Article Data

  • Views 79
  • Dowloads 8

Original Research

Open Access

Ultrasonographic measurement of gastric volume in critically ill patients nourished with different enteral feeding protocols

  • İlkay Ceylan1,*,
  • Serpil Ekin1
  • Hamide Ayben Korkmaz1
  • İsa Kilic2

1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, SBU Bursa Training and Research Hospital, 16310 Bursa, Turkey

2Departmen of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, SBU Bursa City Training and Research Hospital, 16110 Bursa, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.111 Vol.21,Issue 8,August 2025 pp.37-44

Submitted: 16 October 2024 Accepted: 20 March 2025

Published: 08 August 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): İlkay Ceylan E-mail: ilkay.ceylan@sagik.gov.tr

Abstract

Background: Gastric residual volume monitoring is still widely used in clinical practice for early detection of gastric intolerance. This study investigated the compatibility of gastric volume measurements by ultrasound with the free drainage method in intensive care patients receiving enteral nutrition with three different protocols. Methods: Patients were divided into 3 groups according to different nutrition protocols applied in our clinic. Gastric ultrasound was performed in the right lateral decubitus position. Antral cross-sectional area was calculated using the Bolondi formula and gastric volume was calculated using Perlas and Tacken formulas. After, the patient was placed supine, a nasogastric feeding catheter was placed in gravity/free drainage for one hour in all groups and gastric residual volumes were recorded. Results: 82 intensive care unit patients were included. Spearman’s correlation analysis showed a correlation between gastric residual volume and the other three values (cross-sectional area, gastric volume obtained by Perlas and Tacken formula) (p < 0.05) in each feeding group. Based on the Bland-Altman analysis, Perlas seems to be a more reliable alternative to GRV due to the smaller differences and less variability. Conclusions: We found a positive correlation between gastric volume determined by gastric ultrasound and gastric residual volume determined by the drainage method, with no difference between the different feeding protocols. Using ultrasound assessment, gastric volume can be predicted without interruption of enteral nutrition in patients fed semi-solid feeding solutions. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06700759.


Keywords

Gastric ultrasonogrophy; Enteral nutrition; Gastric residual volume; Monitoring nutritional intolerance


Cite and Share

İlkay Ceylan,Serpil Ekin,Hamide Ayben Korkmaz,İsa Kilic. Ultrasonographic measurement of gastric volume in critically ill patients nourished with different enteral feeding protocols. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(8);37-44.

References

[1] Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 48–79.

[2] Elmokadem EM, El Borolossy RM, Bassiouny AM, Hanna MG, Darweesh EAG, Sabri NA. The efficacy and safety of itopride in feeding intolerance of critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a randomized, double-blind study. BMC Gastroenterology. 2021; 21: 126.

[3] Martindale R, Patel JJ, Taylor B, Arabi YM, Warren M, McClave SA. Nutrition therapy in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2020; 44: 1174–1184.

[4] Elke G, Felbinger TW, Heyland DK. Gastric residual volume in critically ill patients: a dead marker or still alive? Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2015; 30: 59–71.

[5] Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 113: 12–22.

[6] Sharma V, Gudivada D, Gueret R, Bailitz, J. Ultrasound-assessed gastric antral area correlates with aspirated tube feed volume in enterally fed critically ill patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2017; 32: 206–211.

[7] Perlas A, Chan VW, Lupu CM, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111: 82–89.

[8] Bolondi L, Bortolotti M, Santi V, Calletti T, Gaiani S, Labo G. Measurement of gastric emptying time by real-time ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1985; 89: 752–759.

[9] Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2013; 116: 357–363.

[10] Tacken MCT, van Leest TAJ, van de Putte P, Keijzer C, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric volumes of thick fluids: validating a prediction model. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2021; 38: 1223–1229.

[11] McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2016; 40: 159–211.

[12] Bouvet L, Mazoit JX, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E, Benhamou D. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 1086–1092.

[13] Perlas A, Davis L, Khan M, Mitsakakis N, Chan VW. Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: a prospective descriptive study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2011; 113: 93–97.

[14] Taskin G, Inal V, Yamanel L. Does ultrasonographic assessment of gastric antrum correlate with gastric residual volume in critically ill patients? A prospective observational study. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2021; 35: 923–929.

[15] Sharma R, Dogra RK, Pathania J, Sharma A. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography over manual aspiration for gastric reserve volume estimation in critically ill patients. Acute and Critical Care. 2023; 38: 134–141.

[16] Feng L, Chen J, Xu Q. Is monitoring of gastric residual volume for critically ill patients with enteral nutrition necessary? A meta-analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2023; 29: e13124.

[17] Uysal N, Mete S. Comparison of two different methods for the measurement of gastric residual volume. Gastroenterology Nursing. 2017; 40: 300–305.

[18] Jahreis T, Kretschmann J, Weidner N, Volk T, Meiser A, Groesdonk HV. Sonographic evaluation of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients using a miniaturized ultrasound device. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10: 4859.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top