Electrocardiographic findings and risk factors for mortality in octogenarians with pulmonary thromboembolism

Background: This study aimed to investigate the electrocardiographic risk factors associated with mortality in elderly patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed electrocardiograms (ECGs) of patients aged 80 years and older at the time of their initial PTE diagnosis. Additionally, patient outcomes were assessed to determine whether death occurred due to PTE or related complications within a follow-up period of 180 days. The relationship between electrocardiographic findings and 30-day and 180-day mortality was examined. Results: A total of 241 patients were included, with a mean age of 83.5 ± 2.6 years; 143 (59.3%) were female. The most common electrocardiographic abnormality was sinus tachycardia, observed in 73.4% of patients. Mortality was recorded in 64 patients (26.5%) within 30 days and 88 patients (36.5%) within 180 days. The strongest predictor of 30-day mortality was ST segment (ST) depression in leads V4–6 (odds ratio (OR) 14.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1–41.0), while the most significant predictor of 180-day mortality was ST elevation in leads V1, augmented Vector Right (aVR) lead, or III (OR 15.8; 95% CI: 6.6–37.7). Conclusions: Pulmonary thromboembolism in octogenarians is associated with high mortality. Electrocardiographic evaluation at the time of diagnosis is crucial, as specific ECG abnormalities may serve as important prognostic indicators for 30-day and 180-day mortality.

Electrocardiography; Pulmonary thromboembolism; Geriatrics; Mortality; Octogenarians

[1] Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. The task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Respiratory Journal. 2019; 54: 1901647.

[2] Robert-Ebadi H, Righini M. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism in the elderly. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2014; 25: 343–349.

[3] Hepburn-Brown M, Darvall J, Hammerschlag G. Acute pulmonary embolism: a concise review of diagnosis and management. Internal Medicine Journal. 2019; 49: 15–27.

[4] Bolt L, Lauber S, Limacher A, Samim D, Löwe A, Tritschler T, et al. Prognostic value of electrocardiography in elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism. The American Journal of Medicine. 2019; 132: e835–e843.

[5] Zuin M, Nohria A, Henkin S, Krishnathasan D, Sato A, Piazza G. Pulmonary embolism-related mortality in patients with cancer. JAMA Network. 2025; 8: e2460315.

[6] Hendriks PM, Kauling RM, Geenen LW, Eindhoven JA, Roos-Hesselink JW, Boomars KA, et al. Role of the electrocardiogram in the risk stratification of pulmonary hypertension. Heart. 2023; 109: 208–215.

[7] Geibel A, Zehender M, Kasper W, Olschewski M, Klima C, Konstantinides SV. Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism. European Respiratory Journal. 2005; 25: 843–848.

[8] Kucher N, Walpoth N, Wustmann K, Noveanu M, Gertsch M. QR in V1—an ECG sign associated with right ventricular strain and adverse clinical outcome in pulmonary embolism. European Heart Journal. 2003; 24: 1113–1119.

[9] Stein PD, Matta F, Sabra MJ, Treadaway B, Vijapura C, Warren R, et al. Relation of electrocardiographic changes in pulmonary embolism to right ventricular enlargement. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2013; 112: 1958–1961.

[10] Kukla P, McIntyre WF, Fijorek K, Mirek-Bryniarska E, Bryniarski L, Krupa E, et al. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with acute pulmonary embolism complicated by cardiogenic shock. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 32: 507–510.

[11] Toosi MS, Merlino JD, Leeper KV. Electrocardiographic score and short-term outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2007; 100: 1172–1176.

[12] Borkowski P, Singh N, Borkowska N, Mangeshkar S, Nazarenko N. Integrating cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiogram in pulmonary embolism prognosis. Cureus. 2024; 16: e53505.

[13] Camaro C, Aarts GWA, Adang EMM, van Hout R, Brok G, Hoare A, et al. Rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome by a single, pre-hospital troponin measurement: a randomized trial. European Heart Journal. 2023; 44: 1705–1714.

[14] Liu D, Duan B, Zhao M, Wu L, Cao Y, Liu N, et al. ST-segment alterations in the electrocardiogram of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a rabbit model. Physiological Research. 2024; 73: 543–552.

[15] Ma J, Li C, Zhai Z, Zhen Y, Wang D, Liu M, et al. Distribution of thrombus predicts severe reperfusion pulmonary edema after pulmonary endarterectomy. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2023; 46: 3766–3772.

[16] B Baranga L, Khanuja S, Scott JA, Provancha I, Gosselin M, Walsh J, et al. In situ pulmonary arterial thrombosis: literature review and clinical significance of a distinct entity. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2023; 221: 57–68.

[17] Boey E, Teo SG, Poh KK. Electrocardiographic findings in pulmonary embolism. Singapore Medical Journal. 2015; 56: 533–537.

[18] Co I, Eilbert W, Chiganos T. New electrocardiographic changes in patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 52: 280–285.

[19] Zheng XB, Wu HY, Zhang M, Yao BQ. Clinical significance of R-wave amplitude in lead V1 and inferobasal myocardial infarction in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2024; 29: e13114.

[20] Zuin M, Rigatelli G, Bilato C, Bongarzoni A, Casazza F, Zonzin P, et al. Prognostic role of serial electrocardiographic changes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Data from the Italian Pulmonary Embolism Registry. Thrombosis Research. 2022; 217: 15–21.

[21] Weekes AJ, Raper JD, Thomas AM, Lupez K, Cox CA, Esener D, et al. Electrocardiographic findings associated with early clinical deterioration in acute pulmonary embolism. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022; 29: 1185–1196.

[22] Nilsson LT, Andersson T, Carlberg B, Johansson LÅ, Söderberg S. Electrocardiographic abnormalities and NT-proBNP levels at long-term follow-up of patients with dyspnea after pulmonary embolism. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2024; 58: 2373090.

[23] Kaczyńska A, Bochowicz A, Kostrubiec M, Szulc M, Pruszczyk P. Electrocardiography and prediction of myocardial damage in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004; 112: 1039–1046. (In Polish)

[24] Janata K, Höchtl T, Wenzel C, Jarai R, Fellner B, Geppert A, et al. The role of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in the risk assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2012; 101: 329–337.

[25] Savelloni G, Gatto MC, Cancelli F, Barbetti A, Cogliati Dezza F, Franchi C, et al. Prognostic value of 12-leads electrocardiogram at emergency department in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-19. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 2537.