Article Data

  • Views 1111
  • Dowloads 176

Original Research

Open Access

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difficulty in maintaining sufficient compression depth at the appropriate rate

  • Dae Sub Lee1
  • Mun Ki Min1,*,
  • Ji Ho Ryu1
  • Min Jee Lee1
  • Mo Se Chun1
  • Taegyu Hyun1
  • Seung Woo Shon1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Pusan National university Yangsan Hospital, School of medicine Pusan National university, 626-770 Yangsan-si, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2023.104 Vol.19,Issue 6,November 2023 pp.79-85

Submitted: 17 January 2023 Accepted: 07 March 2023

Published: 08 November 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Mun Ki Min E-mail:


Over the last 50 years, the recommended chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has become faster and deeper, but maintaining deep compressions may be difficult at higher rates. Our study aimed to determine whether adequate compression (chest compression at an appropriate depth and rate) is being performed in emergency departments (ED). We also investigated the effect of adequate compression performance on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). This prospective observational study was conducted at the EDs of two urban academic medical centers. We included adult patients (age ≥18 years) with cardiac arrest who underwent CPR in the ED between May and November 2020. We excluded patients with cardiac arrest related to trauma, repeated arrest except the first, and those for whom a monitor-defibrillator (ZOLL X-series) was not used. The following data were obtained from the monitor-defibrillator devices: compression depth, rate, chest compression fraction, CPR time, and percentage of compressions at the recommended rate and, at the recommended depth, at over and below rates, and depth, and at the appropriate depth and rate. Our study included 50 patients, from whom 441 chest compression sequences were obtained and analyzed. The mean compression depth, rate, and fraction were 6.48 ± 0.87 cm, 117 ± 5/min, 92.1 ± 3.70%, respectively. As the compression rate increased, the depth decreased, and most compressions were over-depth. Adequate compression (appropriate depth at recommended rate) was observed in 97 of the 441 compression sequences (21.9%). Below-depth and below-rate percentages were higher in the deceased group than that in the ROSC group (9.7 ± 15.2% vs. 3.3 ± 3.5%, p = 0.27; 2.7 ± 2.6% vs. 1.2± 0.9%, p = 0.06). The global ratio of chest compression showed low compliance with the recommended rate and depth, even when performed by skilled ED staff.


CPR; Compression depth; Compression rate

Cite and Share

Dae Sub Lee,Mun Ki Min,Ji Ho Ryu,Min Jee Lee,Mo Se Chun,Taegyu Hyun,Seung Woo Shon. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difficulty in maintaining sufficient compression depth at the appropriate rate. Signa Vitae. 2023. 19(6);79-85.


[1] Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabanas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020; 142: S366–S468.

[2] Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djärv T, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 115–151.

[3] Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 98–114.

[4] Duval S, Pepe PE, Aufderheide TP, Goodloe JM, Debaty G, Labarere J, et al. Optimal combination of compression rate and depth during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for functionally favorable survival. JAMA Cardiology. 2019; 4: 900–908.

[5] Idris AH, Guffey D, Aufderheide TP, Brown S, Morrison LJ, Nichols P, et al. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2012; 125: 3004–3012.

[6] Stiell IG, Brown SP, Christenson J, Cheskes S, Nichol G, Powell J, et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Critical Care Medicine. 2012; 40: 1192–1198.

[7] Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Cheskes S, Vaillancourt C, Callaway CW, et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation. 2014; 130: 1962–1970.

[8] Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, Brown SP, Brooks SC, Callaway CW, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Critical Care Medicine. 2015; 43: 840–848.

[9] Yannopoulos D, Aufderheide TP, Abella BS, Duval S, Frascone RJ, Goodloe JM, et al. Quality of CPR: an important effect modifier in cardiac arrest clinical outcomes and intervention effectiveness trials. Resuscitation. 2015; 94: 106–113.

[10] Agostinucci JM, Weisslinger L, Marzouk N, Zouaghi H, Ekpe K, Genthillomme A, et al. Relation between chest compression rate and depth: the ENFONCE Study. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 28: 352–354.

[11] Field RA, Soar J, Davies RP, Akhtar N, Perkins GD. The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions—a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 360–364.

[12] Idris AH. The sweet spot: chest compressions between 100–120/minute optimize successful resuscitation from cardiac rest. JEMS. 2012; 37: 4–9.

[13] Monsieurs KG, De Regge M, Vansteelandt K, De Smet J, Annaert E, Lemoyne S, et al. Excessive chest compression rate is associated with insufficient compression depth in prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 1319–1323.

[14] Kilgannon JH, Kirchhoff M, Pierce L, Aunchman N, Trzeciak S, Roberts BW. Association between chest compression rates and clinical outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest at an academic tertiary hospital. Resuscitation. 2017; 110: 154–161.

[15] Field RA, Yeung J, O’Carroll D, Davies RP, Perkins GD. Chest compressions in the emergency department: rate does not have to compromise compression depth. Resuscitation. 2013; 84: e13–e14

[16] Kern KB, Sanders AB, Raife J, Milander MM, Otto CW, Ewy GA. A study of chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans. The importance of rate-directed chest compressions. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992; 152: 145–149.

[17] Wolfe JA, Maier GW, Newton JR Jr, Glower DD, Tyson GS Jr, Spratt JA, et al. Physiologic determinants of coronary blood flow during external cardiac massage. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1988; 95: 523–532.

[18] Edelson DP, Abella BS, Kramer-Johansen J, Wik L, Myklebust H, Barry AM, et al. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006; 71: 137–145.

[19] Bellamy RF, DeGuzman LR, Pedersen DC. Coronary blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation. 1984; 69: 174–180.

[20] Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O’Hearn N, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005; 293: 305–310.

[21] Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sørebø H, Svensson L, Fellows B, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005; 293: 299–304.

[22] Wik L, Steen PA, Bircher NG. Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1994; 28: 195–203.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time