Article Data

  • Views 1386
  • Dowloads 146

Original Research

Open Access

Contrast extravasation and hematoma volume as predictors of the need for embolization in patients with pelvic fractures

  • Min A Lee1
  • Byungchul Yu1,*,
  • Jayun Cho1
  • Myung Jin Jang1
  • Gil Jae Lee1
  • Kang Kook Choi1
  • Yang Bin Jeon1
  • Seung Hwan Lee1
  • Youngeun Park1

1Department of Trauma Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, 405-760 Incheon, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2023.021 Vol.19,Issue 5,September 2023 pp.144-152

Submitted: 23 September 2022 Accepted: 12 December 2022

Published: 08 September 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Byungchul Yu E-mail: kane2123@gilhospital.com

Abstract

Angioembolization is effective and safe in patients with pelvic bone fractures with arterial bleeding. However, there is still no consensus regarding the indications for angiography after pelvic fractures. This study investigated predictors of embolization in patients with pelvic bone fractures through a comparative analysis of patients who had extravasation on angiography. From January 2009 to December 2021, 1431 patients with pelvic fractures were admitted to a single trauma center. After the application of exclusion criteria, 949 patients were enrolled in the study. We divided the patients into two groups to identify predictors of patients with arterial bleeding: the therapeutic embolization (TE) group (n = 149) versus the non-TE group (n = 800). Vital signs and laboratory data were significantly worse in the TE group, except for the Glasgow Coma Scale. When the fracture patterns were compared, the vertical shearing type and the anteroposterior compression type were significantly more common in the TE group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified five predictors of therapeutic embolization: systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg in the emergency department (odds ratio (OR) = 2.63; 95% credible intervals (CI) = 1.52–4.53; p = 0.001), combined injury to the abdomen (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3) (OR = 3.94; 95% CI = 2.23–6.97; p < 0.001), contrast extravasation on enhanced computed tomography (OR = 30.41; 95% CI = 16.08–57.52; p < 0.001), sacroiliac joint disruption (OR = 2.40; 95% CI = 1.35–4.28; p = 0.003), and hematoma volume >25 mL (OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 2.06–6.98; p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, contrast extravasation on enhanced computed tomography, sacroiliac joint disruption, and pelvic hematoma were significant predictors of embolization in pelvic fracture patients. Trauma surgeons’ clinical decision-making for patients with pelvic bone fractures should consider clinical features and radiologic findings.


Keywords

Pelvic bone fracture; Angioembolization; Predictor; Hematoma


Cite and Share

Min A Lee,Byungchul Yu,Jayun Cho,Myung Jin Jang,Gil Jae Lee,Kang Kook Choi,Yang Bin Jeon,Seung Hwan Lee,Youngeun Park. Contrast extravasation and hematoma volume as predictors of the need for embolization in patients with pelvic fractures. Signa Vitae. 2023. 19(5);144-152.

References

[1] Stein DM, O’Toole R, Scalea TM. Multidisciplinary approach for patients with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2007; 96: 272–280.

[2] White CE, Hsu JR, Holcomb JB. Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2009; 40: 1023–1030.

[3] Yang S, Park H, Kim S, Yoon S, Park S. Essential factors in predicting the need for angio-embolization in the acute treatment of pelvic fracture with hemorrhage. Journal of Trauma and Injury. 2019; 32: 101–106.

[4] Hymel A, Asturias S, Zhao F, Bliss R, Moran T, Marshall RH, et al. Selective versus nonselective embolization versus no embolization in pelvic trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 83: 361–367.

[5] Tesoriero RB, Bruns BR, Narayan M, Dubose J, Guliani SS, Brenner ML, et al. Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82: 18–26.

[6] Flint L, Cryer HG. Pelvic fracture: the last 50 years. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. 2010; 69: 483–488.

[7] El-Haj M, Bloom A, Mosheiff R, Liebergall M, Weil YA. Outcome of angiographic embolisation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: factors predicting success. Injury. 2013; 44: 1750–1755.

[8] Brun J, Guillot S, Bouzat P, Broux C, Thony F, Genty C, et al. Detecting active pelvic arterial haemorrhage on admission following serious pelvic fracture in multiple trauma patients. Injury. 2014; 45: 101–106.

[9] Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, Bilaniuk JW, Collier BR, Como J, et al. Eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture—update and systematic review. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. 2011; 71: 1850–1868.

[10] Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Vassiliu P, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Hanks SH, et al. A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of angiographic embolization for pelvic and visceral injuries. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2002; 53: 303–308.

[11] Anandakumar V, Hussein FK, Varuun B, Zhu R. Predictive parameters for angiography and embolization in the bleeding pelvic fracture. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2013; 4: 70–74.

[12] Scalea TM. Re: preperitoneal pelvic packing reduces mortality in patients with life-threatening hemorrhage due to unstable pelvic fractures. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82: 649.

[13] Blackmore CC, Cummings P, Jurkovich GJ, Linnau KF, Hoffer EK, Rivara FP. Predicting major hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2006; 61: 346–352.

[14] Velmahos GC, Chahwan S, Falabella A, Hanks SE, Demetriades D. Angiographic embolization for intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal injuries. World Journal of Surgery. 2000; 24: 539–545.

[15] Pereira SJ, O’Brien DP, Luchette FA, Choe KA, Lim E, Davis, et al. Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. Surgery. 2000; 128: 678–685.

[16] Blackmore CC. Assessment of volume of hemorrhage and outcome from pelvic fracture. Archives of Surgery. 2003; 138: 504.

[17] Brown CVR, Kasotakis G, Wilcox A, Rhee P, Salim A, Demetriades D. Does pelvic hematoma on admission computed tomography predict active bleeding at angiography for pelvic fracture? The American Surgeon. 2005; 71: 759–762.

[18] Spahn DR, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Gordini G, et al. Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline. Critical Care. 2007; 11: R17.

[19] Miller PR, Moore PS, Mansell E, Meredith JW, Chang MC. External fixation or arteriogram in bleeding pelvic fracture: initial therapy guided by markers of arterial hemorrhage. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 2003; 54: 437–443.

[20] Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, O’Keefe GE, Scalea TM. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2002; 53: 446–451.

[21] Bramos A. Predictors of bleeding from stable pelvic fractures. Archives of Surgery. 2011; 146: 407.

[22] Young JW, Burgess AR, Brumback RJ, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology. 1986; 160: 445–451.

[23] Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, Podbielski JM, Catalano RD, Blackburn A, et al. Pelvic fracture pattern predicts the need for hemorrhage control intervention—results of an AAST multi-institutional study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82: 1030–1038.

[24] Cryer HM, Miller FB, Evers BM, Rouben LR, Seligson DL. Pelvic fracture classification: correlation with hemorrhage. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1988; 28: 973–980.

[25] Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Young JW, Brumback RJ, Poka A, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1989; 29: 981–1002.

[26] Salim A, Teixeira PGR, DuBose J, Ottochian M, Inaba K, Margulies DR, et al. Predictors of positive angiography in pelvic fractures: a prospective study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008; 207: 656–662.

[27] Fu C, Hsieh C, Wu S, Chen R, Wang Y, Shih C, et al. Anterior-posterior compression pelvic fracture increases the probability of requirement of bilateral embolization. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2013; 31: 42–49.

[28] Smith K, Ben-Menachem Y, Duke Jr JH, Hill GL. The superior gluteal: an artery at risk in blunt pelvic trauma. The Journal of Trauma. 1976; 16: 273–279.

[29] Kam J, Jackson H, Ben-Menachem Y. Vascular injuries in blunt pelvic trauma. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 1981; 19: 171–186.

[30] Arvieux C, Thony F, Broux C, Ageron FX, Rancurel E, Abba J, et al. Current management of severe pelvic and perineal trauma. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2012; 149: e227–e238.

[31] Ferrah N, Cameron P, Gabbe B, Fitzgerald M, Martin K, Beck B. Trends in the nature and management of serious abdominal trauma. World Journal of Surgery. 2019; 43: 1216–1225.

[32] Küper MA, Bachmann R, Wenig GF, Ziegler P, Trulson A, Trulson IM, et al. Associated abdominal injuries do not influence quality of care in pelvic fractures—a multicenter cohort study from the German pelvic registry. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2020; 15: 8.

[33] Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, Podbielski JM, Catalano R, Blackburn A, et al; AAST Pelvic Fracture Study Group. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: results of an American association for the surgery of trauma multi-institutional trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016; 80: 717–723.

[34] Diamond IR, Hamilton PA, Garber AB, Tien HC, Chughtai T, Rizoli SB, et al. Extravasation of intravenous computed tomography scan contrast in blunt abdominal and pelvic trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2009; 66: 1102–1107.

[35] Bozeman MC, Cannon RM, Trombold JM, Smith JW, Franklin GA, Miller FB, et al. Use of computed tomography findings and contrast extravasation in predicting the need for embolization with pelvic fractures. The American Surgeon. 2012; 78: 825–830.

[36] Brasel KJ, Pham K, Yang H, Christensen R, Weigelt JA. Significance of contrast extravasation in patients with pelvic fracture. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2007; 62: 1149–1152.

[37] Verbeek DOF, Zijlstra IAJ, van der Leij C, Ponsen KJ, van Delden OM, Goslings JC. Management of pelvic ring fracture patients with a pelvic “blush” on early computed tomography. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014; 76: 374–379.

[38] Cerva DS, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Kelly IM, Pais SO. Detection of bleeding in patients with major pelvic fractures: value of contrast-enhanced CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996; 166: 131–135.

[39] Lee H, No H, Choi N, Sun H, Lee J, Jung Y, et al. The size of pelvic hematoma can be a predictive factor for angioembolization in hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research. 2020; 98: 146.

[40] Dreizin D, Bodanapally UK, Neerchal N, Tirada N, Patlas M, Herskovits E. Volumetric analysis of pelvic hematomas after blunt trauma using semi-automated seeded region growing segmentation: a method valida-tion study. Abdominal Radiology. 2016; 41: 2203–2208.

[41] Yoshikawa S, Shiraishi A, Kishino M, Honda M, Urushibata N, Sekiya K, et al. Predictive ability and interobserver reliability of computed tomography findings for angioembolization in patients with pelvic fracture. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2018; 84: 319–324.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top