Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
The Role of Pain Scoring in Multi-detector Computed Tomography Indications in Pediatric Occult Fractures
1Aksaray University Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray, Turkey
*Corresponding Author(s): Ahmet Çağlar E-mail: drcaglar4@gmail.com
Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) is used in emergency orthopedic trauma cases with suspicion of fracture that cannot be detected on X-ray. Also pain during examination in patients with fracture is important for clinicians. We aimed to investigate whether pain severity is indicative of multi-detector CT (MDCT). Methods: A total of 175 patients included in the study. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pre-examination pain in all patients. The most painful and suitable region for palpation were determined, palpated and the patients were asked to re-score their pain. In this way, the local VAS score was determined. MDCT was performed in all patients with general VAS of > 5. MDCT results were compared with the VAS scores. Results: Fracture detection in MDCT was 61.1% in patients with general VAS score of ≥ 5. Of the 105 patients with the local VAS score of ≥ 7, 90 had fractures. In these patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MDCT for detecting fractures were 84.1%, 77.9%, 85.7% and 75.7%, respectively. Conclusion: We believe that MDCT should be performed for suspected fracture if pain severity is high in isolated extremity trauma cases without fracture detection on X-ray.
Multi-detector Computed tomography, Pediatric trauma, Pain, Visual analogue scale
Hüseyin Mutlu,Ahmet Çağlar,Ekrem Taha Sert. The Role of Pain Scoring in Multi-detector Computed Tomography Indications in Pediatric Occult Fractures. Signa Vitae. 2020. 16(1);153-158.
[1] Spady DW, Saunders DL, Schopflocher DP, Svenson LW. Patterns of injury in children: a population-basedapproach. Pediatrics. 2004;113:522-9.
[2] Mathison JD, Agrawal D. General principles of fracture management: Fracture patterns and description in children. www.uptodate.com/home/index.html. Accessed June 14, 2010.
[3] Reisdorf E, Schwartz T. Introduction to emergency radiology. In Schwartz T. Reisdorf E, Editor. Emergency Radiology. 1 st ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2000;p:1-10
[4] Freed HA, Shields NN. Most frequently overlooked radiographically apparent fractures in a teaching hospital emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:900-4.
[5] Jarraya M, Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Crema MD, Diaz L, Conlin J et al. Radiographically occult and subtle fractures: a pictorial review. Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:370169.
[6] Freyd M. The graphic rating scale. J Educ Psychol. 1923;14:83–102.
[7] Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VW, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:378–81.
[8] Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med.1996;4:485–9.
[9] McGrath PJ1, Walco GA, Turk DC et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:771-83.
[10] Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95–7.
[11] Buckwalter KA, Farber JM. Application of multidetector CT in skeletal trauma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8:147-56.
[12] Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics. 1999;19:1143-1160.
[13] Dalinka MK, Boorstein JM, Zlatkin MB. Computed tomography of musculoskeletal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1989;27: 933-944.
[14] Naranja RJ Jr, Gregg JR, Dormans JP, Drummond DS, Davidson RS, Hahn M. Pediatric fracture without radiographic abnormality. Description and significance. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;342: 141-6.
[15] Allen GM, Wilson DJ, Bullock SA, Watson M. Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20180989.
[16] Berger PE, Ofstein RA, Jackson DW, Morrison DS, Silvino N, Amador R. MRI demonstration of radiographically occult fractures: what have we been missing? Radiographics. 1989;9: 407-36.
[17] Mallee W, Doornberg JN, Ring D, van Dijk CN, Maas M, Goslings JC. Comparison of CT and MRI for diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;5;93:20-28
[18] Memarsadeghi M, Breitenseher MJ, Schaefer-Prokop C, Weber M, Aldrian S, Gäbler C et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2006;240:169-76.
[19] Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58:902-5.
[20] Wei CJ, Tsai WC, Tiu CM, Wu HT, Chiou HJ, Chang CY. Systematic analysis of missed extremity fractures in emergency radiology. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:710-7.
[21] Welling RD, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, Chong S, Caoili EM, Jebson PJ. MDCT and radiography of wrist fractures: radiographic sensitivity and fracture patterns. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:10-16.
[22] Imerci A, Canbek U, Kaya A, Sürer L, Savran A. Distribution of occult fractures detected in emergency orthopedic patient trauma with computerized tomography. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19:157-63
[23] Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488-96.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) (On Hold)
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index
Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024)
Embase
Top