Article Data

  • Views 3387
  • Dowloads 156

Original Research

Open Access

Influence of rescuer strength and shift cycle time on chest compression quality

  • HYUNJONG KIM1
  • JE SUNG YOU2
  • SUNG PHIL CHUNG2

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Gyeonggido, Korea

2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

DOI: 10.22514/SV131.052017.29 Vol.13,Issue 1,March 2017 pp.70-74

Published: 20 March 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): SUNG PHIL CHUNG E-mail: emstar@yuhs.ac

Abstract

Introduction. Previous studies have sug-gested that differences in rescuer strength and compression shift cycle are strongly associated with the quality of chest com-pression. We hypothesised that changing the shift cycle from two minutes to one would have a positive effect on the qual-ity of chest compression in two-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), re-gardless of rescuer strength.

Methods.Thirty-nine senior medical stu-dents participated in this prospective, simulation-based, crossover study. Af-ter evaluation of muscle strength using a handgrip dynamometer, each participant was required to perform two sets of com-pressions separated by a 15-minute rest. Participants started with either four cycles of chest compressions for one minute fol-lowed by a one-minute rest (1-MCS), or with two cycles of chest compressions for two minutes followed by a two-minute rest (2-MCS). After a 15-minute break, participants switched groups and per-formed the other set of compressions. Mean compression depth (MCD), mean adequate compression (MAC), and ade-quate compression ratio (ACR) per minute were measured for each group. Subjective fatigue was reported after the completion of each set of compression cycles. Results. Rescuer strength was strongly correlated with MCD (p <0.01), MAC ratio (p <0.01), and ACR (p <0.01), and cycle group was correlated with MCD (p <0.01) and ACR (p =0.03). Subjective fatigue with 1-MCS was lower than with 2-MCS, regardless of rescuer strength.

Conclusion. We found that the quality of chest compressions could be improved by changing the shift cycle from two min-utes to one, regardless of rescuer strength. Therefore, reducing the existing shift cycle recommended in guidelines for two rescu-ers could be beneficial.


Keywords

CPR, fatigue, hand strength

Cite and Share

HYUNJONG KIM,JE SUNG YOU,SUNG PHIL CHUNG. Influence of rescuer strength and shift cycle time on chest compression quality. Signa Vitae. 2017. 13(1);70-74.

References

1. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopul-monary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emer-gency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35.

2. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castren M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81-99.

3. Ashton A, McCluskey A, Gwinnutt CL, Keenan AM. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compres-sions over 3 min. Resuscitation 2002;55(2):151-5.

4. Heidenreich JW, Berg RA, Higdon TA, Ewy GA, Kern KB, Sanders AB. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-com-pression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2006;13(10):1020-6.

5. Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Em Med 1995;26(3):300-3.

6. Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Lisa V, Saralegui I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998;37(3):149-52.

7. Hansen D, Vranckx P, Broekmans T, Eijnde BO, Beckers W, Vandekerckhove P, et al. Physical fitness affects the quality of single operator cardiocerebral resuscitation in healthcare professionals. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2012;19(1):28-34.

8. Ock SM, Kim YM, Chung J, Kim SH. Influence of physical fitness on the performance of 5-minute continuous chest compression. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2011;18(5):251-6.

9. Russo SG, Neumann P, Reinhardt S, Timmermann A, Niklas A, Quintel M, et al. Impact of physical fitness and biometric data on the quality of external chest compression: a randomised, crossover trial. BMC Em Med 2011;11:20.

10. Bassey EJ, Harries UJ. Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin Sci 1993;84(3):331-7.

11. Machover S. Relationship of muscle strength of back and upper extremity with level of physical activity in healthy women. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists. 1989;68(6):300-1.

12. Milliken LA, Faigenbaum AD, Loud RL, Westcott WL. Correlates of upper and lower body muscular strength in children. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2008;22(4):1339-46.

13. Foo NP, Chang JH, Lin HJ, Guo HR. Rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions: A randomized controlled crosso-ver trial. Resuscitation 2010;81(5):579-84.

14. Pozner CN, Almozlino A, Elmer J, Poole S, McNamara D, Barash D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Em Med 2011;29(6):618-25.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) (On Hold)

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024)

Embase

Submission Turnaround Time

Top