Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Correction: Comparison of mNutric score and NRS-2002 screening tools in neurosurgery intensive care units
1Department of Neurosurgery, Kayseri City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 38080 Kayseri, Turkey
2Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, 38170 Kayseri, Turkey
*Corresponding Author(s):suleGOKTURK@outlook.com (Şule Göktürk)
| History | Published: 08 August 2026 |
| Copyright: | ©2026 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press. |
No abstract available.
Cite this article
Göktürk Ş, Göktürk Y, Çapar AG, Başmısırlı E, Aykemat Y, İnanç N. Correction: Comparison of mNutric score and NRS-2002 screening tools in neurosurgery intensive care units. Signa Vitae. 2026; 22(3): 190-190. doi: 10.22514/sv.2026.062
In the originally published article [1] (DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.057), post-publication review by the Editorial Office identified that References [17] and [19] did not fully support the corresponding statements, and the statement in the Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate section was inaccurate.
In collaboration with the authors, the following corrections have been made in this Correction:
1. References [17] and [19]
These references did not accurately support the statements in the Methods and Discussion sections. They have been replaced with more appropriate citations:
[17] Hersberger L, Bargetzi L, Bargetzi A, Tribolet P, Fehr R, Baechli V, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002) is a strong and modifiable predictor risk score for short-term and long-term clinical outcomes: secondary analysis of a prospective randomised trial. Clinical Nutrition. 2020; 39: 2720–2729.
[19] Zhou J, Luo XY, Li HL, Shi GZ, Chen GQ. Comparison of the predictive value of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P scores for in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients after craniotomy: a retrospective cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital. BMJ Open. 2026; 16: e101867.
2. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate section
Original text: “Consent for participation was obtained from all subjects.”
Corrected text: “Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of fully anonymized data, the requirement for obtaining informed consent from individual patients was waived by the Ethics Committee.”
The authors confirm that these corrections are limited to reference appropriateness and clarification of the ethics statement, and they do not affect the scientific content, results, interpretations, or conclusions of the original study.
The authors sincerely apologize for these inaccuracies and any inconvenience caused. This Correction has been approved by the Editor-in-Chief. The original article PDF remains available as published and has not been altered. Readers are advised to refer to this Correction for the updated references and the corrected ethics statement.