Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Non-invasive respiratory support for postoperative acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a narrative review
1Department of Women, Child, General and Specialistic Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 801318 Napoli, Italy
2Department of Anesthesia and Cardiac Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, San Michele Hospital, 81024 Maddaloni, Italy
3AORN Santobono Pausillipon, 80122 Napoli, Italy
4AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy
5AORN dei Colli–Monaldi, 80131 Napoli, Italy
DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.186
Submitted: 16 July 2025 Accepted: 15 September 2025
Online publish date: 28 November 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Vincenzo Pota E-mail: vincenzo.pota@unicampania.it
Pulmonary complications after surgery continue to represent a significant postoperative challenge, accounting for considerable rates of morbidity and mortality. Among these, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is particularly critical, with mortality rates of up to 27%. In recent years, non-invasive respiratory strategies have been increasingly adopted to lower the risk of reintubation and reduce complications related to invasive ventilation. This narrative review examines the application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV)—namely Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP), and High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)—in the perioperative management of AHRF. We synthesized current evidence and guideline recommendations, with attention to patient selection criteria, preventive versus therapeutic use, and key outcomes, such as gas exchange, atelectasis, reintubation rates, morbidity, and mortality. CPAP and BiPAP may be advantageous in specific subsets of patients, such as those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cardiogenic pulmonary edema, while HFNC is increasingly favored for its comfort and ability to deliver consistent oxygenation. However, findings remain heterogeneous across surgical settings, and robust head-to-head trials are still lacking. Further studies are essential to refine patient stratification, optimize initiation timing, and determine the impact on long-term outcomes.
Hypoxia; Postoperative pulmonary complication; Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); BiPAP; High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
Francesco Coppolino,Pasquale Sansone,Gianluigi Cosenza,Leonardo Maria Bottazzo,Simona Brunetti,Sara De Sarno,Maurizio Del Prete,Maria Beatrice Passavanti,Marco Fiore,Clelia Esposito,Maria Caterina Pace,Vincenzo Pota. Non-invasive respiratory support for postoperative acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a narrative review. Signa Vitae. 2025.doi:10.22514/sv.2025.186.
[1] Lusquinhos J, Tavares M, Abelha F. Postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative strategies: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023; 15: e38786.
[2] Vetrugno L, Deana C, Colaianni-Alfonso N, Tritapepe F, Fierro C, Maggiore SM. Noninvasive respiratory support in the perioperative setting: a narrative review. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024; 11: 1364475.
[3] Croke L. Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. AORN Journal. 2022; 116: P7–P10.
[4] Komurcu O, Genc C, Kurt BC, Demir O, Akbaş A, Akyurt D, et al. Preoperative evaluation: impact on early perioperative hemodynamic and respiratory complications. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 435.
[5] Khoche S. Perioperative pulmonary hypertension. 2021. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/284983 (Accessed: 26 September 2022).
[6] Lamperti M, Romero CS, Guarracino F, Cammarota G, Vetrugno L, Tufegdzic B, et al. Preoperative assessment of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2025; 42: 1–35.
[7] Tegegne BA, Lema GF, Fentie DY, Bizuneh YB. Perioperative risk stratification and strategies for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications following major surgery in resource limited areas: a systematic review. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2021; 30: 100322.
[8] Junaidi B, Hawrylak A, Kaw R. Evaluation and management of perioperative pulmonary complications. Medical Clinics of North America. 2024; 108: 1087–1100.
[9] Coletta F, Mataro I, Sala C, Gentile D, Santoriello E, Petroccione C, et al. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critical burn patient during deep sedation in enzymatic bromelain debridement (nexobrid®): a single center brief report. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters. 2024; 37: 294–299.
[10] Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, Chatwin M, Ferrer M, Gregoretti C, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. European Respiratory Journal. 2022; 59: 2101574.
[11] Xiang GL, Wu QH, Xie L, Song JQ, Wu X, Hao SY, et al. High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in postoperative patients at high risk for pulmonary complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021; 75: e13828.
[12] Matthay MA, Thompson BT, Ware LB. The Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome: should patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen be included? The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2021; 9: 933–936.
[13] Grieco DL, Maggiore SM, Roca O, Spinelli E, Patel BK, Thille AW, et al. Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS. Intensive Care Medicine. 2021; 47: 851–866.
[14] Piraino T. Noninvasive respiratory support in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respiratory Care. 2019; 64: 638–646.
[15] Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, et al.; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Medicine. 2023; 49: 727–759.
[16] Pham T, Pesenti A, Bellani G, Rubenfeld G, Fan E, Bugedo G, et al. Outcome of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: insights from the LUNG SAFE Study. European Respiratory Journal. 2021; 57: 2003317.
[17] Diamond M, Peniston HL, Sanghavi DK, Mahapatra S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL). 2025.
[18] Al-Husinat L, Azzam S, Al Sharie S, Araydah M, Battaglini D, Abushehab S, et al. A narrative review on the future of ARDS: evolving definitions, pathophysiology, and tailored management. Critical Care. 2025; 29: 88.
[19] Esnault P, Cardinale M, Hraiech S, Goutorbe P, Baumstrack K, Prud’homme E, et al. High respiratory drive and excessive respiratory efforts predict relapse of respiratory failure in critically ill patients with COVID-19. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020; 202: 1173–1178.
[20] Tonelli R, Fantini R, Tabbì L, Castaniere I, Pisani L, Pellegrino MR, et al. Early inspiratory effort assessment by esophageal manometry predicts noninvasive ventilation outcome in de novo respiratory failure. A pilot study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020; 202: 558–567.
[21] Zheng X, Lu L, Ma M, Lei X. Effect of prophylactic noninvasive oxygen therapy after planned extubation on extubation failure in high-risk patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024; 11: 1481083.
[22] Zimnoch M, Eldeiry D, Aruleba O, Schwartz J, Avaricio M, Ishikawa O, et al. Non-invasive ventilation: when, where, how to start, and how to stop. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14: 5033.
[23] Ferreyro BL, Angriman F, Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Ferguson ND, Rochwerg B, et al. Association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with all-cause mortality in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020; 324: 57–67.
[24] Coppola S, Radovanovic D, Pozzi T, Danzo F, Rocco C, Lazzaroni G, et al. Non-invasive respiratory support in elderly hospitalized patients. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2024; 18: 789–804.
[25] Freeman H, Vranas KC, Tuthill S, Drake MG. High-flow nasal cannula liberation: who, when, and how? CHEST. 2025; 168: 1152–1161.
[26] Castellví-Font A, Goligher EC, Dianti J. Lung and diaphragm protection during mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2024; 45: 863–875.
[27] Ferrari S, Orlandi M, Avella M, Caldora P, Ferraro A, Ravazzolo G, et al. Effects of hydration on plasma concentrations of methotrexate in patients with osteosarcoma treated with high doses of methotrexate. Minerva Medica. 1992; 83: 289–293. (In Italian)
[28] Andrea L, Jog A, Moskowitz A. Spontaneous breathing trial techniques. JAMA. 2025; 333: 1361–1362.
[29] Marini JJ. Spontaneously regulated vs. controlled ventilation of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2011; 17: 24–29.
[30] Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 41: 536–545.
[31] Güldner A, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. Spontaneous breathing in mild and moderate versus severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2014; 20: 69–76.
[32] Chawla R, Dixit SB, Zirpe KG, Chaudhry D, Khilnani GC, Mehta Y, et al. ISCCM guidelines for the use of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure in adult ICUs. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2020; 24: S61–S81.
[33] Criner GJ, Gayen S, Zantah M, Dominguez Castillo E, Naranjo M, Lashari B, et al. Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation. European Respiratory Journal. 2024; 64: 2400396.
[34] Goret M, Pluchon K, Le Mao R, Badra A, Oilleau JF, Morvan Y, et al. Impact of noninvasive ventilation before and after cardiac surgery for preventing cardiac and pulmonary complications: a clinical randomized trial. CHEST. 2025; 167: 1727–1736.
[35] PRISM trial group. Postoperative continuous positive airway pressure to prevent pneumonia, re-intubation, and death after major abdominal surgery (PRISM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2021; 9: 1221–1230.
[36] Boscolo A, Pettenuzzo T, Sella N, Zatta M, Salvagno M, Tassone M, et al. Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. European Respiratory Review. 2023; 32: 220196.
[37] Osterkamp JTF, Strandby RB, Henningsen L, Marcussen KV, Thomsen T, Mortensen CR, et al. Comparing the effects of continuous positive airway pressure via mask or helmet interface on oxygenation and pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery: a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2023; 37: 63–70.
[38] David-João PG, Guedes MH, Réa-Neto Á, Chaiben VBO, Baena CP. Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Critical Care. 2019; 49: 84–91.
[39] Melton N, Lazar JF, Childers WK, Anderson D, Jaik NP, Loran DB, et al. Preventing respiratory failure after cardiac surgery using post-extubation bilevel positive airway pressure therapy. Cureus. 2019; 11: e4236.
[40] Ahmed SS, Yousuf MS, Samad K, Ullah H, Siddiqui KM. Factors influencing the use of postoperative bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Health Science Reports. 2022; 5: e873.
[41] Hamid M, Akhtar MI, Ahmed S. Immediate changes in hemodynamics and gas exchange after initiation of noninvasive ventilation in cardiac surgical patients. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2020; 23: 59–64.
[42] Li R, Liu L, Wei K, Zheng X, Zeng J, Chen Q. Effect of noninvasive respiratory support after extubation on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2023; 91: 111280.
[43] Jaber S, Pensier J, Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Seguin P, Ferrandiere M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation on reintubation in patients with obesity and hypoxemic respiratory failure following abdominal surgery: a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Medicine. 2024; 50: 1265–1274.
[44] Imperatore F, Gritti F, Esposito R, Giudice CD, Cafora C, Pennacchio F, et al. Non-invasive ventilation reduces postoperative respiratory failure in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis. Medicina. 2023; 59: 1457.
[45] Kokotovic D, Berkfors A, Gögenur I, Ekeloef S, Burcharth J. The effect of postoperative respiratory and mobilization interventions on postoperative complications following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2021; 47: 975–990.
[46] Frat JP, Grieco DL, De Jong A, Gibbs K, Carteaux G, Roca O, et al. Noninvasive respiratory supports in ICU. Intensive Care Medicine. 2025; 51: 1476–1489.
[47] Deana C, Vecchiato M, Bellocchio F, Tullio A, Martino A, Ziccarelli A, et al. High flow nasal oxygen vs. conventional oxygen therapy over respiratory oxygenation index after esophagectomy: an observational study. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2024; 16: 997–1008.
[48] Munroe ES, Prevalska I, Hyer M, Meurer WJ, Mosier JM, Tidswell MA, et al. High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation as initial treatment in acute hypoxia: a propensity score-matched study. Critical Care Explorations. 2024; 6: e1092.
[49] Xia M, Li W, Yao J, Jin Y, Du G, Xu Q, et al. A postoperative comparison of high-flow nasal cannula therapy and conventional oxygen therapy for esophageal cancer patients. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2021; 10: 2530–2539.
[50] Ge Y, Wang B, Liu J, Han R, Liu C. Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a retrospective propensity score study. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2025; 20: 1225–1233.
[51] Wang Y, Huang D, Ni Y, Liang Z. High-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy for postcardiothoracic surgery. Respiratory Care. 2020; 65: 1730–1737.
[52] Soliman HAZ, Fikry DM, El-Attar AM, El Hadidy MS. High flow nasal cannula effect on pulmonary complications after major elective upper abdominal surgeries: a randomized control study. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 38: 656–664.
[53] Wang Q, Peng Y, Xu S, Lin L, Chen L, Lin Y. The efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients at high risk of extubation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Medical Research. 2023; 28: 120.
[54] Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Godet T, Khoy-Ear L, Rozencwajg S, Delay JM, et al.; OPERA study investigators. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a French multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Medicine. 2016; 42: 1888–1898.
[55] Pota V, Coppolino F, Giaccari LG, Barbarisi M, Fiore M, Santagata M, et al. High-flow nasal cannula in weaning patients from mechanical ventilation in head and neck surgery: retrospective study. Life. 2025; 15: 1264.
[56] Chaudhuri D, Granton D, Wang DX, Burns KEA, Helviz Y, Einav S, et al. High-flow nasal cannula in the immediate postoperative period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CHEST. 2020; 158: 1934–1946.
[57] Liu K, Scott JB, Jing G, Li J. Management of postoperative hypoxemia. Respiratory Care. 2021; 66: 1136–1149.
[58] Liu Y, Xu C, Huang Y. Early clinical application and prediction of ROX index in patients with high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy. Chinese Critical Care Medicine. 2023; 35: 823–827. (In Chinese)
[59] Landoni G, Likhvantsev V, Kuzovlev A, Cabrini L. Perioperative noninvasive ventilation after adult or pediatric surgery: a comprehensive review. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2022; 36: 785–793.
[60] da Conceição dos Santos E, Monteiro RL, Fonseca Franco de Macedo JR, Poncin W, Lunardi AC. Prophylactic non-invasive positive pressure ventilation reduces complications and length of hospital stay after invasive thoracic procedures: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2024; 70: 265–274.
[61] Van de Voorde P, Turner NM, Djakow J, de Lucas N, Martinez-Mejias A, Biarent D, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: paediatric life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 327–387.
[62] Sammour I, Karnati S. Non-invasive respiratory support of the premature neonate: from physics to bench to practice. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020; 8: 214.
[63] Franklin D, Shellshear D, Babl FE, Schlapbach LJ, Oakley E, Borland ML, et al.; PARIS and PREDICT. Multicentre, randomised trial to investigate early nasal high-flow therapy in paediatric acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial—a Paediatric Acute respiratory Intervention Study (PARIS 2). BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e030516.
[64] Kıhtır HS, Akçay N, Şevketoğlu E. Pressure-regulated volume control and pressure-control ventilation modes in pediatric acute respiratory failure. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2022; 50: 18–23.
[65] Miura S, Yamaoka K, Miyata S, Butt W, Smith S. Clinical impact of implementing humidified high-flow nasal cannula on interhospital transport among children admitted to a PICU with respiratory distress: a cohort study. Critical Care. 2021; 25: 194.
[66] Lemyre B, Deguise MO, Benson P, Kirpalani H, De Paoli AG, Davis PG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023; 7: CD003212.
[67] Goel A, Kumar B, Negi S, Mahajan S, Puri GD, Khan WA. Comparative effect of high-frequency nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation on the work of breathing and postoperative pulmonary complication after pediatric congenital cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2024; 27: 43–50.
[68] Muller GJ, Hovenier R, Spijker J, van Gestel M, Klein-Blommert R, Markhorst D, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for pediatric hypoxic acute respiratory failure using a simple anesthetic mask with 3D printed adaptor: a case report. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021; 9: 710829.
[69] Nasef N, Rashed HM, Aly H. Practical aspects on the use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2020; 7: 19–25.
[70] Manley BJ, Cripps E, Dargaville PA. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. Seminars in Perinatology. 2024; 48: 151885.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.
Top