to have occurred inadvertently during the translation from Turkish to English.

The numerical values and statistical results remain unchanged. The corrected Table 2 is provided below:

Table 2.Comparisons by sarcopenia and frailty risk status.
ParametersGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4p-value
Gender
- Male18 (64.3)11 (57.9)7 (50.0)38 (42.7)0.201
- Female10 (35.7)8 (42.1)7 (50.0)51 (57.3)
Complaints
- General condition disorder1 (3.6)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)10 (11.2)0.090
- Infectious causes4 (14.3)3 (15.8)1 (7.1)5 (5.6)
- Cardiovascular causes15 (53.6)3 (15.8)5 (35.7)17 (19.1)
- Pulmonary causes1 (3.6)2 (10.5)2 (14.3)15 (16.9)
- Gastrointestinal causes3 (10.7)2 (10.5)1 (7.1)16 (18.0)
- Other2 (7.1)5 (26.3)2 (14.3)18 (20.2)
- Neurological causes2 (7.1)2 (10.5)3 (21.4)8 (9.0)
Comorbidities
- Asthma1 (3.6)1 (5.3)5 (35.7)20 (22.5)0.017
- CHD-CHF12 (42.9)12 (63.2)3 (21.4)50 (56.2)0.052
- DM6 (21.4)8 (42.1)0 (0.0)29 (32.6)0.034
- HT16 (57.1)12 (63.2)9 (64.3)46 (51.7)0.696
- Dementia0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)6 (6.7)0.232
- Malignancy1 (3.6)3 (15.8)2 (14.3)9 (10.1)0.516
Outcome
- Discharged17 (60.7)7 (36.8)10 (71.4)40 (44.9)0.090
- Exitus0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (3.4)
- Transfer to service7 (25.0)10 (52.6)3 (21.4)33 (37.1)
- Transfer to intensive care4 (14.3)2 (10.5)1 (7.1)13 (14.6)
Evaluation after 1 month
- Re-admission to the emergency department5 (17.9)9 (47.4)6 (42.9)26 (29.2)0.001
- No re-admission to the emergency department22 (78.6)10 (52.6)7 (50.0)38 (42.7)
- Exitus1 (3.6)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)25 (28.1)
Evaluation after 3 months
- Re-application to the emergency department9 (33.3)7 (36.8)2 (15.4)19 (29.7)0.253
- Exitus0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)6 (9.4)
- No re-admission to the emergency department18 (66.7)12 (63.2)11 (84.6)39 (60.9)
Evaluation after 6 months
- Re-application to the emergency department11 (40.7)5 (26.3)4 (30.8)13 (22.4)0.427
- Exitus0 (0.0)1 (5.3)0 (0.0)5 (8.6)
- No re-admission to the emergency department16 (59.3)13 (68.4)9 (69.2)40 (69.0)
Re-admission to the emergency department during the follow-up process15 (53.6)12 (63.2)9 (64.3)38 (42.7)0.215
Latest status at the end of follow-up
- Survivor27 (96.4)18 (94.7)13 (92.9)53 (59.6)<0.001
- Exitus1 (3.6)1 (5.3)1 (7.1)36 (40.4)
Age, yr, mean ± SD74 ± 575 ± 680 ± 980 ± 8<0.001
Number of medicines, median (min.–max.)4 (0–14)4 (1–10)4 (1–12)5 (0–14)0.004
PRISMA-7 score, median (min.–max.)2 (1–2)2 (1–2)4 (3–6)5 (3–7)<0.001
SARC-F score, median (min.–max.)0 (0–3)6 (4–9)3 (0–3)8 (4–10)<0.001
CHD: Coronary Heart Disease; CHF: Chronic Heart Failure; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; HT: Hypertension; PRISMA-7: Program on Research for Integrating Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 item questionnaire; SARC-F: A Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia; SD: Standard Deviation; min.: Minimum; max.: Maximum.

2. Discussion section—Ambiguous statement

The following sentence has been clarified for accuracy in this Correction:

Original text: “The mortality rate was higher in those who were readmitted to the ED than those who did not (10.8% vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001).”

Corrected text: “The mortality rate was higher in patients requiring re-admission to ED (40.8%) vs. those without (10.8%) (p < 0.001).”

The authors confirm that these corrections apply solely to Table 2 and the Discussion section. The study design, methods, other data, and conclusions presented in the published article remain unchanged and are unaffected by these corrections.

The authors sincerely apologize for these inaccuracies and any inconvenience caused. This Correction has been approved by the Editor-in-Chief. The original article PDF remains available as published and has not been altered. Readers are advised to refer to this Correction for the corrected Table 2 and the clarified statement in the Discussion section.

References

Goktekin MC, Gul E, Aksu F. PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality. Signa Vitae. 2025; 21: 97–105.

[Google Scholar]