Thoracic electrical bioimpedance theory and clinical possibilities in perioperative medicine

This article is a short review of thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) theory and clinical capabilities. Cardiac output measurement is used primarily to guide therapy in complex, critically ill patients. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance is one of several noninvasive techniques that have been investigated to measure cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters. Opinions in current literature continue to be conflicting as to the utility of thoracic electrical bioimpedance to that purpose. There is a limited number of good designed studies but they imply TEB is an accurate and reliable noninvasive method for determining cardiac output/cardiac index and it would be valuable for patients and circumstances in which intracardiac pressures and mixed venous blood samples are not necessary.

bioimpedance, non-inva-sive hemodynamic monitoring, cardi-ac output, pulmonary artery catheter, thermo dilution

1. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, Wagner D, et al, editors. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996;276:889 –97.

2. Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 2003;123:2028–33.

3. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al, editors. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77.

4. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Grant RF. A randomized controlled trial of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:5–14.

5. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Nathan RC, Thompson JL. Multicomponent noninvasive physiologic monitoring of circulatory function. Crit Care Med 1988;16:482–90.

6. Milzman PD, Hogan C, Zlindenny A, Battiata A, Janchar T. The utility of thoracic impedance to evaluate chest radiograph changes from acute heart failure patients in the emergency department. 1998;4(3):37.

7. Koksoy C, Kuzu MA, Kurt I, Kurt N, Yerdel MA, Tezcan C, et al, editors. Hemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative study using bioimpedance cardiography. Br J Surg 1995;82:972-4.

8. Castor G, Molter G, Helms J, Niedermark I, Altmayer P. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure–noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1990;5:544-6.

9. Van De Water MJ, Miller WT, Vogel LR, Mount EB, Dalton LM. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 2003;123:2028-33.

10.Thangathurai D, Charbonnet C, Roessler P, Wo CC, Mikhail M, Yoahida R, et al, editors. Continuous intraoperative noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using a new thoracic bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:440-4.

11. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Bishop MH, Appel PL, Van de Water JM, Harrington GR, et al, editors. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical Bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation. Crit Care Med 1994;22(12):1907-12.

12.Asensio J, Demetriades D, Berne T, Shoemaker W. Invasive and noninvasive monitoring for early recognition and treatment of shock in high-risk trauma and surgical patients. Surg Clin North Am 1996;76(4):985-97.

13. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Bishop MH, Thangathurai D, Patil RS. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of critical patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:675-81.