Article Data

  • Views 404
  • Dowloads 11

Original Research

Open Access

Using age, arterial lactate level and sequential organ failure assessment score in risk stratification of sepsis syndromes

  • AMR ELMORSI1
  • AMR DAHROUG1
  • ENAL FAHMY1
  • ISLAM AHMED2

1Critical Care Medicine Department – Alexandria University, Egypt

2 Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice Department – Damanhour University, Egypt

DOI: 10.22514/SV151.042019.6 Vol.15,Issue 1,April 2019 pp.46-50

Published: 23 April 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): AMR ELMORSI E-mail: Amrabdalla1971icu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: In low income countries, ICU places are limited and not all sepsis patients will benefit from ICU admission. Stratification is an important step to iden-tify patients who require ICU treatment from patients who can be treated on gen-eral ward setting. Improper stratification results in increased length of stay, costs, morbidity and mortality. Objective: The aim of this study was to stratify the risk of mortality in patients with sepsis syn-drome using age, arterial lactate level and SOFA score. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 250 patients with sepsis were enrolled and followed up un-til discharge. They were categorized into 2 groups according to 7-days mortality. Re-sults: SOFA score (≥5) was the only good tool (AUC=0.722) while age (≥65 years) (AUC=0.650) and arterial lactate (≥3.25 mmol/L) (0.690) were fair tools to predict 7-days mortality. A new score “ALSOFA score” (≥10) was an excellent tool for pre-diction (AUC =0.912, 95%CI: 0.851 to 0.940, p<0.0001). It showed an excellent sensitivity (90.9%) and specificity (85.1%). Conclusion: In critically ill patients with sepsis syndromes, age, arterial lactate and SOFA score are fair tools of stratification. No single marker/score can be used alone to stratify such patients.

Keywords

Emergency, Critical, Sepsis, SOFA, Arterial Lactate, Stratification

Cite and Share

AMR ELMORSI,AMR DAHROUG,ENAL FAHMY,ISLAM AHMED. Using age, arterial lactate level and sequential organ failure assessment score in risk stratification of sepsis syndromes. Signa Vitae. 2019. 15(1);46-50.

References

1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315(8):801-10.

2. Jawad I, Lukšić I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. J Glob Health 2012;2(1):1-4.

3. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193(3):259-72.

4. Kennedy M, Joyce N, Howell MD, Mottley JL, Shapiro NI. Identifying infected emergency department patients admitted to the hos-pital ward at risk of clinical deterioration and intensive care unit transfer. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17(10):1080-5.

5. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA2016;315(8):801-10.

6. de Groot B, Lameijer J, de Deckere ER, Vis A. The prognostic performance of the predisposition, infection, response and organ failure (PIRO) classification in high-risk and low-risk emergency department sepsis populations: comparison with clinical judgement and sepsis category. Emerg Med J 2014;31(4):292-300.

7. Rubulotta F, Marshall JC, Ramsay G, Nelson D, Levy M, Williams M. Predisposition, insult/infection, response, and organ dysfunc-tion: A new model for staging severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2009;37(4):1329-35.

8. Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Moore RB, Smith E, Burdick E, Bates DW. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a pro-spectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule. Crit Care Med 2003;31(3):670-5.

9. Sivayoham N, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. The MISSED score, a new scoring system to predict Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emer-gency Department: a derivation and validation study. Eur J Emerg Med.2014;21(1):30-6.

10. Vincent J-L, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10.

11. Opal SM, Girard TD, Ely EW. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41 Suppl 7:S504-12.

12. Schlapbach LJ, MacLaren G, Straney L. Venous vs arterial lactate and 30-day mortality in pediatric sepsis. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171(8):813-.

13. de Groot B, Stolwijk F, Warmerdam M, Lucke JA, Singh GK, Abbas M, et al. The most commonly used disease severity scores are inappropriate for risk stratification of older emergency department sepsis patients: an observational multi-centre study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017;25:91.

14. Warmerdam M, Stolwijk F, Boogert A, Sharma M, Tetteroo L, Lucke J, et al. Initial disease severity and quality of care of emergency department sepsis patients who are older or younger than 70 years of age. PloS one. 2017;12(9):e0185214.

15. Ginde AA, Moss M, Shapiro NI, Schwartz RS. Impact of older age and nursing home residence on clinical outcomes of US emergency department visits for severe sepsis. J Crit Care 2013;28(5):606-11.

16. Yang Y, Yang KS, Hsann YM, Lim V, Ong BC. The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care 2010;25(3):398-405.

17. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med 2006;34(1):15-21.

18. Paquet AL, Valli V, Philippon AL, Devilliers C, Bloom B, Hausfater P, et al. Agreement between arterial and venous lactate in emer-gency department patients: a prospective study of 157 consecutive patients. Eur J Emerg Med 2018;25(2):92-6.

19. 19. Theerawit P, Na Petvicharn C, Tangsujaritvijit V, Sutherasan Y. The correlation between arterial lactate and venous lactate in patients with sepsis and septic shock. J Intensive Care Med2018;33(2):116-20.

20. Datta D, Grahamslaw J, Gray AJ, Graham C, Walker CA. Lactate - Arterial and venous agreement in sepsis: a prospective observa-tional study. Eur J Emerg Med 2018;25(2):85-91.

21. Diao MY, Wang T, Cui YL, Lin ZF. [Prognostic value of arterial lactate content combined with base excess in patients with sepsis: a retrospective study]. Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue. 2013;25(4):211-4.

22. Innocenti F, Tozzi C, Donnini C, De Villa E, Conti A, Zanobetti M, et al. SOFA score in septic patients: incremental prognostic value over age, comorbidities, and parameters of sepsis severity. Intern Emerg Med2018;13(3):405-12.

23. Garcia-Villalba E, Cano-Sanchez A, Alcaraz-Garcia A, Cinesi-Gomez C, Pinera-Salmeron P, Marin I, et al. [Nomogram to predict a poor outcome in emergency patients with sepsis and at low risk of organ damage according to Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assess-ment (SOFA)]. Emergencias2017;29(2):81-6.

24. Macdonald SP, Arendts G, Fatovich DM, Brown SG. Comparison of PIRO, SOFA, and MEDS scores for predicting mortality in emer-gency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Acad Emerg Med2014;21(11):1257-63.

25. Bewersdorf JP, Hautmann O, Kofink D, Abdul Khalil A, Zainal Abidin I, Loch A. The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emer-gency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool. Eur J Emerg Med 2017;24(3):170-5.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top