Article Data

  • Views 3443
  • Dowloads 175


Open Access

Digital technology to control COVID-19 in China: issues, challenges and implications for the healthcare system

  • Jianliang Xiao1
  • Ruilian Zhang2,*,

1School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 211100 Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

2Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, 4072 Brisbane, Australia

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.229 Vol.18,Issue 6,November 2022 pp.103-109

Submitted: 25 August 2021 Accepted: 12 October 2021

Published: 08 November 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Ruilian Zhang E-mail:


In the current era, public health crises are presenting new systematic and cross-border characteristics and uncertainty. Public health crises are challenges for governments and health systems. The development of digital technology has changed the world and connected it as a “village”, and digital technology has played a critical role in providing support during public health crises over the past three decades. From the perspective of empowerment theory, we explore the role of digital technology in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic and digital technology approaches to controlling COVID-19 in China. Accordingly, we identify the challenges of using digital technology to control public health crises, including the imbalance of the rights and responsibilities of governance subjects, the incompatibility of the governance model and digital technology and the inadequate application of digital technology. Considering implications for the successful prevention and control of COVID-19, we suggest that the government should improve the balance of rights and responsibilities for coordinated crisis governance, link digital technology and the governance system and broaden the grassroots governance community.


Public health crisis; Digital technology; Healthcare system; Challenges; COVID-19

Cite and Share

Jianliang Xiao,Ruilian Zhang. Digital technology to control COVID-19 in China: issues, challenges and implications for the healthcare system. Signa Vitae. 2022. 18(6);103-109.


[1] Xing C, Zhang R. COVID-19 in China: Responses, Challenges and Implications for the Health System. Healthcare. 2021; 9: 82.

[2] Zhang J, Zhang R. COVID-19 in China: Power, Transparency and Governance in Public Health Crisis. Healthcare. 2020; 8: 288.

[3] Yuan B, Jian W, He L, Wang B, Balabanova D. The role of health system governance in strengthening the rural health insurance system in China. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2017; 16: 44.

[4] Qiao Y, Sun Z. On active government-a comparative study of government models under market economy conditions. Journal of Jiangnan Social University. 2001; 02: 33–37.

[5] Ling J, Hou C. From “active government” to “self-control government”: the portrait of government in modern university governance in the new era. Fudan Education Forum. 2020; 18: 32–38.

[6] Burki T. China’s successful control of COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020; 20: 1240–1241.

[7] Guo X, Liu B. Winning Fast: The National Governance System in Crisis Management——Taking the response to the COVID-19 pandemic as an example. Zhongzhou Academic Journal. 2020; 04: 10–19. (In Chinese)

[8] Cecchetto C, Aiello M, Gentili C, Ionta S, Osimo SA. Increased emotional eating during COVID-19 associated with lockdown, psychological and social distress. Appetite. 2021; 160: 105122.

[9] Osimo SA, Aiello M, Gentili C, Ionta S, Cecchetto C. The Influence of Personality, Resilience, and Alexithymia on Mental Health During COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 630751.

[10] Pan X. Application of personal-oriented digital technology in preventing transmission of COVID-19, China. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 2020; 189: 1145–1146.

[11] Kapoor A, Guha S, Kanti Das M, Goswami KC, Yadav R. Digital healthcare: the only solution for better healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic? Indian Heart Journal. 2020; 72: 61–64.

[12] Ye Z, Wang L, Tian H. Digital government and data governance from the perspective of government responsibility system construction. Chinese Administration. 2018; 7: 57–62.

[13] Murray CJL, Alamro NMS, Hwang H, Lee U. Digital public health and COVID-19. The Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5: e469–e470.

[14] Cheng YD, Yu J, Shen Y, Huang B. Coproducing Responses to COVID ‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China. Public Administration Review. 2020; 80: 866–873.

[15] Chebat J, Kollias P. The Impact of Empowerment on Customer Contact Employees’ Roles in Service Organizations. Journal of Service Research. 2000; 3: 66–81.

[16] Sun J. Precise efforts and proactive actions to give full play to the key role of big data applications in pandemic prevention and control [EB/OL]. 2020. Available at: cn/content/detail/id/l1xtkp51 (Accessed: 2 November 2021).

[17] Beaunoyer E, Dupéré S, Guitton MJ. COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020; 111: 106424.

[18] Kwok AH, Becker J, Paton D, Hudson-Doyle E, Johnston D. Stake-holders’ Perspectives of Social Capital in Informing the Development of Neighborhood-Based Disaster Resilience Measurements. Journal of Applied Social Science. 2019; 13: 26–57.

[19] Hassounah M, Raheel H, Alhefzi M. Digital Response During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22: e19338.

[20] He W, Zhang Z, Li W. Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management. 2021; 57: 102287.

[21] Intawong K, Olson D, Chariyalertsak S. Application technology to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned in Thailand. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2021; 534: 830–836.

[22] Sun Z, Cheng X, Zhang R, Yang B. Factors Influencing Rumour Re-Spreading in a Public Health Crisis by the Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 6542.

[23] Sun Z, Yang B, Zhang R, Cheng X. Influencing Factors of Understanding COVID-19 Risks and Coping Behaviors among the Elderly Population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 5889.

[24] Papouli E, Chatzifotiou S, Tsairidis C. The use of digital technology at home during the COVID-19 outbreak:Views of social work students in Greece. Social Work Education. 2020; 39: 1107–1115.

[25] Shah SGS, Nogueras D, van Woerden HC, Kiparoglou V. The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pandemic of Lockdown Loneliness and the Role of Digital Technology. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22: e22287.

[26] Ting DSW, Carin L, Dzau V, Wong TY. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020; 26: 459–461.

[27] Vargo D, Zhu L, Benwell B, Yan Z. Digital technology use during COVID ‐19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2021; 3: 13–24.

[28] Wang J, Zhang R. COVID-19 in Rural China: Features, Challenges and Implications for the Healthcare System. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021; 14: 1045–1051.

[29] Whitelaw S, Mamas MA, Topol E, Van Spall HGC. Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. The Lancet Digital Health. 2020; 2: e435–e440.

[30] Hopman J, Allegranzi B, Mehtar S. Managing COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2020; 323: 1549.

[31] Ahmad AR, Murad HR. The Impact of Social Media on Panic during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22: e19556.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time