Article Data

  • Views 260
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on inferior vena cava collapse index during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial

  • Hongbo Chen1
  • Qian Zhuo1
  • Yanya Zheng1
  • Jiajing Cai1
  • Juncheng Xiong1
  • Ziyuan Jin1,*,

1Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, 325027 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.066 Vol.21,Issue 5,May 2025 pp.55-61

Submitted: 08 May 2024 Accepted: 09 July 2024

Published: 08 May 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Ziyuan Jin E-mail: apple_cabin@163.com

Abstract

Background: This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of remimazolam compared to propofol on the inferior vena cava collapse index (IVC-CI) during general anesthesia induction. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive remimazolam (0.3 mg/kg; n = 30) or propofol (2–2.5 mg/kg; n = 30). IVC-CI was the primary outcome after induction. The recorded secondary outcomes included maximum and minimum diameters of inferior vena cava (dIVCmax and dIVCmin, respectively), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), bispectral index (BIS), and adverse events. Results: Among 60 patients, 59 were evaluable for the outcomes (1 canceled surgery). After administering the anesthesia, mean IVC-CI was 25.5% in remimazolam group vs. 26.1% in propofol group (adjusted mean difference, −0.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), −4.5 to 3.3), p = 0.755); mean dIVCmin was 1.26 mm vs. 1.30 mm (adjusted mean difference, 0 (95% CI, −0.12 to 0.13), p = 0.960); mean dIVCmax was 1.71 mm vs. 1.77 mm (adjusted mean difference, −0.04 (95% CI, −0.21 to 0.14), p = 0.693); mean MAP was 81.4 mmHg vs. 75.5 mmHg (adjusted mean difference, 5.6 mmHg (95% CI, 1.8 to 9.3), p = 0.005); mean HR was 77.7 bpm vs. 69.3 bpm (adjusted mean difference, 7.9 bpm (95% CI, 5.2 to 10.6), p < 0.001); and mean BIS was 55.6 vs. 54.0, respectively (adjusted mean difference, 1.7 (95% CI, −1.0 to 4.4), p = 0.215). Hypotension was recorded in 2 (6.7%) vs. 9 (31.0%) (p = 0.016), while injection pain in 0 vs. 11 (37.9%) (p < 0.001). There was no agitation, bradycardia, reflux aspiration or bronchospasm. Conclusions: The remimazolam usage for anesthesia induction did not significantly reduce the IVC-CI compared to propofol. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered on www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300070911).


Keywords

Remimazolam; Propofol; Hypotension; Inferior vena cava ultrasound


Cite and Share

Hongbo Chen,Qian Zhuo,Yanya Zheng,Jiajing Cai,Juncheng Xiong,Ziyuan Jin. Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on inferior vena cava collapse index during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(5);55-61.

References

[1] Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, et al. Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126: 47–65.

[2] Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, Slooter AJC, van Klei WA. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018; 121: 706–721.

[3] Sessler DI, Khanna AK. Perioperative myocardial injury and the contribution of hypotension. Intensive Care Medicine. 2018; 44: 811–822.

[4] Maheshwari K, Turan A, Mao G, Yang D, Niazi AK, Agarwal D, et al. The association of hypotension during non-cardiac surgery, before and after skin incision, with postoperative acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73: 1223–1228.

[5] Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, Gemrotova M, Vymazal T, Litschmannova M, et al. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. Journal of Anesthesia. 2018; 32: 673–680.

[6] Hu Q, Liu X, Wen C, Li D, Lei X. Remimazolam: an updated review of a new sedative and anaesthetic. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2022; 16: 3957–3974.

[7] Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, Sakamoto A, Yamakage M, Suzuki T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. Journal of Anesthesia. 2020; 34: 543–553.

[8] Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Zhu S. Application effects of remimazolam and propofol on elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. BMC Anesthesiology. 2022; 22: 118.

[9] Wong GTC, Irwin MG. Post-induction hypotension: a fluid relationship? Anaesthesia. 2021; 76: 15–18.

[10] Szabó M, Bozó A, Darvas K, Horváth A, Iványi ZD. Role of inferior vena cava collapsibility index in the prediction of hypotension associated with general anesthesia: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiology. 2019; 19: 139.

[11] Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015; 28: 1–39.e14.

[12] Kaptein MJ, Kaptein EM. Inferior vena cava collapsibility index: clinical validation and application for assessment of relative intravascular volume. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 2021; 28: 218–226.

[13] Dai G, Pei L, Duan F, Liao M, Zhang Y, Zhu M, et al. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2021; 87: 1073–1079.

[14] Qiu Y, Gu W, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Wu J. The hemodynamic stability of remimazolam compared with propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized trial. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022; 9: 938940.

[15] Casalta H, Busoni V, Eppe J, Grulke S, Merveille AC, Moula N, et al. Ultrasonographical assessment of caudal vena cava size through different views in healthy calves: a pilot study. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9: 308.

[16] Green DW. Cardiac output decrease and propofol: what is the mechanism? British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015; 114: 163–164.

[17] Zucker M, Kagan G, Adi N, Ronel I, Matot I, Zac L, et al. Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol. BMC Anesthesiology. 2022; 22: 234.

[18] Lan H, Cao H, Liu S, Gong X, Huang X, Rong H, et al. Efficacy of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in urological surgery: a randomised clinical trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2024; 41: 208–216.

[19] Mao Y, Guo J, Yuan J, Zhao E, Yang J. Quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam in patients’ undergoing urologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing remimazolam with propofol. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2022; 16: 1199–1209.

[20] Zhang X, Li S, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2021; 21: 156.

[21] Liu T, Lai T, Chen J, Lu Y, He F, Chen Y, et al. Effect of remimazolam induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives. 2021; 9: e00851.

[22] Fechner J, El-Boghdadly K, Spahn DR, Motsch J, Struys M, Duranteau O, et al. Anaesthetic efficacy and postinduction hypotension with remimazolam compared with propofol: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2024; 79: 410–422.

[23] Sekiguchi R, Kinoshita M, Kawanishi R, Kakuta N, Sakai Y, Tanaka K. Comparison of hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia with remimazolam and target-controlled propofol in middle-aged and elderly patients: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2023; 23: 14.

[24] Kaptein EM, Kaptein MJ. Inferior vena cava ultrasound and other techniques for assessment of intravascular and extravascular volume: an update. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2023; 16: 1861–1877.

[25] Di Nicolò P, Tavazzi G, Nannoni L, Corradi F. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography for volume status evaluation: an intriguing promise never fulfilled. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 2217.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top