Findings of Non-enhanced Abdominal Computed Tomography for Pain Management of Acute Renal Colic Patients in the Emergency Department

Study Objectives: To identify non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) findings related to repeated requirement of painkiller, hospitalization and revisits within 5 days of discharge among acute renal colic patients. Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed for all patients (age > 18 years) with acute renal colic who visited the emergency department (ED) between 2012 and 2015. NECT findings of acute ureterolithiasis (size, location, hydronephroureter, perinephric infiltrations and soft-tissue rim sign) were analysed for their relationships to repeated administration of painkiller, hospitalization and ED revisit. Results: Of total 862 patients enrolled, 305 (35.4%) required repeated administration of pain medication. In the NECT findings, hydronephroureter was more prevalent in the repeated administration of painkiller group (61.3% vs. 53.7%), but did not show independent relationship. Sixty-eight (7.9%) were hospitalized and 44 (5.1%) returned to the ED. The significant findings associated with hospitalization were hydronephroureter (OR [Odd Ratio] 1.92, 95%CI [Confidence Intervals] 1.04–3.54) and mid (5–7 mm) / large-size (> 7mm) ureteral stones (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.49–4.76 and OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.80–12.70). The soft-tissue rim signs (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.07–4.37) and proximal/mid location of stones (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.26–8.20 and OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.19–5.37) were independently associated with ED revisit. Conclusions: Among the NECT findings of acute ureterolithiasis, hydronephroureter and stones > 5 mm in size were independently associated with the need of hospitalization. The soft-tissue rim sign and proximal/mid location of stones were independently associated with ED revisit within 5 days.

Urolithiasis, Renal colic, Computed tomography, Radiology, Emergency departments

[1] Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, et al. (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817-1823.

[2] Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urologic Diseases in America P. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160-165.

[3] Fwu CW, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, et al. Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int. 2013;83:479-486.

[4] Graham A, Luber S, Wolfson AB. Urolithiasis in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011;29:519-538.

[5] Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, et al. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:280-286.

[6] Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S, et al. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2513-2520.

[7] Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS, et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000;217:792-797.

[8] Colistro R, Torreggiani WC, Lyburn ID, et al. Unenhanced helical CT in the investigation of acute flank pain. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:435-441.

[9] Ulahannan D, Blakeley CJ, Jeyadevan N, et al. Benefits of CT urography in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected ureteric colic. Emerg Med J. 2008;25:569-571.

[10] Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159: 735-740.

[11] Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228:319-329.

[12] Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:101-103.

[13] Al-Nakshabandi NA. The soft-tissue rim sign. Radiology. 2003;229:239-240.

[14] Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Ernst RD et al. Ureterolithiasis: can clinical outcome be predicted with unenhanced helical CT? Radiology. 1988;208:97-102.

[15] Ege G, Akman H, Kuzucu K, et al. Acute ureterolithiasis: incidence of secondary signs on unenhanced helical CT and influence on patient management. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:990-994.

[16] Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1610-1631.

[17] Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;66:1319-1322.

[18] Ganesan V, Loftus CJ, Hinck B, et al. Clinical Predictors of 30-Day Emergency Department Revisits for Patients with Ureteral Stones. J Urol. 2016;96:1467-1470.

[19] Guest AR, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Assessment of the clinical utility of the rim and comet-tail signs in differentiating ureteral stones from phleboliths. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1285-1291.

[20] Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Boridy IC, et al. Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:997-1000.

[21] Yoshida T, Inoue T, Taguchi M, et al. Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report. 2019;37:913-919.

[22] Vallerand AH, Polomano RC. The relationship of gender to pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2000;1:8-15.