Article Data

  • Views 409
  • Dowloads 114

Original Research

Open Access

Analysis of factors influencing the acquisition of basic life support knowledge among standardized training trainees

  • Yao Wu1,2
  • Pan Pan1
  • E Pan1
  • Hong Li1,2,3,4,*,

1Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

2West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

3Institute of Disaster Medicine, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

4Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.054 Vol.20,Issue 5,May 2024 pp.24-32

Submitted: 07 October 2023 Accepted: 06 December 2023

Published: 08 May 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Hong Li E-mail: wuyaoyao198612223207@wchscu.cn

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly impacts the treatment success of cardiac arrest patients and serves as a simple and practical basic life support (BLS) skill. However, there is a lack of analysis regarding factors influencing BLS knowledge acquisition by trainees after training. In this study, we analyzed and explored this issue based on assessments of 385 trainees newly enrolled in standardized residency training at West China Hospital, Sichuan University in 2022. They came from various medical institutions and underwent a 3-day systematic training in basic life support skills. At the end of the training, their knowledge acquisition was analyzed through an examination. The results indicated that BLS knowledge acquisition scores among these 385 resident trainees were not significantly different in age, gender, education, length of service, professional title, or teaching style preference. However, two factors demonstrated significant influence: the trainees’ profession type (F = 39.45, p < 0.001) and previous BLS training (t = −4.42, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis indicated that technicians had a 12% lower BLS accuracy compared to doctors (β = −0.12, p < 0.001), while those who had received prior BLS training exhibited an 8% higher accuracy compared to those who had not (β = 0.08, p < 0.001). Thus, it is important to focus on enhancing BLS knowledge and skills among technician trainees in residency training. Additionally, increased standardization in BLS training can prove beneficial in improving trainees’ comprehension and mastery of BLS knowledge.


Keywords

Basic life support; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Trainees; Accuracy


Cite and Share

Yao Wu,Pan Pan,E Pan,Hong Li. Analysis of factors influencing the acquisition of basic life support knowledge among standardized training trainees. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(5);24-32.

References

[1] Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 133: e38–e360.

[2] Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 98–114.

[3] Nakagawa NK, Salles IC, Semeraro F, Böttiger BW. KIDS SAVE LIVES: a narrative review of associated scientific production. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2021; 27: 623–636.

[4] Sangamesh NC, Vidya KC, Pathi J, Singh A. Awareness, attitude, and knowledge of basic life support among medical, dental, and nursing faculties and students in the university hospital. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2017; 7: 161–167.

[5] D’Agostino F, Rossi P, Agrò FE, Fusco P, Ferri C, Ciccozzi M, et al. Basic life support training courses safety and infection risk in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemics. Resuscitation. 2021; 167: 107–108.

[6] Kurz MC, Schmicker RH, Leroux B, Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Cheskes S, et al. Advanced vs. basic life support in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in the resuscitation outcomes consortium. Resuscitation. 2018; 128: 132–137.

[7] Spinelli G, Brogi E, Sidoti A, Pagnucci N, Forfori F. Assessment of the knowledge level and experience of healthcare personnel concerning CPR and early defibrillation: an internal survey. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2021; 21: 195.

[8] Gupta R, DeSandro S, Doherty NA, Gardner AK, Pillow MT. Medical and physician assistant student competence in basic life support: opportunities to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020; 22: 101–107.

[9] Oliveira KMG, Carmona MJC, Mansur AP, Takada JY, Fijačko N, Semeraro F, et al. CPR quality assessment in schoolchildren training. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2022; 9: 398.

[10] Perkins GD, Graesner JT, Semeraro F, Olasveengen T, Soar J, Lott C, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: executive summary. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 1–60.

[11] Gautam Prasad Chaudhary, Kalyani Sah, Juhi Malla, Das N, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary I, et al. Knowledge regarding basic life support among health care workers of the hospital of Nepal. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2023; 2023: 9936114.

[12] Smeds MR, Thrush CR, McDaniel FK, Gill R, Kimbrough MK, Shames BD, et al. Relationships between study habits, burnout, and general surgery resident performance on the American Board of Surgery in-Training Examination. Journal of Surgical Research. 2017; 217: 217–225.

[13] Sabine Nabecker, Yves Balmer, Sander van Goor, Greif R. Piloting a basic life support instructor course: a short report. Resuscitation Plus. 2022; 12: 100325.

[14] Yeung J, Djarv T, Hsieh MJ, Sawyer T, Lockey A, Finn J, et al. Spaced learning versus massed learning in resuscitation—a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2020; 156: 61–71.

[15] Greif R, Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Bray J, Breckwoldt J, Cheng A, et al. Education, implementation, and teams: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020; 156: A188–A239.

[16] Abelairas-Gómez C, Martinez-Isasi S, Barcala-Furelos R, Varela-Casal C, Carballo-Fazanes A, Pichel-López M, et al. Training frequency for educating schoolchildren in basic life support: very brief 4-month rolling-refreshers versus annual retraining—a 2-year prospective longitudinal trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e052478.

[17] Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F. Basic life support and systems saving lives. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2021; 27: 617–622.

[18] Tadesse M, Seid SA, Getachew H, Ali SA. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards basic life support among graduating class health science and medical students at Dilla University; a cross sectional study. Annals of Medicine & Surgery. 2022; 82: 104588.

[19] Ssewante N, Wekha G, Iradukunda A, Musoke P, Kanyike AM, Nabukeera G, et al. Basic life support, a necessary inclusion in the medical curriculum: a cross-sectional survey of knowledge and attitude in Uganda. BMC Medical Education. 2022; 22: 140.

[20] Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, Atkins DL, Aziz K, Becker LB, et al. Interim guidance for basic and advanced life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: from the emergency cardiovascular care committee and get with the guidelines-resuscitation adult and pediatric task forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; 141: e933–e943.

[21] Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143: e35–e71.

[22] Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020; 142: S366–S468.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top