Comparison of postcontrast acute kidney injury based on previous and current diagnostic criteria following cerebral angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a comparative case-control study

Background: Physicians often face challenges in deciding whether to perform imaging for patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS) in the emergency department due to concerns about postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) risk. The conventional PC-AKI definition has been criticized for overestimating AKI incidence, leading to the introduction of a revised diagnostic criterion. However, There is limited research on how well this new definition reflects PC-AKI, particularly regarding diagnostic rate changes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing cerebral angiography. This study aimed to assess the impact of updated diagnostic criteria on PC-AKI incidence in patients with AIS undergoing cerebral angiography in emergency departments. Methods: We hypothesized that the new criteria would result in lower PC-AKI diagnosis rates compared to the previous criteria. Data of 381 patients aged ≥18 years with AIS who visited the emergency department at a tertiary university hospital in Seoul, South Korea, and who underwent cerebral angiography between October 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. After applying selection criteria, 361 patients were included in the analysis. The primary outcome measure was the PC-AKI incidence based on previous and updated diagnostic criteria. Secondary outcomes included subgroup PC-AKI incidence analyses based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) intervals and prognostic outcome comparisons using area under the curve (AUC) values with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The incidence of PC-AKI was significantly lower under the updated criteria compared with the previous criteria (p = 0.048). Using the relative criterion resulted in nearly a three-fold lower PC-AKI incidence (p = 0.002). Patients with baseline eGFRs ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 also had a significantly lower PC-AKI incidence under the updated criteria (p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the updated PC-AKI diagnostic criteria result in a lower reported incidence than the previous criteria, which may influence clinical decision-making in patients with AIS.

Acute kidney injury; Ischemic stroke; Cerebral angiography

[1] Chusiri S, Chutinet A, Suwanwela NC, Puttilerpong C. Incidence and risk factors of postcontrast acute kidney injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2020; 2020: 7182826.

[2] Myung JW, Kim JH, Cho J, Park I, Kim HY, Beom JH. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in radiologic management of acute ischemic stroke in the emergency setting. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020; 41: 632–636.

[3] Berglund F, Eilertz E, Nimmersjö F, Wolf A, Nordlander C, Palm F, et al. Acute and long-term renal effects after iodine contrast media-enhanced computerised tomography in the critically ill—a retrospective bi-centre cohort study. European Radiology. 2024; 34: 1736–1745.

[4] Cheng W, Wu X, Liu Q, Wang H, Zhang N, Xiao Y, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury in a hospitalized population: short-, mid-, and long-term outcome and risk factors for adverse events. European Radiology. 2020; 30: 3516–3527.

[5] Jeon JP, Chen CH, Tsuang FY, Liu J, Hill MD, Zhang L, et al. Impact of renal impairment on short-term outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Stroke. 2022; 17: 733–745.

[6] Fandler-Höfler S, Odler B, Kneihsl M, Wünsch G, Haidegger M, Poltrum B, et al. Acute and chronic kidney dysfunction and outcome after stroke thrombectomy. Translational Stroke Research. 2021; 12: 791–798.

[7] Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, et al.; Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. European Radiology. 2011; 21: 2527–2541.

[8] Rudnick MR, Leonberg-Yoo AK, Litt HI, Cohen RM, Hilton S, Reese PP. The controversy of contrast-induced nephropathy with intravenous contrast: what is the risk? American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2020; 75: 105–113.

[9] Nyman U, Leander P, Liss P, Sterner G, Brismar T. Correction: absolute and relative GFR and contrast medium dose/GFR ratio: cornerstones when predicting the risk of acute kidney injury. European Radiology. 2024; 34: 2123–2124.

[10] van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin M, Bertolotto M, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury—Part 1: definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors: recommendations for updated ESUR contrast medium safety committee guidelines. European Radiology. 2018; 28: 2845–2855.

[11] Chomicka I, Kwiatkowska M, Lesniak A, Malyszko J. Post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients with various stages of chronic kidney disease—is fear justified? Toxins. 2021; 13: 395.

[12] Obed M, Gabriel MM, Dumann E, Vollmer Barbosa C, Weißenborn K, Schmidt BMW. Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computerized tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 propensity score—matched cohort studies. European Radiology. 2022; 32: 8432–8442.

[13] Thomsen HS, Morcos SK. Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. The British Journal of Radiology. 2003; 76: 513–518.

[14] Vandenberghe W, Hoste E. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: does it really exist, and if so, what to do about it? F1000Research. 2019; 8: 753.

[15] Chomicka I, Kwiatkowska M, Małyszko J. Post-contrast acute kidney injury following computed tomography: a real or overestimated threat? Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. 2020; 130: 704–707.

[16] Budano C, Levis M, D’Amico M, Usmiani T, Fava A, Sbarra P, et al. Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury definition on clinical outcomes. American Heart Journal. 2011; 161: 963–971.

[17] Pyxaras SA, Zhang Y, Wolf A, Schmitz T, Naber CK. Effect of varying definitions of contrast-induced acute kidney injury and left ventricular ejection fraction on one-year mortality in patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 116: 426–430.

[18] Slocum NK, Grossman PM, Moscucci M, Smith DE, Aronow HD, Dixon SR, et al. The changing definition of contrast-induced nephropathy and its clinical implications: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). American Heart Journal. 2012; 163: 829–834.

[19] Centola M, Lucreziotti S, Salerno-Uriarte D, Sponzilli C, Ferrante G, Acquaviva R, et al. A comparison between two different definitions of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Cardiology. 2016; 210: 4–9.

[20] Sebastià C, Nicolau C, Martín de Francisco ÁL, Poch E, Oleaga L. Prophylaxis against postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI): updates in the ESUR guidelines 10.0 and critical review. Radiología. 2020; 62: 292–297.

[21] Dekkers IA, Olchowy C, Thomsen HS, Molen AJV. Adherence to guidelines aimed at preventing post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in radiology practices: a survey study. Acta Radiologica. 2021; 62: 979–984.

[22] Kooiman J, Pasha SM, Zondag W, Sijpkens YW, van der Molen AJ, Huisman MV, et al. Meta-analysis: serum creatinine changes following contrast enhanced CT imaging. European Journal of Radiology. 2012; 81: 2554–2561.

[23] Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, Berger PB, Ting HH, Bets PJ, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2259–2264.

[24] Moos SI, van Vemde DN, Stoker J, Bipat S. Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Radiology. 2013; 82: e387–e399.

[25] Guillon B, Ecarnot F, Marcucci C, Ducloux D, Chatot M, Badoz M, et al. Incidence, predictors, and impact on six-month mortality of three different definitions of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after coronary angiography. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2018; 121: 818–824.

[26] Flammia RS, Tufano A, Proietti F, Gerolimetto C, DE Nunzio C, Franco G, et al. Renal surgery for kidney cancer: is preoperative proteinuria a predictor of functional and survival outcomes after surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Minerva Urology and Nephrology. 2022; 74: 255–264.

[27] Schmid M, Dalela D, Tahbaz R, Langetepe J, Randazzo M, Dahlem R, et al. Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury: evaluation and evidence in urologic surgery. World Journal of Nephrology. 2015; 4: 160–168.

[28] Laible M, Jenetzky E, Möhlenbruch MA, Bendszus M, Ringleb PA, Rizos T. The impact of post-contrast acute kidney injury on in-hospital mortality after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; 12: 665614.

[29] van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin MF, Bertolotto M, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury. Part 2: risk stratification, role of hydration and other prophylactic measures, patients taking metformin and chronic dialysis patients: recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. European Radiology. 2018; 28: 2856–2869.