Article Data

  • Views 219
  • Dowloads 19

Original Research

Open Access

Evaluating sarcopenia in emergency department triage: implications for hospitalization and critical care

  • Li-Chin Chen1,2,3
  • Chip-Jin Ng3,4,5,6
  • Chin-Yen Han3,7
  • Cheng-Yu Chien3,4,5,6,8,†
  • Shu-Yu Kuo1,*,†,

1School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, 11031 Taipei, Taiwan

2Nursing Management Department, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou), Chang Gung Medical Foundation, 33305 Taoyuan, Taiwan

3Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, 33307 Taoyuan, Taiwan

4Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou), 33305 Taoyuan, Taiwan

5College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 33332 Taoyuan, Taiwan

6Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch, 10507 Taipei, Taiwan

7New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, 23652 New Taipei City, Taiwan

8Department of Emergency Medicine, Ton-Yen General Hospital, 30268 Zhubei, Taiwan

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.162

Submitted: 06 April 2025 Accepted: 21 May 2025

Online publish date: 28 October 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Shu-Yu Kuo E-mail: sykuo@tmu.edu.tw

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia, characterized by age-related declines in skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical performance, is common in older adults yet remains under-recognized in emergency medical settings. Despite its strong association with frailty and adverse clinical outcomes, sarcopenia is not routinely assessed in emergency department (ED) triage. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of possible sarcopenia among elderly adults presenting to the ED and evaluate its association with hospital admission and length of stay (LOS). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary urban ED in Taiwan between December 2020 and April 2021. Patients aged ≥65 years were consecutively enrolled and assessed for possible sarcopenia. Frailty was evaluated using the Edmonton Frail Scale and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary outcomes included ED disposition (hospital admission versus discharge) and unfavorable discharge outcomes. Secondary outcomes comprised hospital LOS and National Health Insurance (NHI) reimbursement points. Linear regression and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted, along with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of the 890 patients enrolled, 481 (54.0%) were sarcopenic and were significantly older, had lower body weight, and exhibited higher frailty scores (p < 0.001). Sarcopenia was associated with higher rates of hospital admission (p < 0.001) and prolonged LOS (p < 0.001). After adjustment, sarcopenia independently predicted hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.39; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.04–1.87) and extended LOS (aOR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.78–4.80). ROC analysis demonstrated moderate predictive capability (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.706). Additionally, NHI reimbursement points and unfavorable discharge outcomes were significantly associated with sarcopenia. Conclusions: Sarcopenia is both prevalent and independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes among elderly adults in the ED. Incorporating sarcopenia assessment into triage protocols may improve early risk stratification and support more informed clinical decision-making in this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04862936.


Keywords

Sarcopenia; Emergency department; Frailty; Hospital admission; Intensive care unit


Cite and Share

Li-Chin Chen,Chip-Jin Ng,Chin-Yen Han,Cheng-Yu Chien,Shu-Yu Kuo. Evaluating sarcopenia in emergency department triage: implications for hospitalization and critical care. Signa Vitae. 2025.doi:10.22514/sv.2025.162.

References

[1] Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. The Lancet. 2019; 393: 2636–2646.

[2] Goktekin MC, Gul E, Aksu F. PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality. Signa Vitae. 2025; 21: 97–105.

[3] Chen L, Liu L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Bahyah KS, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian working group for Sarcopenia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2014; 15: 95–101.

[4] Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2001; 56: M146–M156.

[5] Chien CY, Chaou CH, Yeh CC, Hsu KH, Gao SY, Ng CJ. Using mobility status as a frailty indicator to improve the accuracy of a computerized five-level triage system among older patients in the emergency department. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2022; 22: 86.

[6] Kim DH, Rockwood K. Frailty in older adults. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2024; 391: 538–548.

[7] Ng YX, Cheng LJ, Quek YY, Yu R, Wu XV. The measurement properties and feasibility of FRAIL scale in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. 2024; 95: 102243.

[8] Sun Y, Witham MD, Clegg A, Taylor RS, Dibben G, McAllister D, et al. A scoping review of the measurement and analysis of frailty in randomised controlled trials. Age and Ageing. 2024; 53: afae258.

[9] Ng C, Chien L, Huang C, Chaou C, Gao S, Chiu SY, et al. Integrating the clinical frailty scale with emergency department triage systems for elder patients: a prospective study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2023; 66: 16–21.

[10] Rueegg M, Nissen SK, Brabrand M, Kaeppeli T, Dreher T, Carpenter CR, et al. The clinical frailty scale predicts 1‐year mortality in emergency department patients aged 65 years and older. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 29: 572–580.

[11] Blomaard LC, Speksnijder C, Lucke JA, de Gelder J, Anten S, Schuit SCE, et al. Geriatric screening, triage urgency, and 30‐day mortality in older emergency department patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2020; 68: 1755–1762.

[12] Elliott A, Taub N, Banerjee J, Aijaz F, Jones W, Teece L, et al. Does the clinical frailty scale at triage predict outcomes from emergency care for older people? Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 77: 620–627.

[13] de Gelder J, Lucke JA, Blomaard LC, Booijen AM, Fogteloo AJ, Anten S, et al. Optimization of the APOP screener to predict functional decline or mortality in older emergency department patients: cross-validation in four prospective cohorts. Experimental Gerontology. 2018; 110: 253–259.

[14] Daly RM, Iuliano S, Fyfe JJ, Scott D, Kirk B, Thompson MQ, et al. Screening, diagnosis and management of sarcopenia and frailty in hospitalized older adults: recommendations from the Australian and New Zealand Society for Sarcopenia and Frailty Research (ANZSSFR) Expert Working Group. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2022; 26: 637–651.

[15] Gentili S, Emberti Gialloreti L, Riccardi F, Scarcella P, Liotta G. Predictors of emergency room access and not urgent emergency room access by the frail older adults. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021; 9: 721634.

[16] Beaudart C, Tilquin N, Abramowicz P, Baptista F, Peng DJ, de Souza Orlandi F, et al. Quality of life in sarcopenia measured with the SarQoL questionnaire: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Maturitas. 2024; 180: 107902.

[17] Memedovich A, Asante B, Khan M, Eze N, Holroyd BR, Lang E, et al. Strategies for improving ED-related outcomes of older adults who seek care in emergency departments: a systematic review. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2024; 17: 16.

[18] France J, Lalonde M, McIsaac DI, Squires JE, Backman C. Facilitators and barriers to nurses screening for frailty in acute care in a provincial health-care system: a survey study guided by the theoretical domains framework. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2023; 26: 266–275.

[19] Lee H, Lee E, Jang IY. Frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2020; 35: e16.

[20] Brousseau AA, Dent E, Hubbard R, Melady D, Émond M, Mercier É, et al.; Multinational Emergency Department Study. Identification of older adults with frailty in the emergency department using a frailty index: results from a multinational study. Age and Ageing. 2018; 47: 242–248.

[21] Chong E, Bao M, Goh EF, Lim WS. SARC-F at the emergency department: diagnostic performance for frailty and predictive performance for reattendances and acute hospitalizations. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2021; 25: 1084–1089.

[22] Elliott A, Phelps K, Regen E, Conroy SP. Identifying frailty in the emergency department-feasibility study. Age and Ageing. 2017; 46: 840–845.

[23] Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2020; 21: 300–307.e2.

[24] Kawakami R, Miyachi M, Sawada SS, Torii S, Midorikawa T, Tanisawa K, et al. Cut-offs for calf circumference as a screening tool for low muscle mass: WASEDA’S Health Study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International. 2020; 20: 943–950.

[25] Su YC, Chien CY, Chaou CH, Hsu KH, Gao SY, Ng CJ. Revising vital signs criteria for accurate triage of older adults in the emergency department. International Journal of General Medicine. 2022; 15: 6227–6235.

[26] Yang ZC, Lin H, Jiang GH, Chu YH, Gao JH, Tong ZJ, et al. Frailty is a risk factor for falls in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2023; 27: 487–495.

[27] Picca A, Calvani R, Coelho-Junior HJ, Marzetti E. Cell death and inflammation: the role of mitochondria in health and disease. Cells. 2021; 10: 537.

[28] Luo C, Liu RY, Zhang GW, Hu F, Jin YH, Liu BY. Possible sarcopenia and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults in China: a 7-year longitudinal cohort study. BMC Geriatrics. 2023; 23: 404.

[29] Beaudart C, Drost RMWA, Evers SMAA, Paulus ATG, Hiligsmann M. Associations between muscle mass/strength and healthcare costs/use for patients with cancer: a systematic literature review. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications. 2022; 33: 100633.

[30] Sousa AS, Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Amaral TF. Sarcopenia and length of hospital stay. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016; 70: 595–601.

[31] Inciong JFB, Chaudhary A, Hsu HS, Joshi R, Seo JM, Trung LV, et al. Economic burden of hospital malnutrition: a cost-of-illness model. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2022; 48: 342–350.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top