Basic life support research trends in Korea

Background: Basic life support (BLS) is a critical emergency procedure that significantly increases survival rates during cardiac emergencies. Despite its importance, research trends remain largely underexplored. Methods: We analyzed 121 peer-reviewed Korean research articles (2014–2023) using latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling. Relevant articles were retrieved from five major Korean academic databases (Database Periodical Information Academic, Korean Studies Information Service System, Research Information Sharing Systems, Korea Citation Index and Science Online) ensuring a comprehensive analysis of domestic research trends. Keywords from the abstracts and titles were extracted and processed for topic modeling and network text analysis. Results: Three primary topics were identified: BLS Education and Training, Emergency Treatment and Life-Sustaining Measures, and Emergency Situations and Experience. The focus on “Emergency Situations and Experience” declined from 65.79% (2014–2016) to 55.88% (2020–2023), while studies on “BLS Education and Training” increased from 21.05% to 32.35% over the same period. Conclusions: We identified a shift in research priorities from experience-based studies to structured education and training programs. This trend demonstrates the growing emphasis on standardized BLS training methodologies to improve the effectiveness of emergency response efforts.

Basic life support; Topic modeling; Research trends; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Training programs; Emergency response

[1] Olasveengen TM, Mancini ME, Perkins GD, Avis S, Brooks S, Castrén M, et al.; Adult Basic Life Support Collaborators. Adult basic life support: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2020; 142: S41–S91.

[2] Wyckoff MH, Singletary EM, Soar J, Olasveengen TM, Greif R, Liley HG, et al. Correction to: 2021 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; first aid task forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group. Circulation. 2022; 145: e760.

[3] Barde BV, Bainwad AM. ‘An overview of topic modeling methods and tools.’ 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS). Madurai, India and 15–16 June 2017. IEEE: Madurai, India. 2017.

[4] Greene D, O’Callaghan D, Cunningham P. How many topics? Stability analysis for topic models. In Calders T, Esposito F, Hüllermeier E, Meo R (eds.) Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. ECML PKDD 2014. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 498–513). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. 2014.

[5] Vayansky I, Kumar SAP. A review of topic modeling methods. Information Systems. 2020; 94: 101582.

[6] Shoaib M, Becker LB. A walk through the progression of resuscitation medicine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2022; 1507: 23–36.

[7] Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 98–114.

[8] Scapigliati A, Zace D, Matsuyama T, Pisapia L, Saviani M, Semeraro F, et al.; On Behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Education Implementation and Teams Task Force. Community initiatives to promote basic life support implementation—a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10: 5719.

[9] Dainty KN, Colquitt B, Bhanji F, Hunt EA, Jefkins T, Leary M, et al. Understanding the importance of the lay responder experience in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022; 145: e852–e867.

[10] Monrouxe LV, Bullock A, Gormley G, Kaufhold K, Kelly N, Roberts CE, et al. New graduate doctors’ preparedness for practice: a multistakeholder, multicentre narrative study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e023146.

[11] Popov V, Mateju N, Jeske C, Lewis KO. Metaverse-based simulation: a scoping review of charting medical education over the last two decades in the lens of the ‘marvelous medical education machine’. Annals of Medicine. 2024; 56: 2424450.

[12] García-Suárez M, Méndez-Martínez C, Martínez-Isasi S, Gómez-Salgado J, Fernández-García D. Basic life support training methods for health science students: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16: 768.

[13] González-Salvado V, Rodríguez-Ruiz E, Abelairas-Gómez C, Ruano-Raviña A, Peña-Gil C, González-Juanatey JR, et al. Training adult laypeople in basic life support. A systematic review. Revista EspañOla de Cardiología. 2020; 73: 53–68.

[14] Au K, Lam D, Garg N, Chau A, Dzwonek A, Walker B, et al. Improving skills retention after advanced structured resuscitation training: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Resuscitation. 2019; 138: 284–296.

[15] Boet S, Waldolf R, Bould C, Lam S, Burns JK, Moffett S, et al. Early or late booster for basic life support skill for laypeople: a simulation-based randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022; 24: 408–418.

[16] Gugelmin-Almeida D, Tobase L, Maconochie I, Polastri T, Rodrigues Gesteira EC, Williams J. What can be learned from the literature about intervals and strategies for paediatric CPR retraining of healthcare professionals? A scoping review of literature. Resuscitation Plus. 2022; 12: 100319.

[17] Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: a review. Medicine. 2024; 103: e38813.

[18] Boustani M, Alder CA, Solid CA. Agile implementation: a blueprint for implementing evidence‐based healthcare solutions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018; 66: 1372–1376.

[19] Fijačko N, Masterson Creber R, Metličar Š, Strnad M, Greif R, Štiglic G, et al. Effects of a serious smartphone game on nursing students’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills in adult basic life support: randomized wait list-controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12: e56037.

[20] You KM, Shin J, Lee SJ, Lee HJ, Jung JH, Son YJ, et al. Video-enhanced follow-up training improves basic life support skills retention in laypersons: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022; 29: 373–381.

[21] Saidu A, Lee K, Ismail I, Arulogun O, Lim PY. Effectiveness of video self-instruction training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation retention of knowledge and skills among nurses in north-western Nigeria. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11: 1124270.

[22] Lauridsen KG, Løfgren B, Brogaard L, Paltved C, Hvidman L, Krogh K. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Simulation in Healthcare. 2022; 17: 170–182.

[23] Cimino J, Braun C. Clinical research in prehospital care: current and future challenges. Clinics and Practice. 2023; 13: 1266–1285.

[24] Berg KM, Cheng A, Panchal AR, Topjian AA, Aziz K, Bhanji F, et al.; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support, Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Life Support, and Resuscitation Education Science Writing Groups. Part 7: systems of care: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020; 142: S580–S604.

[25] Checa D, Bustillo A. A review of immersive virtual reality serious games to enhance learning and training. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2020; 79: 5501–5527.

[26] Kovács E, Jenei ZM, Csordás K, Fritúz G, Hauser B, Gyarmathy VA, et al. The timing of testing influences skill retention after basic life support training: a prospective quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19: 452.

[27] Abelairas-Gómez C, Martinez-Isasi S, Barcala-Furelos R, Varela-Casal C, Carballo-Fazanes A, Pichel-López M, et al. Training frequency for educating schoolchildren in basic life support: very brief 4-month rolling-refreshers versus annual retraining—a 2-year prospective longitudinal trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e052478.

[28] Stanney KM, Archer J, Skinner A, Horner C, Hughes C, Brawand NP, et al. Performance gains from adaptive eXtended Reality training fueled by artificial intelligence. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation. 2022; 19: 195–218.

[29] Pretolesi D, Zechner O, Guirao DG, Schrom-Feiertag H, Tscheligi M. AI-Supported XR training: personalizing medical first responder training. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. 2024; 17: 343–356.

[30] Mahamuni CV. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): integrating Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and machine learning (ML)—a review. Recent Research Reviews Journal. 2024; 3: 70–87.