A modified risk model for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: comparative evaluation of the H3B2A1 score

Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a critical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Risk stratification is essential for the early identification of high-risk patients, guiding clinical decisions, and optimizing resource allocation. The H3B2A1 score is a modified version of the H3B2 score that incorporates albumin as an additional parameter. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the H3B2A1 score in comparison to established risk models, including AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), and modified GBS (mGBS), in assessing mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in UGIB patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, 233 patients with UGIB confirmed by endoscopic evaluation at a tertiary care center were included. The predictive accuracy of the H3B2A1 score for mortality and ICU admission was assessed and compared with AIMS65, GBS, mGBS, and H3B2 scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC), cutoff values, sensitivity and specificity for each scoring system. Results: The H3B2A1 score demonstrated comparable accuracy in predicting mortality (AUC: 0.750, sensitivity 88%) to the AIMS65 score (AUC: 0.754, sensitivity 88%), with both scores exhibiting moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.70–0.90). In predicting ICU admission, the AIMS65 score had the highest predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.844, sensitivity 96.1%), followed by H3B2A1 (AUC: 0.645; sensitivity 64.7%) and H3B2 (AUC: 0.624; sensitivity 82.4%). Incorporating albumin in the H3B2A1 score improved its prognostic performance compared to the original H3B2 model. Conclusions: The H3B2A1 score is a practical and effective tool for risk stratification in UGIB patients, demonstrating moderate predictive ability for mortality and ICU admission. Its simplicity and clinical applicability make it valuable to existing risk assessment models. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate its utility in diverse patient populations.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Mortality; ICU admission; Prognostic scoring

[1] Bae SJ, Kim K, Yun SJ, Lee SH. Predictive performance of blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio in elderly patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 41: 152–157.

[2] Lee YJ, Min BR, Kim ES, Park KS, Cho KB, Jang BK, et al. Predictive mortality factors within 30 days in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2016; 31: 54–64.

[3] Sasaki Y, Abe T, Kawamura N, Keitoku T, Shibata I, Ohno S, et al. Prediction of emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a new score model: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterology. 2022; 22: 337.

[4] Cazacu SM, Alexandru DO, Statie RC, Iordache S, Ungureanu BS, Iovănescu VF, et al. The accuracy of pre-endoscopic scores for mortality prediction in patients with upper GI bleeding and no endoscopy performed. Diagnostics. 2023; 13: 1188.

[5] Palmer JO, Stanley AJ. A review of risk scores within upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 3678.

[6] Wasserman RD, Abel W, Monkemuller K, Yeaton P, Kesar V, Kesar V. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and its endoscopic management. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2024; 35: 599–608.

[7] Menichelli D, Gazzaniga G, Del Sole F, Pani A, Pignatelli P, Pastori D. Acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding management in older people taking or not taking anticoagulants: a literature review. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024; 11: 1399429.

[8] Hearnshaw SA, Logan RFA, Lowe D, Travis SPL, Murphy MF, Palmer KR. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 2011; 60: 1327–1335.

[9] Lee HA, Jung H, Kim TO, Byeon J, Jeong E, Cho H, et al. Clinical outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to the risk indicated by Glasgow-Blatchford risk score-computed tomography score in the emergency room. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2022; 37: 1176–1185.

[10] Kocaoğlu S, Çetinkaya HB. Use of age shock index in determining severity of illness in patients presenting to the emergency department with gastrointestinal bleeding. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 47: 274–278.

[11] Rivieri S, Carron PN, Schoepfer A, Ageron FX. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022; 30: 32–39.

[12] Kherad O, Restellini S, Almadi M, Martel M, Barkun AN. Comparative evaluation of the ABC score to other risk stratification scales in managing high-risk patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2023; 57: 479–485.

[13] Rao VL, Gupta N, Swei E, Wagner T, Aronsohn A, Reddy KG, et al. Predictors of mortality and endoscopic intervention in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit. Gastroenterology Report. 2020; 8: 299–305.

[14] Jeon SW, Kwon JG, Lee JY, Lee SH, Lee HJ; Daegu-Gyeongbuk Gastrointestinal Study Group (DGSG). The time of endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an observational study. The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research. 2024; 24: 267–275.

[15] Li Y, Lu Q, Song M, Wu K, Ou X. Novel risk score for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients: a single-centre retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2023; 13: e072602.

[16] Vara-Luiz F, Mendes I, Palma C, Mascarenhas P, Simas D, Gomes P, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding differences between older and younger adults: should bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients be considered a geriatric syndrome? Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology. 2025; 18: 17562848251343416.

[17] Venkat A, Cattamanchi S, Madali A, Farook AR, Trichur RV. Comparison of the AIMS-65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in upper gastrointestinal bleed in the emergency department. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 16: 70–78.