Comparison of perineural brachial plexus block and proximal perivascular block in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block

The traditional axillary perineural (PN) approach for brachial plexus block is frequently used, but separate musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) block is required and increases procedure time and patient discomfort. We hypothesized that a block using the proximal perivascular (PPV) method at the MCN branching from the lateral cord would obviate the need for an MCN block while ensuring a quality similar to that of the PN method. For the PN group (n = 25), a needle was placed on each nerve, and 8 mL local anesthetic was infiltrated around the radial, ulnar, and median nerves (total: 24 mL). We then injected 6 mL local anesthetic around the MCN. In the PPV group (n = 25), we moved the probe proximally until the branching junction of the the MCN in the lateral cord. The needle tips were placed in the 12-o’clock and 6-o’clock positions of the axillary artery, and 15 mL local anesthetic was injected (total: 30 mL). The procedure time, number of needle passes, procedure-related complications, sensory/motor block level, and onset time were recorded. The PPV group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the PN group (3.9 ± 1.0 vs. 7.5 ± 3.3 min, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the PPV group required fewer needle passes. The PN group showed a significantly faster onset time than the PPV group (6.4 ± 2.7 vs. 10.4 ± 2.9 min, p < 0.001). The induction time did not show significant intergroup difference. Sensory blockade in the PN group occurred significantly faster than that in the PPV group at 5 and 10 min. There were no significant differences in motor nerve paralysis. PPV axillary block under ultrasound guidance was as effective as the PN axillary block. Therefore, the PPV axillary block is a simple, safe and effective regional technique for upper limb surgery.

Brachial plexus block; Mepivacaine; Musculocutaneous nerve; Ultrasonography

[1] Chan VWS, Peng PWH, Kaszas Z, Middleton WJ, Muni R, Anastakis DG, et al. A comparative study of general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and axillary block for outpatient hand surgery: clinical outcome and cost analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2001; 93: 1181–1184.

[2] Mulimani S, Vastrad V, Talikoti D, Sorganvi V. A comparative clinical study of ultrasonography-guided perivascular and perineural axillary brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches. 2019; 13: 163.

[3] Casati A, Danelli G, Baciarello M, Corradi M, Leone S, Di Cianni S, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106: 992–996.

[4] Ustuner E, Yılmaz A, Özgencil E, Okten F, Turhan SC. Ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus nerves in the neurovascular bundle at the axilla in patients undergoing upper-extremity block anesthesia. Skeletal Radiology. 2013; 42: 707–713.

[5] Cho S, Kim YJ, Kim J, Baik H. Double-injection perivascular ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block according to needle positioning: 12 versus 6 o’clock position of the axillary artery. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014; 66: 112.

[6] Cho S, Kim YJ, Baik HJ, Kim JH, Woo JH. Comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques: perineural injection versus single or double perivascular infiltration. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2015; 56: 838.

[7] Ferraro LHC, Takeda A, Sousa PCCBD, Mehlmann FMG, Mitsunaga Junior JK, Falcão LFDR. Randomized prospective study of three different techniques for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018; 68: 62–68. (In Portuguese)

[8] Sites BD, Beach ML, Spence BC, Wiley CW, Shiffrin J, Hartman GS, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2006; 50: 678–684.

[9] Erdogmus NA, Baskan S, Zengin M, Demirelli G. What is the minimum effective volume of local anaesthetic applied in brachial plexus blockage with an axillary approach under ultrasonography guidance? Cureus. 2021; 13: e16865.

[10] González AP, Bernucci F, Pham K, Correa JA, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQH. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for double-injection ultrasound-guided axillary block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2013; 38: 16–20.

[11] Marhofer P, Schrögendorfer K, Wallner T, Koinig H, Mayer N, Kapral S. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 1998; 23: 584–588.

[12] Tran DQH, Pham K, Dugani S, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between double-, triple-, and quadruple-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2012; 37: 248–253.

[13] Bernucci F, Gonzalez AP, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQH. A prospective, randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2012; 37: 473–477.

[14] Chan VWS, Perlas A, McCartney CJL, Brull R, Xu D, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2007; 54: 176–182.

[15] Quinlan JJ, Oleksey K, Murphy FL. Alkalinization of mepivacaine for axillary block. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1992; 74: 371–374.

[16] Imasogie N, Ganapathy S, Singh S, Armstrong K, Armstrong P. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks using 2 versus 4 injections. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2010; 110: 1222–1226.

[17] Ambi U, Bhanupriya P, Hulkund S, Prakashappa D. Comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block using levobupivacaine: a prospective, randomised clinical study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015; 59: 658.

[18] Wong MH, George A, Varma M. Ultrasound-guided perivascular axillary brachial plexus block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2013; 38: 167.