Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Efficacy of using early multimodal vasopressor therapy on survival after septic shock in patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC database
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2Department of Ultrasound, Lanxi People’s Hospital, 321102 Lanxi, Zhejiang, China
3Department of Medicare Office, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4Department of Emergency Medicine, Lanxi People’s Hospital, 321102 Lanxi, Zhejiang, China
DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.117 Vol.20,Issue 9,September 2024 pp.110-117
Submitted: 29 June 2024 Accepted: 20 August 2024
Published: 08 September 2024
*Corresponding Author(s): Qi Li E-mail: zjlxlq@163.com
*Corresponding Author(s): Xiaoling Yang E-mail: HLB88669021@163.com
Early multimodal vasopressor therapy was proposed recently to treat septic shock. However, the association between multimodal vasopressor therapy initiation timing and survival was not determined. This study aimed to investigate the association between early multimodal vasopressor therapy and survival in septic shock patients necessitating high dose norepinephrine. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor at a maximum norepinephrine-equivalent dose >0.2 µg/kg/min. When the second vasopressor was initiated, patients were divided into three groups based on norepinephrine dosage. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included 90-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, and length of ICU and hospital stays. This study included 966 patients receiving a maximum norepinephrine-equivalent dose >0.2 µg/kg/min. Among them, 299 received an additional vasopressor when norepinephrine dose ≤0.2 µg/kg/min (early multimodal vasopressor therapy, EMMVT), 511 received an additional vasopressor when norepinephrine dose was between 0.2–0.5 µg/kg/min (later multimodal vasopressor therapy, LMMVT), and 156 received an additional vasopressor when norepinephrine dose ≥0.5 µg/kg/min (delayed multimodal vasopressor therapy, DMMVT). Age, admission type, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, metastatic cancer, liver diseases and obesity were associated with 28-day mortality. A significantly lower rate of 28-day, 90-day, ICU and hospital mortality was observed in the EMMVT group (p < 0.001 for all). In contrast to EMMVT, LMMVT (hazard ratio: 1.643, p < 0.001) and DMMVT (hazard ratio: 2.192, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of 28-day mortality after adjusting for confounding factors. Multimodal vasopressor groups and SOFA did not interact statistically. Septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor and reaching a maximum norepinephrine-equivalent dose >0.2 µg/kg/min benefited from early multimodal vasopressor therapy with improved 28-day mortality, regardless of illness severity.
Septic shock; Norepinephrine; Early multimodal vasopressor therapy; Vasopressor
Tingting Wang,Xiaohong Zhou,Peihao Yu,Jianqing Zhu,Qi Li,Xiaoling Yang. Efficacy of using early multimodal vasopressor therapy on survival after septic shock in patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC database. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(9);110-117.
[1] Bai X, Yu W, Ji W, Lin Z, Tan S, Duan K, et al. Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Critical Care. 2014; 18: 532.
[2] Wieruszewski PM, Khanna AK. Vasopressor choice and timing in vasodilatory shock. Critical Care. 2022; 26: 76.
[3] Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Medicine. 2021; 47: 1181–1247.
[4] Abe T, Umemura Y, Ogura H, Kushimoto S, Fujishima S, Saitoh D, et al. Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock. Acute Medicine & Surgery. 2023; 10: e852.
[5] Black LP, Puskarich MA, Smotherman C, Miller T, Fernandez R, Guirgis FW. Time to vasopressor initiation and organ failure progression in early septic shock. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open. 2020; 1: 222–230.
[6] Ruslan MA, Baharuddin KA, Noor NM, Yazid MB, Noh AYM, Rahman A. Norepinephrine in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 22: 196–203.
[7] Antonucci E, Polo T, Giovini M, Girardis M, Martin-Loeches I, Nielsen ND, et al. Refractory septic shock and alternative wordings: a systematic review of literature. Journal of Critical Care. 2023; 75: 154258.
[8] Trifi A, Abdellatif S, Mehdi A, Messaoud L, Seghir E, Mrad N, et al. Early administration of norepinephrine in sepsis: multicenter randomized clinical trial (EA-NE-S-TUN) study protocol. PLOS ONE. 2024; 19: e0307407.
[9] Martin C, Medam S, Antonini F, Alingrin J, Haddam M, Hammad E, et al. Norepinephrine: not too much, too long. Shock. 2015; 44: 305–309.
[10] Leone M, Einav S, Antonucci E, Depret F, Lakbar I, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Multimodal strategy to counteract vasodilation in septic shock. Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2023; 42: 101193.
[11] Venkatesh B, Khanna AK, Cohen J. Less is more: catecholamine-sparing strategies in septic shock. Intensive Care Medicine. 2019; 45: 1810–1812.
[12] Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hébert PC, Cooper DJ, et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008; 358: 877–887.
[13] Sacha GL, Lam SW, Wang L, Duggal A, Reddy AJ, Bauer SR: Association of catecholamine dose, lactate, and shock duration at vasopressin initiation with mortality in patients with septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2022; 50: 614–623.
[14] Johnson AE, Pollard TJ, Shen L, Lehman LW, Feng M, Ghassemi M, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific Data. 2016; 3: 160035.
[15] Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Critical Care Medicine. 2001; 29: 1303–1310.
[16] Chawla LS, Russell JA, Bagshaw SM, Shaw AD, Goldstein SL, Fink MP, et al. Angiotensin II for the treatment of high-output shock 3 (ATHOS-3): protocol for a phase III, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 2017; 19: 43–49.
[17] Khanna A, English SW, Wang XS, Ham K, Tumlin J, Szerlip H, et al. Angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017; 377: 419–430.
[18] Maurin C, Portran P, Schweizer R, Allaouchiche B, Junot S, Jacquet-Lagrèze M, et al. Effects of methylene blue on microcirculatory alterations following cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2022; 39: 333–341.
[19] de Oliveira FS, Freitas FG, Ferreira EM, de Castro I, Bafi AT, de Azevedo LC, et al. Positive fluid balance as a prognostic factor for mortality and acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock. Journal of Critical Care. 2015; 30: 97–101.
[20] Permpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, Trainarongsakul T, Chakorn T, Udompanturak S. Early use of norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER). A randomized trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2019; 199: 1097–1105.
[21] Li Y, Li H, Zhang D. Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2020; 24: 488.
[22] Ospina-Tascón GA, Hernandez G, Alvarez I, Calderón-Tapia LE, Manzano-Nunez R, Sánchez-Ortiz AI, et al. Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-based analysis. Critical Care. 2020; 24: 52.
[23] Huang H, Wu C, Shen Q, Xu H, Fang Y, Mao W. The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 48: 203–208.
[24] Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N, Perkins GD, Cecconi M, Cepkova M, et al. Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016; 316: 509–518.
[25] Ayyad A, Al-Horani RA. Terlipressin for the prevention and treatment of renal decline in hepatorenal syndrome: a drug profile. Gastroenterol Insights. 2023; 14: 420–430.
[26] Jakowenko ND, Murata J, Kopp BJ, Erstad BL. Influence of timing and catecholamine requirements on vasopressin responsiveness in critically ill patients with septic shock. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2022; 37: 1512–1519.
[27] Russell JA. Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock. Intensive Care Medicine. 2019; 45: 1503–1517.
[28] Teja B, Bosch NA, Walkey AJ. How we escalate vasopressor and corticosteroid therapy in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2023; 163: 567–574.
[29] Hernandez G, Carmona P, Ait-Oufella H. Monitoring capillary refill time in septic shock. Intensive Care Medicine. 2024; 50: 580–582.
[30] Heavner MS, McCurdy MT, Mazzeffi MA, Galvagno SM Jr, Tanaka KA, Chow JH. Angiotensin II and vasopressin for vasodilatory shock: a critical appraisal of catecholamine-sparing strategies. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2021; 36: 635–645.
[31] Guerci P, Belveyre T, Mongardon N, Novy E. When to start vasopressin in septic shock: the strategy we propose. Critical Care. 2022; 26: 125.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.
Top