Article Data

  • Views 1447
  • Dowloads 141

Original Research

Open Access

Application effect of nursing model based on Rockall scoring system in emergency endoscopic treatment for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding

  • Jia Liu1
  • Shufang Wang2,*,
  • Zhongqin Han3

1Digestive endoscopy Center, Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222000 Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China;Department of Digestive Internal Medicine, Liayunngang Second People’s Hospital, 222000 Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China;Department of Digestive Internal Medicine, Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222000 Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2023.060 Vol.19,Issue 4,July 2023 pp.167-173

Submitted: 25 November 2022 Accepted: 13 February 2023

Published: 08 July 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Shufang Wang E-mail: sfwang222@163.com

Abstract

The study aims to explore the application effect of nursing model based on Rockall scoring system in the emergency endoscopic treatment for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. 128 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department of our hospital were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into the control group (64 cases) treated with routine bleeding management and the observation group (64 cases) treated with the nursing model based on Rockall scoring system by utilizing random number table. The hemostatic time, hospital stay, hemostasis, blood transfusion rate, rebleeding rate, mortality rate and Rockall score, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and nursing satisfaction were compared between the observation and control groups. The results turn out that the hemostatic time, hospital stay, hemostasis, blood transfusion rate, rebleeding rate, mortality rate and Rockall score were notably better than those in the control group. SDS and SAS scores in the observation group were prominently higher than that of the control group, and the satisfaction rate of nursing services of the observation group was higher than that of the control group. The nursing model based on Rockall scoring system could shorten the emergent hemostasis time and hospital stay, elevate recovery effect, and reduce the times of blood transfusion, the rebleeding rate and mortality of patients. Besides, it could lower the risk level of bleeding, improve the mental health status and satisfaction of patients with a great clinical practical value, which is worthy of clinical application.


Keywords

Rockall scoring system; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Endoscope; Emergency nursing


Cite and Share

Jia Liu,Shufang Wang,Zhongqin Han. Application effect of nursing model based on Rockall scoring system in emergency endoscopic treatment for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Signa Vitae. 2023. 19(4);167-173.

References

Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, Laine L, Sung J, Tse F, et al. Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: guideline recommendations from the international consensus group. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019; 171: 805–822.

[2] Karstensen JG, Ebigbo A, Bhat P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Gralnek I, Guy C, et al. Endoscopic treatment of variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) cascade guideline. Endoscopy International Open. 2020; 8: E990–E997.

[3] Qian O, Zhang Q, Pan Y, Cheng C, Xu L, Guan J, et al. Endoscopic ther-mocoagulation hemostasis for acute non-varicose upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a randomized controlled study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2022; 36: 1578–1583.

[4] Jung K, Moon W. Role of endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding in real clinical practice: an evidence-based review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019; 11: 68–83.

[5] Naseer M, Lambert K, Hamed A, Ali E. Endoscopic advances in the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2020; 12: 1–16.

[6] Sung JJY, Laine L, Kuipers EJ, Barkun AN. Towards personalised management for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 2021; 70: 818–824.

[7] Dewan KR, Patowary BS, Bhattarai S, Shrestha G. Complete Rockall score in predicting outcomes in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal. 2018; 14: 178–183.

[8] Custovic N, Husic-Selimovic A, Srsen N, Prohic D. Comparison of glasgow-blatchford score and Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Medical Archives. 2020; 74: 270–274.

[9] Oakland K. Risk stratification in upper and upper and lower GI bleeding: which scores should we use? Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019; 42–43: 101613.

[10] Tham J, Stanley A. Clinical utility of pre-endoscopy risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2019; 13: 1161–1167.

[11] Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine; National Medical Journal of China; Chinese Journal of Digestion; Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy; Chinese Digestive Endoscopist Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2018, Hangzhou). Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine. 2019; 58: 173–180. (In Chinese)

[12] Sverdén E, Markar SR, Agreus L, Lagergren J. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ. 2018; 363: k4023.

[13] Lau JYW, Yu Y, Tang RSY, Chan HCH, Yip H, Chan SM, et al. Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382: 1299–1308.

[14] Cai JX, Saltzman JR. Initial assessment, risk stratification, and early management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2018; 28: 261–275.

[15] Siau K, Hearnshaw S, Stanley AJ, Estcourt L, Rasheed A, Walden A, et al. British society of gastroenterology (BSG)-led multisociety consensus care bundle for the early clinical management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Frontline Gastroenterology. 2020; 11: 311–323.

[16] Kamboj AK, Hoversten P, Leggett CL. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: etiologies and management. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019; 94: 697–703.

[17] Lazăr DC, Ursoniu S, Goldiş A. Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2019; 7: 2687–2703.

[18] Shenoy V, Shah S, Kumar S, David D, Gunasekaran K, Priya G, et al. A prospective cohort study of patients presenting to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021; 10: 1431–1436.

[19] Mirzaali M, Carrasco AC, Mundre P, Sood R. Recent advances in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2020; 18: 16–23.

[20] Ai H. A randomised controlled trial: effect of the meticulous nursing model on the treatment compliance and quality of life of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2021; 10: 8737–8745.

[21] Oakland K, Kahan BC, Guizzetti L, Martel M, Bryant RV, Brahmania M, et al. Development, validation, and comparative assessment of an international scoring system to determine risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019; 17: 1121–1129.e2.

[22] Veisman I, Oppenheim A, Maman R, Kofman N, Edri I, Dar L, et al. A novel prediction tool for endoscopic intervention in patients with acute upper gastro-intestinal bleeding. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 5893.

[23] Chen L, Zheng H, Wang S. Prediction model of emergency mortality risk in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2021; 9: e11656.

[24] Liu F, Liu X, Yin C, Wang H. Nursing value analysis and risk assessment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding using multiagent reinforcement learning algorithm. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2022; 2022: 1–12.

[25] Chen J, Liu R, Wu X, Zhu Z, He R, Yang F, et al. Application of nursing risk management in nursing of severe peptic ulcer bleeding. Yangtze Medicine. 2021; 05: 226–234.

[26] Chapman W, Siau K, Thomas F, Ernest S, Begum S, Iqbal T, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a guide for nurses. British Journal of Nursing. 2019; 28: 53–59.

[27] Rodrigues A, Carrilho A, Almeida N, Baldaia C, Alves Â, Gomes M, et al. Interventional algorithm in gastrointestinal bleeding—an expert con-sensus multimodal approach based on a multidisciplinary team. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2020; 26: 1076029620931943.

[28] Shen Q, Zheng Y, He T, Mao T. The effect of clinical hierarchical nursing intervention on patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Signa Vitae. 2021; 17: 144–150.

[29] Yoon JY, Cha JM, Kwak MS, Jeon JW, Shin HP, Joo KR, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire is a valid tool to measure patient satisfaction in Asian country. Medicine. 2018; 97: e11477.

[30] Lau LHS, Sung JJY. Treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 2020: new techniques and outcomes. Digestive Endoscopy. 2021; 33: 83–94.



Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top