Article Data

  • Views 8769
  • Dowloads 168

Original Research

Open Access

Why should we switch chest compression providers every 2 minutes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

  • SANG DAE LEE1
  • JUN YOUNG HONG1
  • JE HYEOK OH1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/SV142.102018.4 Vol.14,Issue 2,November 2018 pp.31-34

Published: 02 November 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): JE HYEOK OH E-mail: jehyeokoh@cau.ac.kr

Abstract

Objective. This study was conducted to determine whether trained male rescuers could maintain adequate chest compres-sion depth (CCD) for longer than the cur-rent recommended guidelines of 2 minutes. Methods. Forty male medical doctors ad-ministered a 5-minute single rescuer car-diopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a manikin on the floor with conventional CPR or randomly administered continu-ous chest compressions (CCC). The ratio of compression to ventilation was set to 30:2 with mouth-to-mouth technique dur-ing conventional CPR. Chest compression data were recorded with an accelerometer device and divided into 1-minute segments for analysis.

Results. Although average CCD main-tained the recommended depths through-out 5 minutes in conventional CPR, it de-creased significantly with CCC (1 minute: 55.4 ± 4.5 mm; 2 minutes: 54.2 ± 5.4 mm; 3 minutes: 52.6 ± 5.6 mm; 4 minutes: 51.6 ± 5.5 mm; 5 minutes: 49.9 ± 5.8 mm, p < 0.001). The average chest compression numbers (ACCN) per minute were main-tained over 80/min and have not been changed significantly within 5 minutes in the CCC. However, it didn’t reach to the 80/min and decreased significantly after 3minutes compared to the baseline ACCN during first 1-minute segment in the con-ventional CPR.

Conclusions. Despite the chest compres-sion providers being limited to trained male medical doctors, the average CCD decreased significantly within 5minutes with CCC. Although maintaining adequate CCD, ACCN in each minute decreased sig-nificantly after 3minutes in the conventional CPR. Therefore, we should rotate chest compression providers every 2minutes re-gardless of the rescuer’s qualifications and CPR methods.

Keywords

cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, cardiac ar-rest, healthcare provider

Cite and Share

SANG DAE LEE,JUN YOUNG HONG,JE HYEOK OH. Why should we switch chest compression providers every 2 minutes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?. Signa Vitae. 2018. 14(2);31-34.

References

1. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, et al. Part 7: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132: S444-64.

2. Sugerman NT, Edelson DP, Leary M, Weidman EK, Herzberg DL, Vanden Hoek TL, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 981-4.

3. Shin J, Hwang SY, Lee HJ, Park CJ, Kim YJ, Son YJ, et al. Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014; 22: 59.

4. Lopez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Rovira-Gil E, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Ferrer-Lopez V, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Sex differences in the effort indicators during cardiopulmonary resuscitation manoeuvres on manikins. Eur J Emerg Med 2015; 22: 62-5.

5. Oh JH, Kim CW. Relationship between chest compression depth and novice rescuer body weight during cardiopulmonary resus-citation. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 2411-3.

6. Lopez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Lopez M, Garcia-Hermoso A, Lopez-Tendero J, Rabanales-Sotos J, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Muscular fitness as a mediator of quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 1845-9.

7. Lin CC, Kuo CW, Ng CJ, Li WC, Weng YM, Chen JC. Rescuer factors predict high-quality CPR-a manikin-based study of health care providers. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34: 20-4.

8. Hong DY, Park SO, Lee KR, Baek KJ, Shin DH. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 353-9.

9. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support and cardiopulmo-nary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emer-gency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132: S414-35.

10. Oh JH, Kim CW, Kim SE, Lee SJ, Lee DH. Comparison of chest compressions in the standing position beside a bed at knee level and the kneeling position: a non-randomised, single-blind, cross-over trial. Emerg Med J 2014; 31: 533-5.

11. Sample size estimation. Centre for Clinical Research and Biostatistics. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Available from URL: http://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/Means.htm. accessed on June 2 2015.

12. Oh JH. A new strategy for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Commentary to the article: “The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation” published in “Kardiologia Polska” 2017; 75, 1: 21-27. Kardiol Pol 2017; 75: 87-8.

13. Contri E, Cornara S, Somaschini A, Dossena C, Tonani M, Epis F, et al. Complete chest recoil during laypersons’ CPR: Is it a matter of weight? Am J Emerg Med 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.060.

14. Abelairas-Gómez C, Barcala-Furelos R, Szarpak Ł, García-García O, Paz-Domínguez Á, López-García S, et al. Strength training effects on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol 2017; 75: 21-7.

15. Roh YS, Lim EJ. Factors influencing quality of chest compression depth in nursing students. Int J Nurs Pract 2013; 19: 591-5.

16. Krikscionaitiene A, Stasaitis K, Dambrauskiene M, Dambrauskas Z, Vaitkaitiene E, Dobozinskas P, et al. Can lightweight rescuers adequately perform CPR according to 2010 resuscitation guideline requirements? Emerg Med J 2013; 30: 159-60.

17. Hansen D, Vranckx P, Broekmans T, Eijnde BO, Beckers W, Vandekerckhove P, et al. Physical fitness affects the quality of single operator cardiocerebral resuscitation in healthcare professionals. Eur J Emerg Med 2012; 19: 28-34.

18. Ock SM, Kim YM, Chung J, Kim SH. Influence of physical fitness on the performance of 5-minute continuous chest compression. Eur J Emerg Med 2011; 18: 251-6.

19. Oh JH. A trade-off relationship between chest compression depth and chest wall recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35(10):1572-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.028.

20. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, Alvarado JP, O’Hearn N, Wigder HN, et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005; 111: 428-34.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) (On Hold)

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024)

Embase

Submission Turnaround Time

Top