Article Data

  • Views 75
  • Dowloads 11

Original Research

Open Access

Low dose esketamine for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

  • Dongsheng Hu1
  • Danni Li1
  • Honggang Wang2
  • Wei Hu1
  • Lijun An1,*,

1Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 223301 Huaian, Jiangsu, China

2Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 223301 Huaian, Jiangsu, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.110 Vol.21,Issue 8,August 2025 pp.30-36

Submitted: 05 November 2024 Accepted: 06 March 2025

Published: 08 August 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Lijun An E-mail: hayyalj@njmu.edu.cn

Abstract

Background: Propofol and remifentanil are frequently used together for painless therapeutic gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. However, this combination can result in respiratory and cardiovascular depression. The use of esketamine has the potential to counteract these adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine combined with a fixed dose of propofol-remifentanil sedation during painless therapeutic GI endoscopy. Methods: A total of 400 patients undergoing painless therapeutic GI endoscopy were randomly divided into four groups (n = 100 per group). The control group received propofol and remifentanil, while the other three groups received propofol and remifentanil plus 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mg/kg/h esketamine. Throughout the procedure, we recorded hemodynamics, pulse oxygen saturation, somatic responses, adverse event management, emergence delirium and perioperative Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Results: Respiratory interventions were significantly higher in the control groupcompared to three esketamine groups (elevated oxygen flow: 15% vs. 2%, 2% and 4%; mandibular support: 10% vs. 1%, 1% and 3%; mask ventilation: 4% vs. 0%, 0% and 0%). Hypotension and bradycardia occurred more frequently in the control group (hypotension: 13% vs. 3%, 1% and 1%; bradycardia: 15% vs. 5%, 3% and 2%). Although there were no significant differences in gagging among the groups, a reduced response to body movement was documented in patients randomized to esketamine when compared to the control group (1% vs. 13%). No significant changes were observed in MMSE scores in any of the groups. Conclusions: The continuous infusion of small-dose esketamine in addition to propofol-remifentanil sedation could provide efficient and safe sedation for painless therapeutic GI endoscopic procedures. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2400079866). Date of registration: 15 January 2024.


Keywords

Esketamine; Propofol-remifentanil; Fixed-dose; Sedation; Gastrointestinal endoscopy


Cite and Share

Dongsheng Hu,Danni Li,Honggang Wang,Wei Hu,Lijun An. Low dose esketamine for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(8);30-36.

References

[1] Zhou S, Zhu Z, Dai W, Qi S, Tian W, Zhang Y, et al. National survey on sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in 2758 Chinese hospitals. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 127: 56–64.

[2] Zhong J, Zhang J, Fan Y, Zhu M, Zhao X, Zuo Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2023; 85: 111047.

[3] Wu B, Zhu W, Wang Q, Ren C, Wang L, Xie G. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022; 13: 1091579.

[4] Joy PJ, Blanshard HJ. Propofol-remifentanil patient-controlled sedation for endoscopic procedures: a prospective service audit. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2023; 70: 1735–1743.

[5] Wu J, Li N, Zhang J, Tang X, Cao X. Safety and efficacy of remifentanil-propofol combination on “muscle relaxant-free” general anesthesia for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Translational Research. 2023; 15: 5292–5303.

[6] De Vico P, Biasucci DG, Aversano L, Polidoro R, Zingaro A, Millarelli FR, et al. Feasibility and safety of deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil in spontaneous breathing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an observational prospective study. BMC Anesthesiology. 2023; 23: 260.

[7] Feeney A, Papakostas GI. Pharmacotherapy: ketamine and esketamine. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2023; 46: 277–290.

[8] Wu J, Gu J, Qiu L, Jin X, Zhou Z. Challenges for esketamine nasal spray in China: use and management. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2024; 15: 1429435.

[9] Mildh L, Taittonen M, Leino K, Kirvelä O. The effect of low-dose ketamine on fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53: 965–970.

[10] Algera MH, Kamp J, van der Schrier R, van Velzen M, Niesters M, Aarts L, et al. Opioid-induced respiratory depression in humans: a review of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of reversal. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019; 122: e168–e179.

[11] Jonkman K, van Rijnsoever E, Olofsen E, Aarts L, Sarton E, van Velzen M, et al. Esketamine counters opioid-induced respiratory depression. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018; 120: 1117–1127.

[12] Jansen SC, van Velzen M, Sarton E, Dahan A, Niesters M, van der Schrier R. Acute effects of esketamine on hypoxic ventilatory response, haemodynamics, and brain function in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2024; 134: 557–563.

[13] Dahan A, van der Schrier R, Smith T, Aarts L, van Velzen M, Niesters M. Averting opioid-induced respiratory depression without affecting analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2018; 128: 1027–1037.

[14] Suleiman A, Wongtangman K, Eikermann M, Stucke AG. Neuroanatomical and pharmaco-physiological effects of hypoxia and esketamine on breathing, the sympathetic nerve system, and cortical function. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2025; 134: 277–280.

[15] Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1990; 10: 244–251.

[16] Bower AL, Ripepi A, Dilger J, Boparai N, Brody FJ, Ponsky JL. Bispectral index monitoring of sedation during endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2000; 52: 192–196.

[17] Qadeer MA, Vargo JJ, Patel S, Dumot JA, Lopez AR, Trolli PA, et al. Bispectral index monitoring of conscious sedation with the combination of meperidine and midazolam during endoscopy. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2008; 6: 102–108.

[18] Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 1995; 7: 89–91.

[19] Kamp J, van Velzen M, Aarts L, Niesters M, Dahan A, Olofsen E. Stereoselective ketamine effect on cardiac output: a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling study in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 127: 23–31.

[20] Li Y, Wu ZY, Zheng WC, Wang JX, Yue X, Song RX, et al. Esketamine alleviates postoperative cognitive decline via stimulator of interferon genes/TANK-binding kinase 1 signaling pathway in aged rats. Brain Research Bulletin. 2022; 187: 169–180.

[21] Qiu LL, Pan W, Luo D, Zhang GF, Zhou ZQ, Sun XY, et al. Dysregulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling mediated by NMDAR/Ca2+/calpain might contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aging mice. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2020; 17: 23.

[22] Yin S, Hong J, Sha T, Chen Z, Guo Y, Li C, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of sufentanil, dexmedetomidine, or ketamine added to propofol-based sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Therapeutics. 2019; 41: 1864–1877.e0.

[23] Zhan Y, Liang S, Yang Z, Luo Q, Li S, Li J, et al. Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterology. 2022; 22: 391.

[24] Jang SY, Park HG, Jung MK, Cho CM, Park SY, Jeon SW, et al. Bispectral index monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered combined sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012; 18: 6284–6289.

[25] Carrara L, Nault M, Morisson L, Godin N, Idrissi M, Fortier A, et al. The impact of bolus versus continuous infusion of intravenous ketamine on bispectral index variations and desflurane administration during major surgery: the KETABIS study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2021; 38: 1168–1179.

[26] Salloum E, Lotte Seibold E, Azimaraghi O, Rudolph MI, Beier J, Schaefer MS, et al. Association of ketamine use during procedural sedation with oxygen desaturation and healthcare utilisation: a multicentre retrospective hospital registry study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2024; 132: 779–788.

[27] Absalom AR, Rigby-Jones AE, Rushton AR, Robert Sneyd J. De-mystifying the “Mixifusor”. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2020; 30: 1292–1298.

[28] Malherbe S, Barker N. Mixing of propofol and remifentanil. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2021; 31: 504–505.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top