Article Data

  • Views 1600
  • Dowloads 122

Original Research

Open Access

Safety of Blunt Spinal Injury Patient on Hospital Gurney

  • WEI-CHE LEE1
  • LIANG-CHI KUO1
  • YUAN-CHIA CHENG1
  • CHAO-WEN CHEN1
  • YEN-KO LIN1
  • TSUNG-YING LIN1
  • HSING-LIN LIN1

1,Department of Emergency Medicine Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung Medical University

DOI: 10.22514/SV81.052013.4 Vol.8,Issue 1,May 2013 pp.25-30

Published: 01 May 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): HSING-LIN LIN E-mail: hsinglin2002@yahoo.com.tw

Abstract

Objectives. Restraint of patients on a spine board has been used in the past to prevent further spinal cord injury after rescue of patients from the scene of an accident. Removal from the spine board is a routine protocol in many hospitals once the patient has been cleared of spinal injury. However, the benefit of using a spine board, in light-weight motorcycle-related accident victims, has never been studied before.

Materials and methods. A retrospective observational study enrolled patients who had sustained motorcycle-related acci-dents and were brought to our emergency department (ED). Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score lower than 15 and those who died at the ED, or had incomplete data, were excluded. The diagnosis of spinal injury was based upon clinical evaluation and was confirmed by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray reports, as interpreted by a qualified radiologist. A neurological examination was performed, according to the Standard Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, directly after arrival and again before leaving the ED. 

Results. During the study period, from January 2007 to December 2010, 91 patients with spinal injuries who met the inclusi-on criteria, consisting of 35 male and 56 female patients with a mean age of 45.44±18.12 years, were enrolled in our study. The scores of the motor and sensory neurological exams did not show any significant change during the ED stay after being placed in a gurney without a spine board (p=0.432). 

Conclusions. Removal of the spine board and placement on a hospital gurney sponge is safe in alert patients whose primary examination is completed at the ED.

Keywords

motorcycle accident, spi-nal injury, spine board, emergency department  

Cite and Share

WEI-CHE LEE, LIANG-CHI KUO,YUAN-CHIA CHENG,CHAO-WEN CHEN,YEN-KO LIN,TSUNG-YING LIN,HSING-LIN LIN. Safety of Blunt Spinal Injury Patient on Hospital Gurney. Signa Vitae. 2013. 8(1);25-30.

References

1. De Lorenzo RA. A review of spinal immobilization techniques. J Emerg Med 1996 Sep-Oct;14(5):603-13.

2. Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Ziv YB, Safir O, Blumenfeld A, Mirovsky Y. A biomechanical comparison between the thoracolumbosacral surface contact area (SCA) of a standard backboard with other rigid immobilization surfaces. J Trauma 2009 Jan;66(1):191-4.

3. Burton JH, Dunn MG, Harmon NR, Hermanson TA, Bradshaw JR. A statewide, prehospital emergency medical service selective patient spine immobilization protocol. J Trauma 2006 Jul;61(1):161-7.

4. Edlich RF, Mason SS, Vissers RJ, Gubler KD, Thacker JG, Pharr P, et al. Revolutionary advances in enhancing patient comfort on patients transported on a backboard. Am J Emerg Med 2011 Feb;29(2):181-6.

5. Chan D, Goldberg RM, Mason J, Chan L. Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated. J Emerg Med 1996 May-Jun;14(3):293-8.

6. Lerner EB, Moscati R. Duration of patient immobilization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2000 Jan;18(1):28-30.

7. Hauswald M, Braude D. Spinal immobilization in trauma patients: is it really necessary? Curr Opin Crit Care 2002 Dec;8(6):566-70.

8. Hauswald M, Ong G, Tandberg D, Omar Z. Out-of-hospital Spinal Immobilization: Its Effect on Neurologic Injury. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(3):214-9.

9. Hauswald M, McNally T. Confusing extrication with immobilization: the inappropriate use of hard spine boards for interhospital transfers. Air Med J 2000 Oct-Dec;19(4):126-7.

10. Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman SJ, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med 1995 Jul;26(1):31-6.

11. Kwan I, Bunn F. Effects of prehospital spinal immobilization: a systematic review of randomized trials on healthy subjects. Prehosp Disaster Med 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-53.

12. Horodyski M, Conrad BP, Del Rossi G, DiPaola CP, Rechtine GR 2nd. Removing a patient from the spine board: is the lift and slide safer than the log roll? J Trauma 2011 May;70(5):1282-5; discussion 5.

13. Del Rossi G, Horodyski M, Heffernan TP, Powers ME, Siders R, Brunt D, et al. Spine-board transfer techniques and the unstable cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004 Apr 1;29(7):E134-8.

14. Hemmes B, Poeze M, Brink PR. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spine-board. J Trauma 2010 Mar;68(3):593-8.

15. Keller BP, Lubbert PH, Keller E, Leenen LP. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients. Injury 2005 Aug;36(8):946-8.

16. Luscombe MD, Williams JL. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Emerg Med J 2003 Sep;20(5):476-8.

17. Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med 1996 Jul;14(4):369-72.

18. Hauswald M, Hsu M, Stockoff C. Maximizing comfort and minimizing ischemia: a comparison of four methods of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):250-2.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top