Article Data

  • Views 81
  • Dowloads 18

Original Research

Open Access

Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries

  • Onur Sarban1
  • Engin İhsan Turan2,*,
  • Özal Adiyeke3
  • Ergün Mendes3
  • Hilal Akça3
  • Funda Gumus Özcan3

1Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust Brighton, BN2 5BE Brighton, UK

2Department of Anesthesiology, Istanbul Health Science University Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital, 34303 İstanbul, Turkey

3Department of Anesthesiology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34480 İstanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.113 Vol.21,Issue 8,August 2025 pp.55-60

Submitted: 12 December 2024 Accepted: 21 February 2025

Published: 08 August 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Engin İhsan Turan E-mail: ihsanengin.turan@sbu.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy (AFB) is an essential technique for securing the airway in patients with complex anatomical challenges, such as laryngeal masses, where conventional intubation may be difficult. This study compares the efficacy of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 76 patients who underwent AFB for tracheal intubation between January 2021 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two sedation groups: Remifentanil (n = 38) and Dexmedetomidine (n = 38). The primary outcomes included intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, patient comfort scores, and postoperative cough scores. Sedation was titrated to achieve a Ramsay sedation score of 3–4, and to ensure comparability, baseline characteristics such as demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications and Mallampati scores were compared. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly shorter intubation times (52.39 ± 16.94 vs. 70.50 ± 20.42 seconds, p < 0.01), fewer intubation attempts (1.58 ± 0.56 vs. 2.08 ± 0.62, p < 0.01) and better patient comfort scores (1.82 ± 0.56 vs. 2.13 ± 0.62, p = 0.02). Additionally, postoperative cough scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group (2.00 ± 0.61 vs. 2.32 ± 0.57, p = 0.02), indicating reduced airway irritation after the procedure. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine was associated with superior sedation compared to remifentanil for AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery due to improved patient comfort, shortened intubation time and reduced number of intubation attempts. The lower postoperative cough scores further suggest a potential benefit in minimizing airway irritation. Given its minimal respiratory depressive effects and enhanced procedural efficiency, dexmedetomidine could be the preferred sedative agent for AFB in this patient population.


Keywords

Awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy; Sedation; Remifentanil; Dexmedetomidine; Laryngeal surgery


Cite and Share

Onur Sarban,Engin İhsan Turan,Özal Adiyeke,Ergün Mendes,Hilal Akça,Funda Gumus Özcan. Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(8);55-60.

References

[1] Hyman JB, Rosenblatt WH. Awake intubation techniques, and why it is still an important skill to master. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2022; 12: 382–389.

[2] Merola R, Vargas M, Marra A, Buonanno P, Coviello A, Servillo G, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13: 3186.

[3] Wilhelm W, Kreuer S. The place for short-acting opioids: special emphasis on remifentanil. Critical Care. 2008; 12: S5.

[4] Deasy A, Doody K. Dexmedetomidine—a superior sedative agent for patients undergoing awake fibreoptic intubation. Irish Medical Journal. 2023; 116: 755.

[5] Zhou L, Huang Y, Zhou R, Liu S. Comparison of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in awake endotracheal intubation in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective analysis. Medical Science Monitor. 2024; 30: e944632.

[6] Kollmeier BR, Boyette LC, Beecham GB, Desai NM, Khetarpal S. Difficult airway. StatPearls: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[7] Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 129: 612–623.

[8] El-Boghdadly K, Desai N, Jones JB, Elghazali S, Ahmad I, Sneyd JR. Sedation for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2025; 80: 74–84.

[9] Cattano D, Lam NC, Ferrario L, Seitan C, Vahdat K, Wilcox DW, et al. Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2012; 2012: 753107.

[10] Sancheti AG, Swami SS, Konnur SL, Amin N. A comparative study between local dexmedetomidine and intravenous dexmedetomidine during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches. 2022; 16: 407–411.

[11] Hu R, Liu JX, Jiang H. Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anesthesia. 2013; 27: 211–217.

[12] Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, Kessin C, Preston PG, Lobo EP. Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology. 1998; 88: 1467–1474.

[13] Rao S, Rai S, Das PK, Kumar S, Malviya D, Tripathi M. Effect of use of high-flow nasal cannula during fiberoptic intubation under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches. 2020; 14: 632–637.

[14] Chen Q, Qin B, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Shi X, Xie Y. The safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared to dexmedetomidine for awake tracheal intubation by flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2024; 18: 967–978.

[15] Arora S, Govardhane BT, Srinivasan V, Karandikar G. Evaluation of different doses of dexmedetomidine for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial and oral malignancy surgeries: a randomised, double-blind study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2024; 68: 447–53.

[16] Rao PN, Soffin EM, Beckman JD. Comparative review of airway anesthesia and sedation methods for awake intubation. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2023; 36: 547–559.

[17] Tang ZH, Chen Q, Wang X, Su N, Xia Z, Wang Y, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for awake fiberoptic endoscope intubation. Medicine. 2021; 100: e25324.

[18] Acharya R, Sriramka B, Koushik P. Comparison of dexmedetomidine alone with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl during awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airway: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2022; 22: 349–356.

[19] Sachan M, Singh NK, Naithani B, Abbas H, Dube M, Naithani B. Comparative study of intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes during awake fiber-optic intubation using midazolam with fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine in cases of difficult airway. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022; 13: 201–207.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top