Article Data

  • Views 494
  • Dowloads 19

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Pain, functional independence, and psychological distress as determinants of health-related quality of life in post-acute recovery phase following extremity injury

  • Ming-Chin Lee1
  • Mulyadi Mulyadi2
  • Bih O Lee3,4,*,
  • Santo Imanuel Tonapa3,5

1Department of Plastic Surgery, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, 701002 Tainan, Taiwan

2School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Sam Ratulangi University, 95115 Manado, Indonesia

3College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, 807378 Kaohsiung, Taiwan

4Department of Nursing, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, 71703 Tainan, Taiwan

5School of Nursing, Galuh University, 46274 Ciamis, Indonesia

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.125 Vol.21,Issue 9,September 2025 pp.27-34

Submitted: 15 February 2025 Accepted: 27 April 2025

Published: 08 September 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Bih O Lee E-mail: Biholee@kmu.edu.tw

Abstract

Background: Extremity trauma is a leading cause of hospital admissions worldwide and significantly impacts post-acute recovery and quality of life. While acute trauma management is well-documented, the post-acute recovery phase remains understudied despite its critical role in long-term outcomes. Identifying determinants of quality of life during this period is essential for optimizing and guiding recovery strategies. This study aimed to investigate correlations between health-related quality of life and key determinants, including demographic characteristics, pain, functional independence and psychological distress, during the post-acute recovery phase following extremity injury. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 70 patients with extremity trauma and was conducted over a year at an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. Pain intensity, functional independence, psychological distress and health-related quality of life were assessed using the numeric pain rating scale, Barthel Index, brief symptom rating scale, and the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions questionnaire, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of quality of life. Results: Regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between poorer quality of life and higher pain intensity (β = 0.31, p < 0.001), greater psychological distress (β = 0.20, p = 0.008), older age (β = 0.27, p = 0.049) and injuries from vehicle accidents (β = 0.24, p = 0.016). Conversely, greater functional independence was significantly correlated with improved quality of life (β = −0.57, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study found significant correlations between health-related quality of life and factors such as pain intensity, psychological distress, functional independence, age and injury mechanism. These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive care strategies integrating effective pain management, psychological interventions and functional rehabilitation during the post-acute recovery period. Future longitudinal and multi-site studies are recommended to further examine causal relationships and enhance the generalizability of these findings.


Keywords

Extremity injury; Pain; Stress; Quality of life; Functional status; Regression analysis; Rehabilitation; Cross-sectional studies


Cite and Share

Ming-Chin Lee,Mulyadi Mulyadi,Bih O Lee,Santo Imanuel Tonapa. Pain, functional independence, and psychological distress as determinants of health-related quality of life in post-acute recovery phase following extremity injury. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(9);27-34.

References

[1] Franklin RC, Sleet DA. Injury prevention and health promotion: a global perspective. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2018; 29: 113–116.

[2] Momenyan S, Chan H, Erdelyi S, Pei LX, Shum LK, Jae L, et al. Health-related quality of life in the year following road trauma: longitudinal analysis using piecewise latent curve modeling. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024; 354: 509–518.

[3] American College of Surgeons. Trauma quality programs participant use file. 2016. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/quality/national-trauma-data-bank/reports-and-publications (Accessed: 11 March 2025).

[4] Verma V, Singh A, Singh GK, Kumar S, Sharma V, Kumar A, et al. Epidemiology of trauma victims admitted to a level 2 trauma center of North India. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2017; 7: 107–112.

[5] Verdonck P, Peters M, Stroobants T, Gillebeert J, Janssens E, Schnaubelt S, et al. Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: a retrospective analysis of 2016–2023. Injury. 2024; 55: 112022.

[6] Noorlander-Borgdorff MP, Kievit W, Giannakópoulos GF, Botman M, Tromp TN, Oflazoglu K, et al. The economic impact of open lower limb fractures in the Netherlands: a cost-of-illness study. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2024; 50: 2605–2613.

[7] Kejela S, Seyoum N. Acute pain management in the trauma patient population: are we doing enough? A prospective observational study. Journal of Trauma and Injury. 2022; 35: 151–158.

[8] Accardi-Ravid MC, Dyer JR, Sharar SR, Wiechman S, Jensen MP, Hoffman HG, et al. The nature of trauma pain and its association with catastrophizing and sleep. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2018; 25: 698–705.

[9] Meakes S, Enninghorst N, Weaver N, Hardy BM, Balogh ZJ. Long-term functional outcomes in polytrauma: a fundamentally new approach is needed in prediction. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2024; 50: 1439–1452.

[10] Mulyadi M, Harianto S, Tonapa SI, Lee BO. Early quality-of-life changes in mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2023; 30: 75–82.

[11] Renne A, Proaño-Zamudio JA, Pinkes N, Sanchez SE, Velmahos GC, Salim A, et al. Loss of independence after traumatic injury: a patient-centered study. Surgery. 2023; 174: 1021–1025.

[12] Brakenridge CL, Smits EJ, Gane EM, Andrews NE, Williams G, Johnston V. Effectiveness of interventions on work outcomes after road traffic crash-related musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2025; 35: 30–47.

[13] Selaković I, Mandić-Rajčević S, Milovanović A, Tomanović-Vujadinović S, Dimitrijević S, Aleksić M, et al. Pre-fracture functional status and early functional recovery are significant predictors of instrumental activities of daily living after hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation. 2024; 15: 21514593241255627.

[14] Mulyadi M, Sithichoksakulchai S, Gannika L, Sembiring EE. Early patients’ illness perception as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder and quality of life one month after mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Jurnal Ners. 2024; 19: 47–54.

[15] Tonapa SI, Liu Y, Mulyadi M, Lee BO. Changes in self-regulation and the predictors of quality of life 3 months after extremity injury: a prospective study. Clinical Nursing Research. 2023; 32: 518–526.

[16] Vardon-Bounes F, Gracia R, Abaziou T, Crognier L, Seguin T, Labaste F, et al. A study of patients’ quality of life more than 5 years after trauma: a prospective follow-up. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2021; 19: 18.

[17] Lotfalla A, Halm J, Schepers T, Giannakópoulos G. Health-related quality of life after severe trauma and available PROMS: an updated review (part I). European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2023; 49: 747–761.

[18] Sluys KP, Shults J, Richmond TS. Health-related quality of life and return to work after minor extremity injuries: a longitudinal study comparing upper versus lower extremity injuries. Injury. 2016; 47: 824–831.

[19] Llaquet Bayo H, Montmany S, Rebasa P, Secanella M, Alberich M, Navarro S. Analysis of quality of life after major trauma: a Spanish follow-up cohort study. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2019; 45: 289–297.

[20] Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2023 Cause of death statistics. 2022. Available at: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-7162-79789-2.html (Accessed: 26 February 2025).

[21] McEvoy NL, Tume LN, Trapani J. What are publication reporting checklists, and why are they so important? Nursing in Critical Care. 2022; 27: 291–293.

[22] Modarresi S, Lukacs MJ, Ghodrati M, Salim S, MacDermid JC, Walton DM, et al. A Systematic review and synthesis of psychometric properties of the numeric pain rating scale and the visual analog scale for use in people with neck pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 2022; 38: 132–148.

[23] Wang YC, Chang PF, Chen YM, Lee YC, Huang SL, Chen MH, et al. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2023; 45: 1097–1102.

[24] Chen HC, Wu CH, Lee YJ, Liao SC, Lee MB. Validity of the five-item Brief Symptom Rating Scale among subjects admitted for general health screening. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2005; 104: 824–829.

[25] Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. Methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. 1st edn. Springer: Cham (CH). 2020.

[26] Rosenbloom BN, Khan S, McCartney C, Katz J. Systematic review of persistent pain and psychological outcomes following traumatic musculoskeletal injury. Journal of pain Research. 2013; 6: 39–51.

[27] Herrera-Escobar JP, Apoj M, Weed C, Harlow AF, Al Rafai SS, Lilley E, et al. Association of pain after trauma with long-term functional and mental health outcomes. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2018; 85: 773–779.

[28] Pollack LR, Liao J, Powelson EB, Gause E, Robinson BRH, Vavilala MS, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life and independence among older survivors of serious injury. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2023; 94: 624–631.

[29] Ghneim MH, Stein DM. Age-related disparities in older adults in trauma. Surgery. 2024; 176: 1771–1773.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top