Comparison of direct and video laryngoscopes in charcoal ingestion setting: a randomized cross-over simulation study

Choosing the right intubation method to increase the success rate and performing it quickly is very important in a difficult airway situation. We aimed to compare the endotracheal intubation success rates and completion time when using direct laryngoscopes (DL) and GlideScope video laryngoscopes (GVL) in an activated charcoal ingestion manikin simulation. This study was designed as a randomized cross over study in an activated charcoal ingestion simulated model. Physicians who had >30 successful endotracheal intubation (ETI) experiences participated in this study. The end points were successful ETI and the duration of ETI completion. In order to compare the degree of intubation difficulty, the participants rated the visual analog scale (VAS). A total of 38 people participated in this study. The success rate of the first attempt was 28/38 (73.7%) for DL and 37/38 (97.4%) for GVL (p < 0.01). The estimated duration to successful ETI were 45.5 s (26–69) for DL and 28 s (23–35) for GVL, respectively (p < 0.01). VAS score for the difficulty of intubation was lower in GVL than DL (p < 0.01). Using GVL had higher first pass success rate and was faster and easier than DL when intubating patients with activated charcoal ingestion in a simulated situation.

Intubation; Charcoal; Simulation; Direct laryngoscope; Video laryngoscope

[1] Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM, Dicken JM. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2014; 9: 93–98.

[2] Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The Importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013; 20: 71–78.

[3] Sakles JC, Corn GJ, Hollinger P, Arcaris B, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM. The impact of a soiled airway on intubation success in the emergency department when using the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2017; 24: 628–636.

[4] Avidan A, Shapira Y, Cohen A, Weissman C, Levin PD. Difficult airway management practice changes after introduction of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2020; 37: 443–450.

[5] Moritz A, Leonhardt V, Prottengeier J, Birkholz T, Schmidt J, Irouschek A. Comparison of Glidescope® Go™, King Vision™, Dahlhausen VL, I-View™ and Macintosh laryngoscope use during difficult airway management simulation by experienced and inexperienced emergency medical staff: a randomized crossover manikin study. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0236474.

[6] Benjamin FJ, Boon D, French RA. An evaluation of the GlideScope®, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2006; 23: 517–521.

[7] Juurlink DN. Activated charcoal for acute overdose: a reappraisal. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2016; 81: 482–487.

[8] Toxicology AAOC, Centres EAOP, Toxicologists C. Position paper: single-dose activated charcoal. Clinical Toxicology. 2005; 43: 61–87.

[9] De Weerdt A, Snoeckx A, Germonpré P, Jorens PG. Rapid-onset adult respiratory distress syndrome after activated charcoal aspiration. A pitch-black tale of a potential to kill. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2015; 191: 344–345.

[10] Bond TC, Bergstrom RW. Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: an investigative review. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2006; 40: 27–67.

[11] Mihara R, Komasawa N, Matsunami S, Minami T. Comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes in vomitus and hematemesis settings: a randomized simulation trial. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 1–6.

[12] Brown CA, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 65: 363–370.e1.

[13] Altun D, Ozkan-Seyhan T, Orhan-Sungur M, Sivrikoz N, Camci E. Comparison of 4 laryngoscopes in 2 difficult airway scenarios. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2016; 11: 304–308.

[14] Ambrosio A, Pfannenstiel T, Bach K, Cornelissen C, Gaconnet C, Brigger MT. Difficult airway management for novice physicians. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2014; 150: 775–778.

[15] Gail MH. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1985; 6: 84.

[16] Byron Jones, Michael G. Kenward. Design and analysis of cross-over trials. 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York. 2003.

[17] Gaither JB, Spaite DW, Stolz U, Ennis J, Mosier J, Sakles JJ. Prevalence of difficult airway predictors in cases of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 47: 294–300.

[18] Combes X, Jabre P, Jbeili C, Leroux B, Bastuji-Garin S, Margenet A, et al. Prehospital standardization of medical airway management: incidence and risk factors of difficult airway. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2006; 13: 828–834.

[19] Burns B, Habig K, Eason H, Ware S. Difficult intubation factors in prehospital rapid sequence intubation by an Australian helicopter emergency medical service. Air Medical Journal. 2016; 35: 28–32.

[20] Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a cochrane systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017; 119: 369–383.

[21] Carlson JN, Crofts J, Walls RM, Brown CA, 3rd. Direct versus video laryngoscopy for intubating adult patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 16: 1052–1056.

[22] Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA. Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education. Critical Care Medicine. 2014; 42: 169–178.

[23] Daglius Dias R, Scalabrini Neto A. Stress levels during emergency care: a comparison between reality and simulated scenarios. Journal of Critical Care. 2016; 33: 8–13.

[24] Trimmel H, Kreutziger J, Fitzka R, Szüts S, Derdak C, Koch E, et al. Use of the GlideScope ranger video laryngoscope for emergency intubation in the prehospital setting. Critical Care Medicine. 2016; 44: e470–e476.