Article Data

  • Views 338
  • Dowloads 164

Original Research

Open Access

High-dose methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone therapy for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective analysis

  • Yasumasa Kawano1,2,*,
  • Yusuke Osaki3
  • Hiroshi Yatsugi3
  • Tatsuya Hashimoto4
  • Naoko Inoshima5
  • Shuji Hayashi1,5

1Department of Emergency, Hakujyuji Hospital, 8198511 Fukuoka, Japan

2Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, 8140180 Fukuoka, Japan

3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hakujyuji Hospital, 8198511 Fukuoka, Japan

4Department of Surgery, Hakujyuji Hospital, 8198511 Fukuoka, Japan

5Department of Neurosurgery, Hakujyuji Hospital, 8198511 Fukuoka, Japan

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2022.065

Submitted: 10 May 2022 Accepted: 16 June 2022

Online publish date: 01 September 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Yasumasa Kawano E-mail: kawano19830301@gmail.com

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) who required oxygen therapy, but not noninvasive/invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. This retrospective observational study that was conducted from April 2021 to October 2021 at a secondary hospital in Japan enrolled patients who were administered 6 mg/day dexamethasone as an initial corticosteroid treatment on admission (dexamethasone group) and those who were administered ≥ 250 mg/day methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone group). Of the 42 participants, 40.5%(17/42) were included in the methylprednisolone group. The incidence of transfer to a tertiary hospital did not differ significantly between the methylprednisolone and dexamethasone groups (5.9% vs. 20%, p = 0.37), and in-hospital mortality was similar in both the groups (0% vs. 4%, p = 1.00). Participants in the methylprednisolone group had a significantly longer duration of oxygen therapy than the dexamethasone group (median (interquartile range) 8.5 (5.5–11.2) days vs. 4 (2.0–7.5) days, p < 0.05). Compared to dexamethasone, high-dose methylprednisolone therapy did not provide any added benefits for patients with severe COVID-19 who did not require respiratory mechanical support.


Keywords

COVID-19; Severe illness; Pulse; Methylprednisolone; Dexamethasone


Cite and Share

Yasumasa Kawano,Yusuke Osaki,Hiroshi Yatsugi,Tatsuya Hashimoto,Naoko Inoshima,Shuji Hayashi. High-dose methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone therapy for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective analysis. Signa Vitae. 2022.doi:10.22514/sv.2022.065.

References

[1] Chilamakuri R, Agarwal S. COVID-19: characteristics and therapeutics. Cells. 2021; 10: 206.

[2] Meyerowitz EA, Richterman A, Bogoch II, Low N, Cevik M. Towards an accurate and systematic characterisation of persistently asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21: e163–e169.

[3] Jin X, Lian J, Hu J, Gao J, Zheng L, Zhang Y, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020; 69: 1002–1009.

[4] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506.

[5] Kenny G, Mallon PW. COVID19- clinical presentation and therapeutic considerations. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2021; 538: 125–131.

[6] Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020; 180: 934.

[7] Bao J, Li C, Zhang K, Kang H, Chen W, Gu B. Comparative analysis of laboratory indexes of severe and non-severe patients infected with COVID-19. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2020; 509: 180–194.

[8] Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Keh D, Kupfer Y, et al. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019; 12: Cd002243.

[9] Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 384: 693–704.

[10] Edalatifard M, Akhtari M, Salehi M, Naderi Z, Jamshidi A, Mostafaei S, et al. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse as a treatment for hospitalised severe COVID-19 patients: results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. European Respiratory Journal. 2020; 56: 2002808.

[11] Agarwal A, Rochwerg B, Lamontagene F, Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Askie L, et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3379.

[12] Kory P, Kanne JP. SARS-CoV-2 organising pneumonia: ‘has there been a widespread failure to identify and treat this prevalent condition in COVID-19?’. BMJ Open Respiratory Research. 2020; 7: e000724.

[13] Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2013; 48: 452–458.

[14] Matthay MA, Wick KD. Corticosteroids, COVID-19 pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020; 130: 6218–6221.

[15] Ikeda S, Misumi T, Izumi S, Sakamoto K, Nishimura N, Ro S, et al. Corticosteroids for hospitalized patients with mild to critically-ill COVID-19: a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched study. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 10727.

[16] Liu J, Zhang S, Dong X, Li Z, Xu Q, Feng H, et al. Corticosteroid treatment in severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020; 130: 6417–6428.

[17] Wong CKH, Lau KTK, Au ICH, Xiong X, Chung MSH, Lau EHY, et al. Optimal timing of remdesivir initiation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients administered with dexamethasone. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; ciab728.

[18] Li S, Hu Z, Song X. High-dose but not low-dose corticosteroids potentially delay viral shedding of patients with COVID-19. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 72: 1297–1298.

[19] Chen Y, Li L. Influence of corticosteroid dose on viral shedding duration in patients with COVID-19. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 72: 1298–1300.

[20] Buso R, Cinetto F, Dell’Edera A, Veneran N, Facchini C, Biscaro C. et al. Comparison between dexamethasone and methylprednisolone therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to non-intensive medical units. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10: 5812.

[21] Shuto H, Komiya K, Yamasue M, Uchida S, Ogura T, Mukae H, et al. A systematic review of corticosteroid treatment for noncritically ill patients with COVID-19. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 20935.

[22] Zhan Y, Shang J, Gu Y, Huang Q, Xie J. Efficacy of corticosteroid in patients with COVID-19: a multi-center retrospective study and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Virology. 2021; 93: 4292–4302.

[23] Ayyar VS, Song D, DuBois DC, Almon RR, Jusko WJ. Modeling corti-costeroid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, part I: determination and prediction of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone tissue binding in the rat. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2019; 370: 318–326.

[24] Ranjbar K, Moghadami M, Mirahmadizadeh A, Fallahi MJ, Khaloo V, Shahriarirad R, et al. Methylprednisolone or dexamethasone, which one is superior corticosteroid in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21: 337.

[25] Ko JJ, Wu C, Mehta N, Wald-Dickler N, Yang W, Qiao R. A comparison of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in intensive care patients with COVID-19. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2021; 36: 673–680.

[26] Pinzón MA, Ortiz S, Holguín H, Betancur JF, Arango DC, Laniado H, et al. Dexamethasone vs. methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia. PLoS One. 2021; 16: e0252057.

[27] Waleed K, Azizullah B, Saffa I, Saif-Eddin M, Omar S, Mohammed M, et al. Pulse versus nonpulse steroid regimens in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Virology. 2022; 1–13.

[28] Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB, Mrklas KJ, Roberts DJ, Stelfox HT. Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015; 163: 768–777.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2021) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top