Article Data

  • Views 3496
  • Dowloads 318

Original Research

Open Access

The analysis of emergency medicine professionals' occupational anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Canan Akman1
  • Murat Cetin2
  • Cetin Toraman3

1Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Medicine, Emergency Department, Çanakkale, Turkey

2İzmir Tınaztepe University, Vocational School, First Aid and Emergency Department, İzmir, Turkey

3Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education, Çanakkale, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.023 Vol.17,Issue 3,May 2021 pp.103-111

Submitted: 15 December 2020 Accepted: 15 January 2021

Published: 08 May 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Murat Cetin E-mail:


Objectives: People worldwide have experienced anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic including healthcare professionals. News about the number of deaths and cases shared on social media has also increased the anxiety. Anxiety is described as an emotional state in which a feeling of weakness is experienced during preparation for perceived risk; it also includes fear. In our study, the occupational anxiety levels of emergency medicine professionals were compared based on various variables (institution, years of experience, number of daily emergency patient cases in the institution, etc.).

Methods: The study was conducted with 168 emergency medical professionals from 5 different countries. The COVID-19 outbreak was ongoing while data was being collected, and the study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee provided that the data were collected online. Research data were obtained in June, July, and August 2020. One of the two sub-factors in the scale is physical, physical, and life anxiety factor. There are 12 items in this sub-factor: The lowest possible score is 12, and the highest score is 60. The other sub-factors are the work environment, employees, equipment, and environmental factors.

Results: Accessibility to personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a difference in bodily, physical, and vital anxiety levels (P < 0.05). Gender, chronic disease before COVID-19 status, marital status, years of experience, overtime work during the COVID-19 pandemic, and SARS-COV-2 contagion status during the treatment process did not cause any difference in bodily, physical, and vital anxiety levels (P > 0.05). The place of work caused a significant difference in the level of bodily, physical, and vital anxiety (P < 0.05). Years of experience in the profession caused a significant difference in the level of anxiety regarding work atmosphere, employee, PPE, and environmental factors (P < 0.05). During the COVID-19 pandemic, overtime work during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant difference in the level of anxiety related to work atmosphere, employee, equipment, and environmental factors (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergency service working hours caused a significant difference in the anxiety levels related to work atmosphere, employees, equipment, and environmental factors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, access to personal protective equipment caused a difference in anxiety levels. As a result, the anxiety level of the emergency medicine professionals who are in the front line in the hospitals should be treated, and they should be provided psychological and behavioural support.


Emergency medicine; Occupational anxiety; COVID-19

Cite and Share

Canan Akman,Murat Cetin,Cetin Toraman. The analysis of emergency medicine professionals' occupational anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Signa Vitae. 2021. 17(3);103-111.


[1] Sakaoğlu HH, Orbatu D, Emiroglu M, Çakır Ö. COVID-19 Salgını Sırasında Sağlık Çalışanlarında Spielberger Durumluk ve Sürekli Kaygı Düzeyi:Tepecik Hastanesi Örneği. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. 2020; 30: 1-9. (In Turkish)

[2] Stuijfzand S, Deforges C, Sandoz V, Sajin C, Jaques C, Elmers J, et al. Psychological impact of an epidemic/pandemic on the mental health of healthcare professionals: a rapid review. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 1230.

[3] Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 Scale: development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020; 1-9.

[4] Maunder RG. Was SARS a mental health catastrophe? General Hospital Psychiatry. 2009; 31: 316-317.

[5] Türk Toraks Derneği Mesleksel Akciğer Hastalıkları Çalışma Grubu (2020). Sağlık çalışanlarında covıd-19 salgını sırasında mesleki riskler hakkında bilgilendirme ve öneriler. 2020. Avaliable at: httpss.// (Accessed: 24 July 2020).

[6] Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19. Avaliable at: (Accessed: 27 May 2020).

[7] Aktan E. Sosyal Medya ve Sosyal Kaygı: Sosyal Medya Kullanıcıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi. 2018; 11: 35-53. (In Turkish)

[8] Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, Huang F, Wang F, Yuan J, et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Science China Life Sciences. 2020; 63: 364-374.

[9] Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3: e203976.

[10] Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general us population. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2013; 172: 1377-1385.

[11] Amin F, Sharif S, Saeed R, Durrani N, Jilani D. COVID-19 pandemic-knowledge, perception, anxiety and depression among frontline doctors of Pakistan. BMC Psychiatry. 2020; 20: 459.

[12] Mull CC, Bowman WR. A call to restore your calling: self-care of the emergency physician in the face of life-changing stress: part 5 of 6: physician burnout. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2020; 36: e25-e29.

[13] Larry B, Johnson BR,Turner LA. Research Methods, Design, and Analysis. 2014.

[14] Postacı ES, Uysal İ,Koşan AMA, Toraman Ç. Acil Sağlık Çalışanları İçin Mesleki Kaygı Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2020; 19: 102- 115. (In Turkish)

[15] Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Nisan kitabevi. 2013. (In Turkish)

[16] Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. 2013. (In Turkish)

[17] Green SB, Salkind NJ. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh. Analyzing and understanding the data. USA: Pearson Prentice Hal. 2008.

[18] Kalaycı Ş. SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım. 2005. (In Turkish)

[19] Clavier T, Ramen J, Dureuil B, Veber B, Hanouz JL, Dupont H, et al. Use of the smartphone app WhatsApp as an e-learning method for medical residents: multicenter controlled randomized trial. JMIR mhealth uhealth. 2019; 7: e12825.

[20] Demailly Z, Brulard G, Selim J, Compère V, Besnier E, Clavier T. Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 124: e178-e184.

[21] Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016; 18: e166.

[22] Rodriguez RM, Medak AJ, Baumann BM, Lim S, Chinnock B, Frazier R, et al. Academic emergency medicine physicians’ anxiety levels, stressors, and potential stress mitigation measures during the acceleration phase of the COVID-9 pandemic. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2020; 27: 700-707.

[23] Çetintepe SP, Ilhan MN. COVID-19 Salgınında Saglık Çalısanlarında Risk Azaltılması. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Re-search. 2020; 1: 50-54. (In Turkish)

[24] Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2020; 27: taaa021.

[25] Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020; 323: 1239.

[26] Maynard SL, Kao R, Craig DG. Impact of personal protective equipment on clinical output and perceived exertion. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 2016; 162: 180-183.

[27] Martín Rodríguez F, Fernández Pérez C, Castro Villamor M, Martín Conty JL, Arnillas Gómez P, Casado Vicente V. Does level D personal protective equipment guard against hazardous biologic agents during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Emergencias. 2018; 30: 119-122.

[28] Song W, Li H, Ding N, Zhao W, Shi L, Wen D. Psychometrics properties of the Team Interaction Scale and influencing factors of team interaction of tertiary hospital physicians in China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e026162.

[29] Zhu J, Sun L, Zhang L, Wang H, Fan A, Yang B, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of anxiety and depression symptoms in the first-line medical staff fighting against COVID-19 in Gansu. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020; 11: 386.

[30] Wang Z, Xie Z, Dai J, Zhang L, Huang Y, Chen B. Physician burnout and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai. Journal of Occupational Health. 2014; 56: 73-83.

[31] Cui G, Wang F, Xu Y. Job burnout among physicians in ten areas of China. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013; 93: 3773-3775. (In Chinese)

[32] Tatebe LC, Rajaram Siva N, Pekarek S, Liesen E, Wheeler A, Reese C, et al. Heroes in crisis: trauma centers should be screening for and intervening on posttraumatic stress in our emergency responders. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2020; 89: 132-139.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time