Discrepancy between emergency department diagnoses and discharge diagnoses in a tertiary center in KSA

Accurate diagnosis in the Emergency Department (ED) is critical for appropriate, timely treatment. Discrepancies between admission diagnosis by the ED team and discharge diagnosis by the admission team may lead to suboptimal care and have important implications on patient outcomes, resource utilization and hospital quality measures. This study aimed to explore the extent of such discrepancies in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and their impact on patient outcomes. This retrospective study at a tertiary medical center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (July–August 2019), using electronic medical record (EMR) review, included patients aged ≥14 years old admitted through the adult emergency department. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or cardiac care unit (CCU), or triaged to the obstetrics and gynaecology (OBGYN) or psychiatric areas of the emergency department were excluded from the study. ED and discharge diagnoses were checked by three physicians and classified into three categories: full, partial and mismatch. A partial match was defined when the ED diagnosis correlated with the final diagnosis to a certain extent and the final diagnosis could not be revealed in the ED setting. Of 771 patients, 692 (89.8%) had matched initial and final diagnoses, 52 (6.7%) had a partially matched diagnosis, and 27 (3.5%) had a complete mismatch between their ED diagnosis and discharge diagnosis. Among partial matches (n = 52), the most frequently observed reason was Magentic Resonance Imaging (MRI) performed during admission (48.08%) and endoscopy/colonoscopy (15.39%). Duration of hospital stay was not significantly associated with diagnosis mismatch. Although the discrepancy between admission and discharge diagnoses was relatively low, careful evaluation of patient complaints, medical history and laboratory and imaging results is critical for accurate diagnosis and management. Future research is needed to explore the impact of discrepancies in diagnosis on patient outcomes and to identify strategies to minimize them.

Emergency; Diagnosis; Match; Mismatch; Partial match; Saudi Arabia

[1] Adnan M, Ahmad M. Discrepancy between admission and discharge in Hospital University Sains Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 3: 7

[2] Zhang D, Yan B, He S, Tong S, Huang P, Zhang Q, et al. Diagnostic consistency between admission and discharge of pediatric cases in a tertiary teaching hospital in China. BMC Pediatrics. 2023; 23: 176.

[3] Bastakoti M, Muhailan M, Nassar A, Sallam T, Desale S, Fouda R, et al. Discrepancy between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis and its impact on length of stay, up-triage to the intensive care unit, and mortality. Diagnosis. 2022; 9: 107–114.

[4] Eames J, Eisenman A, Schuster RJ. Disagreement between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis: mortality and morbidity. Diagnosis. 2016; 3: 23–30.

[5] Fatima S, Shamim S, Butt AS, Awan S, Riffat S, Tariq M. The discrepancy between admission and discharge diagnoses: underlying factors and potential clinical outcomes in a low socioeconomic country. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0253316.

[6] Dregmans E, Kaal AG, Meziyerh S, Kolfschoten NE, van Aken MO, Schippers EF, et al. Analysis of variation between diagnosis at admission vs discharge and clinical outcomes among adults with possible bacteremia. JAMA Network Open. 2022; 5: e2218172.

[7] Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC, Yu-Moe CW, Clemens GD, Wang Z, et al. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2024; 33: 109–120.

[8] Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Medical Education. 2023; 23: 689.

[9] Al-Mashat H, Lindskou TA, Møller JM, Ludwig M, Christensen EF, Søvsø MB. Assessed and discharged-diagnosis, mortality and revisits in short-term emergency department contacts. BMC Health Services Research. 2022; 22: 816.

[10] Johnson T, McNutt R, Odwazny R, Patel D, Baker S. Discrepancy between admission and discharge diagnoses as a predictor of hospital length of stay. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2009; 4: 234–239.

[11] Leske MC, Sorensen AA, Zimmer JG. Discrepancies between admission and discharge diagnoses in a university hospital. Medical Care. 1978; 16: 740–748.

[12] Lim G, Seow E, Koh G, Tan D, Wong H. Study on the discrepancies between the admitting diagnoses from the emergency department and the discharge diagnoses. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002; 9: 78–82.

[13] McNutt R, Johnson T, Kane J, Ackerman M, Odwazny R, Bardhan J. Cost and quality implications of discrepancies between admitting and discharge diagnoses. Quality Management in Health Care. 2012; 21: 220–227.

[14] Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2007 emergency department summary. National Health Statistics Reports. 2010; 26: 1–31.

[15] Peng A, Rohacek M, Ackermann S, Ilsemann-Karakoumis J, Ghanim L, Messmer AS, et al. The proportion of correct diagnoses is low in emergency patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2015; 145: w14121.

[16] Pomero F, Borretta V, Bonzini M, Melchio R, Douketis JD, Fenoglio LM, et al. Accuracy of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2013; 109: 137–145.

[17] Wen L, Espinola J, Mosowsky J, Camargo C. Do emergency department patients receive a pathological diagnosis? A nationally-representative sample. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 16: 50–54.