Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Prenatal echocardiography – the impact on neonatal management
1Department of Neonatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
2 Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
*Corresponding Author(s): IWONA JAŃCZEWSKA E-mail: ijan@gumed.edu.pl
Congenital heart disease (CHD) results in neonatal morbidity and mortality. Prenatal diagnosis allows preparing an appropriate perinatal and postnatal care. Babies born in low-risk level sites with unexpected CHD may have poorer outcomes. The pur-pose of this study was to compare results of foetal echocardiography to postnatal findings and assess the impact of antenatal suspicions of CHD on postnatal manage-ment. Medical records of mother-infant pairs with CHD admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Medi-cal University of Gdansk from 01.01. to 31.12.2013 were reviewed. We analysed if the defect was detected pre- or postnatally, and if the diagnosis was made by the ob-stetrician from low-risk level sites (level I) or from a tertiary care centre (level II so-nography). The overall incidence of CHD was 68 (3,4%). Critical congenital heart de-fects (CCHD) were found in 24 neonates (1,2%), 21 were diagnosed prenatally, 3 were transferred from 1st level units. Correlation between prenatal diagnosis made at our centre and postnatal findings was achieved in 47,7%. Accuracy in all prenatal and postnatal findings for both I and II sonography levels was 35,2%. There were major differences in the dispropor-tion of the great vessels and postnatal confirmation of coarctation of the aorta (CoAo) (7,1%). We obtained a high ac-curacy of prenatal and postnatal findings in detection of lesions such as Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF), transposition of the great ar-teries (TGA), DORV (double outlet right ventricle) and Critical Pulmonary Steno-sis, which require an outflow tract view (92,9% of cases). Conclusions: We con-firmed increasing diagnostic rates when the diagnostics is performed at a tertiary care centre. These results are in agreement with literature stating that prenatal detec-tion of CoAo is still challenging. Despite the high rates of misdiagnosis, ma-jority of infants benefited from prenatally diagnosed CCHD.
critical congenital heart disease, foetal, neonatal echocardiography, prenatal diagnosis.
IWONA JAŃCZEWSKA,IWONA DOMŻALSKA-POPADIUK,ZBIGNIEW ŚWIĄTEK-BRZEZIŃSKI. Prenatal echocardiography – the impact on neonatal management. Signa Vitae. 2018. 14(2);51-60.
1. Meberg A, Lindberg H, Thaulow, E. Congenital heart defects: The patients who die. Acta Paediatr 2007;94(8):1060–65. http://doi. org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02046.x
2. Khoshnood B, Lelong N, Houyel L, Thieulin AC, Jouannic JM, Magnier S, et al. Prevalence, timing of diagnosis and mortality of newborns with congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Heart 2012;98(22):1667-73.
3. Pinto NM, Keenan HT, Minich LL, Puchalski MD, Heywood M, Botto LD. Barriers to prenatal detection of congenital heart dis-ease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40(4):418–25. http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.10116
4. Buyens A, Gyselaers W, Coumans A, Al Nasiry, S, Willekes C, Boshoff, D, et al. Difficult prenatal diagnosis: fetal coarctation. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(4):230–6. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753914
5. Evans W, Castillo W, Rollins R, Luna C, Kip K, Ludwick J, et al Moving towards universal prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease in southern Nevada: a community-wide program. Pediatr Cardiol 2015;36(2):281-8. doi:10.1007/s00246-014-0996-1.
6. Hill GD, Block JR, Tanem JB, Frommelt MA. Disparities in the prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2015;35(9):859-63. doi:10.1002/pd.4622.
7. Colby C. E, Carey WA, Blumenfeld YJ, Hintz SR. Infants with prenatally diagnosed anomalies: special approaches to preparation and resuscitation. Clin Perinatol 2012;39(4):871–87. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2012.09.012
8. Donofrio MT, Levy RJ, Schuette JJ, Skurow-Todd K, Sten M-B, Stallings C, et al. Specialized delivery room planning for fetuses with critical congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2013;111(5):737–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.029
9. Allan LD, Huggon IC. Counselling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2004;24(13):1136–42. http://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1071
10. Meberg A. Critical heart defects-the diagnostic challenge. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(11):1480-83. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00975.x.
11. Słodki M, Respondek-Liberska M, Pruetz JD, Donofrio MT. 2016; Fetal cardiology: changing the definition of critical heart disease in the newborn. J Perinatol 36(8): 575–80. http://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.20
12. Berkley EMF, Goens MB, Karr S, Rappaport V. Utility of fetal echocardiography in postnatal management of infants with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2009;29(7):654–8. http://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2260
13. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001;103(9):1269-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11238272.
14. Garne E, Stoll C, Clementi M, Euroscan Group. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experi-ence from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17(5):386–91. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x
15. Oster ME, Kim CH, Kusano AS, Cragan JD, Dressler P, Hales AR, et al. A population-based study of the association of prenatal diagnosis with survival rate for infants with congenital heart defects. Am J Cardiol 2014;113(6):1036–40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. amjcard.2013.11.066
16. Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ, Tong E, Nourse J, Sorenson B, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2009;155(1):26–31.e1. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.050
17. Marek J, Tomek V, Skovránek J, Povysilová V, Samánek M. Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unse-lected national population: a 21-year experience. Heart 2011;97(2):124-30. doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.206623.
18. Acherman RJ, Evans WN, Luna CF, Rollins R, Kip K, Collazos J, et al.Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in southern Nevada: the need for universal fetal cardiac evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26(12):1715-9-1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18029923.
19. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation 2011;123(8):841-9. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958405.
20. Trivedi N, Levy D, Tarsa M, Anton T, Hartney C, Wolfson T, et al. Congenital cardiac anomalies: prenatal readings versus neonatal outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(3):389–99. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368129
21. Meyer-Wittkopf M, Cooper S, Sholler G. Correlation between fetal cardiac diagnosis by obstetric and pediatric cardiologist so-nographers and comparison with postnatal findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17(5):392–7. http://doi.org/10.1046 /j.1469-0705.2001.00381.
22. Friedman AH, Kleinman CS, Copel JA. Diagnosis of cardiac defects: where we’ve been, where we are and where we’re going. Prenat Diagn 2002;22(4):280–4. http://doi.org/10.1002/pd.305
23. Gonçalves LF, Bronsteen R, Lee W. Fetal heart: a 4-chamber view is not enough. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55(1):266-280. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446df0.
24. Simpson JM. Impact of fetal echocardiography. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2009;2(1):41-50. doi:10.4103/0974-2069.52806.
25. Allan L, Dangel J, Fesslova V, Marek J, Mellander M, Oberhansli I, et al. Recommendations for the practice of fetal cardiology in Europe. Cardiol Young 2004;14(1):109-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15237685.
26. Slodki M, Rychik J, Moszura T, Janiak K, Respondek-Liberska M. Measurement of the great vessels in the mediastinum could help distinguish true from false-positive coarctation of the aorta in the third trimester. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28(10):1313-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19778876.
27. Chung ML, Lee BS, Kim EA-R, Kim K-S, Pi S-Y, Oh YM, et al. Impact of fetal echocardiography on trends in disease patterns and out-comes of congenital heart disease in a neonatal intensive care unit. Neonatology 2010;98(1):41–6. http://doi.org/10.1159/000264673
28. Clur SA, Van Brussel PM, Ottenkamp J, Bilardo CM. Prenatal diagnosis of cardiac defects: accuracy and benefit. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(5):450-5. doi:10.1002/pd.3837.
29. Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR. Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(6):631-8. doi:10.1002/uog.14882.
30. Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP, Goin JE, Clark BJ. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic mor-bidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2001;107(6):1277-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub-med/11389243.
31. Franklin O, Burch M, Manning N, Sleeman K, Gould S, Archer N. Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity. Heart 2002;87(1):67-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11751670.
32. Escobar-Diaz MC, Freud LR, Bueno A, Brown D, Friedman K, Schidlow D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries over a 20-year period: improved but imperfect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(6):678-82. doi:10.1002/uog.14751.
33. McGovern E, Sands AJ. Perinatal management of major congenital heart disease. Ulster Med J 2014;83(3):135-9. http://www.pub-medcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4255832&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed January 4, 2016.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) (On Hold)
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index
Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024)
Embase
Top