Article Data

  • Views 253
  • Dowloads 19

Systematic Reviews

Open Access

Antifibrotic therapy in patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Nora Di Tomasso1
  • Valentina Ajello2
  • Gianluca Paternoster3
  • Daniele Orso4
  • Carolina Soledad Romero Garcia5
  • Laura Pasin6
  • Filippo D’Amico7,*,
  • Luigi Beretta1,7
  • Alberto Zangrillo1,7
  • Giacomo Monti1,7
  • PIONEER study group

1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy

2Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy

3Cardiovascular Anesthesia and ICU, San Calo Hospital, 85100 Potenza, Italy

4Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

5Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain

6Department of Urgency and Emergency, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy

7School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.163

Submitted: 07 May 2025 Accepted: 26 June 2025

Online publish date: 28 October 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Filippo D’Amico E-mail: damico.filippo@hsr.it

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive and often irreversible condition that can develop following acute lung injury (ALI), particularly in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Antifibrotic agents such as pirfenidone and nintedanib slow fibrosis progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but their role in post-ALI fibrosis remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of antifibrotic therapy on mortality and secondary outcomes in patients with ALI. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane up to 17 March 2025 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing antifibrotic therapy to standard care in patients with ALI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and radiological and functional findings. Results: We identified six studies (two randomized, two propensity matched and two case control studies) for a total of 697 COVID-19 patients and no study performed on non-COVID-19 patients. Antifibrotic therapy was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to the control group (16.1% vs. 23.9%, OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.93, p = 0.02, I2 = 40%). The number needed to treat to prevent one death was 13. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between the antifibrotic and control groups. Individual studies reported improvements in computed tomography severity scores and pulmonary function parameters in the antifibrotic group. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that antifibrotic therapy might reduce mortality in patients with ALI. Improvements in radiological and functional outcomes indicate a potential role for antifibrotic agents in modifying disease progression. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these results and determine the optimal use of antifibrotic therapy in post-ALI fibrosis. The PROSPERO Registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD420251001885).


Keywords

Antifibrotics; Pirfenidone; Nintedanib; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Acute lung injury; Intensive care unit


Cite and Share

Nora Di Tomasso,Valentina Ajello,Gianluca Paternoster,Daniele Orso,Carolina Soledad Romero Garcia,Laura Pasin,Filippo D’Amico,Luigi Beretta,Alberto Zangrillo,Giacomo Monti,PIONEER study group. Antifibrotic therapy in patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Signa Vitae. 2025.doi:10.22514/sv.2025.163.

References

[1] Deng Z, Fear MW, Suk Choi Y, Wood FM, Allahham A, Mutsaers SE, et al. The extracellular matrix and mechanotransduction in pulmonary fibrosis. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2020; 126: 105802.

[2] Amati F, Stainer A, Polelli V, Mantero M, Gramegna A, Blasi F, et al. Efficacy of pirfenidone and nintedanib in interstitial lung diseases other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 7849.

[3] Babariya H, Gaidhane SA, Acharya S, Kumar S. Pirfenidone as a cornerstone in the management of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases and its emerging applications: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2024; 16: e70497.

[4] Inomata M, Nishioka Y, Azuma A. Nintedanib: evidence for its therapeutic potential in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Core Evidence. 2015; 10: 89–98.

[5] Wang J, Li K, Hao D, Li X, Zhu Y, Yu H, et al. Pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. MedComm. 2024; 5: e744.

[6] Sturgill JL, Mayer KP, Kalema AG, Dave K, Mora S, Kalantar A, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome and pulmonary fibrosis in patients surviving ARDS-pneumonia of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 etiologies. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 6554.

[7] Burnham EL, Janssen WJ, Riches DW, Moss M, Downey GP. The fibroproliferative response in acute respiratory distress syndrome: mechanisms and clinical significance. European Respiratory Journal. 2014; 43: 276–285.

[8] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.

[9] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009; 151: 264–269, W64.

[10] Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014; 14: 135.

[11] Pereira TV, Patsopoulos NA, Salanti G, Ioannidis JP. Critical interpretation of Cochran’s Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010; 1: 149–161.

[12] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. The BMJ. 2003; 327: 557–560.

[13] Higgins JP, Douglas GA. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JP, Green S (eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 187–243). 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken. 2019.

[14] Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. The BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898.

[15] Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919.

[16] Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al.; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The BMJ. 2004; 328: 1490.

[17] Boshra MS, Abou Warda AE, Sayed MA, Elkomy MH, Alotaibi NH, Mohsen M, et al. Effect of pirfenidone on risk of pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 patients experiencing cytokine storm. Healthcare. 2022; 10: 2387.

[18] Zhang F, Wei Y, He L, Zhang H, Hu Q, Yue H, et al. A trial of pirfenidone in hospitalized adult patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019. Chinese Medical Journal. 2021; 135: 368–370.

[19] Saiphoklang N, Patanayindee P, Ruchiwit P. The effect of nintedanib in post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis: an observational study. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2022; 2022: 9972846.

[20] Wang HY, Tsai SC, Lin YC, Hou JU, Chao CH. The effect of antifibrotic agents on acute respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study from TriNetX US collaborative networks. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2024; 24: 160.

[21] Acat M, Yildiz Gulhan P, Oner S, Turan MK. Comparison of pirfenidone and corticosteroid treatments at the COVID-19 pneumonia with the guide of artificial intelligence supported thoracic computed tomography. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021; 75: e14961.

[22] Singh P, Behera D, Gupta S, Deep A, Priyadarshini S, Padhan P. Nintedanib vs. pirfenidone in the management of COVID-19 lung fibrosis: a single-centre study. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2022; 52: 100–104.

[23] Kou M, Jiao Y, Li Z, Wei B, Li Y, Cai Y, et al. Real-world safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2024; 80: 1445–1460.

[24] Lv Q, Wang J, Xu C, Huang X, Ruan Z, Dai Y. Pirfenidone alleviates pulmonary fibrosis in vitro and in vivo through regulating Wnt/GSK-3β/β-catenin and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathways. Molecular Medicine. 2020; 26: 49.

[25] Ying H, Fang M, Hang QQ, Chen Y, Qian X, Chen M. Pirfenidone modulates macrophage polarization and ameliorates radiation-induced lung fibrosis by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2021; 25: 8662–8675.

[26] Da X, Li Z, Huang X, He Z, Yu Y, Tian T, et al. AGGF1 therapy inhibits thoracic aortic aneurysms by enhancing integrin α7-mediated inhibition of TGF-β1 maturation and ERK1/2 signaling. Nature Communications. 2023; 14: 2265.

[27] Acharya N, Sharma SK, Mishra D, Dhooria S, Dhir V, Jain S. Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease—a randomised controlled trial. Rheumatology International. 2020; 40: 703–710.

[28] Wei Q, Kong N, Liu X, Tian R, Jiao M, Li Y, et al. Pirfenidone attenuates synovial fibrosis and postpones the progression of osteoarthritis by anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2021; 19: 157.

[29] Seifirad S. Pirfenidone: a novel hypothetical treatment for COVID-19. Medical Hypotheses. 2020; 144: 110005.

[30] Liang Y, Yan Y, Liu N, Wang J, Fang C. Shengxian decoction improves lung function in rats with bleomycin-induced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis through the inhibition of PANoptosis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2024; 329: 118153.

[31] Shi SY, Zhao LW, Liu CB, Xiao HM, Jiang ZJ. Pirfenidone promotes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells by suppressing Hedgehog/GLI1 signaling. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology. 2025; 398: 5915–5925.

[32] Ichikado K, Kawamura K, Johkoh T, Fujimoto K, Shintani A, Hashimoto S, et al. Clinical phenotypes from fatal cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 20051.

[33] Michalski JE, Kurche JS, Schwartz DA. From ARDS to pulmonary fibrosis: the next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic? Translational Research. 2022; 241: 13–24.

[34] Torre A, Martínez-Sánchez FD, Narvaez-Chávez SM, Herrera-Islas MA, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Córdova-Gallardo J. Pirfenidone use in fibrotic diseases: what do we know so far? Immunity, Inflammation and Disease. 2024; 12: e1335.

[35] Liu G, Dong BB, Devanarayana S, Chen RC, Liu Q. Emerging roles of mechanosensitive ion channels in ventilator induced lung injury: a systematic review. Frontiers in Immunology. 2024; 15: 1479230.

[36] Zangrillo A, Belletti A, Palumbo D, Calvi MR, Guzzo F, Fominskiy EV, et al. One-year multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2022; 36: 1354–1363.

[37] Tresoldi M, Zangrillo A, Belletti A, Ramirez GA, Bozzolo E, Guzzo F, et al. Two-year multidisciplinary follow-up of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive and noninvasive respiratory support. Minerva Medica. 2023; 114: 773–784.

[38] D’Amico F, Marmiere M, Fonti M, Battaglia M, Belletti A. Association does not mean causation, when observational data were misinterpreted as causal: the observational interpretation fallacy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2025; 31: e14288.

[39] Monti G, Marzaroli M, Tucciariello MT, Ferrara B, Meroi F, Nakhnoukh C, et al. Pirfenidone to prevent fibrosis in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the PIONEER study protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2025; 153: 107883.

[40] D’Amico F, Marmiere M, Monti G, Landoni G. Protective hemodynamics: C.L.E.A.R.! Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2025; 39: 13–19.

[41] D’Amico F, Landoni G. Protective hemodynamics: a novel strategy to manage blood pressure. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2024; 30: 629–636.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top