Article Data

  • Views 271
  • Dowloads 25

Reviews

Open Access

Unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a review

  • Hassan Shaaib1,*,

1Department of Anesthesia Technology, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, 31932 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.201

Submitted: 20 July 2025 Accepted: 16 October 2025

Online publish date: 24 December 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Hassan Shaaib E-mail: Hshuaaieb@psmchs.edu.sa

Abstract

Oesophageal intubation is dangerous if not promptly identified and managed. It often results from human error and inadequate education. An advanced technologies can mitigate the risk of this serious complication and enhance patient safety. This narrative review evaluated contemporary publications concerning unrecognised oesophageal intubation in the surgical theatre. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles published from 2010 to 2025, excluding non-English manuscripts, case reports, and studies lacking pertinent data. The effectiveness of capnography, video laryngoscopy, and simulation training was analysed to determine intubation rates across various clinical settings. The narrative review indicated that the rates of unrecognised oesophageal intubation range from 2.9% to 16.7%, and are associated with increased mortality. The implementation of video laryngoscopy reduced these rates by approximately 50%, while simulation training improved first-attempt intubation success. The findings underscore the necessity of incorporating advanced monitoring systems and simulation-based training into anaesthesia protocols to reduce the risks associated with overlooked oesophageal intubation. This fosters a safety-oriented culture and utilises technological innovations to significantly improve patient outcomes and decrease the incidence of this severe complication.


Keywords

Oesophageal intubation; Human factors; Monitoring; Patient safety; Simulation; Training


Cite and Share

Hassan Shaaib. Unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a review. Signa Vitae. 2025.doi:10.22514/sv.2025.201.

References

[1] Baker PA, O’Sullivan EP, Aziz MF. Unrecognised oesophageal intubation: time for action. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 129: 836–840.

[2] Kumar N, Kumar A, Dubey PK, Kumar S. Delayed detection of esophageal intubation: nasogastric tube was the cause? Saudi Critical Care Journal. 2018; 2: 27–28.

[3] Mann A, Higgs A, Cook TM. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2023; 29: 1–9.

[4] Sakles JC, Ross C, Kovacs G. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open. 2023; 4: e12951.

[5] Azad AK, Banik D, Hoque AF, Kader MA, Ray L, Hannan MA, et al. Predicting difficult intubation by using Modified Mallampati (MMT) with or without Thyromental Height Test (TMHT). Mymensingh Medical Journal. 2023; 32: 534–541.

[6] Yirga S, Samuel H, Markos Z, Yohannes W. Comparison of modified Mallampati test with and without phonation for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation among adult surgical patients: cross-sectional study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2025; 87: 85–92.

[7] Trambadia DN, Yadav P, A S. Preoperative assessment to predict difficult airway using multiple screening tests. Cureus. 2023; 15: e46868.

[8] Naithani U, Gupta G, Keerti K, Gupta M, Meena K, Sharma C, et al. Predicting difficult intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anaesthesia: a prospective study of 435 patients. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2013; 2: 2270–2286.

[9] Ellard L, Wong DT. Preoperative airway evaluation. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2020; 10: 19–27.

[10] Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, Baker PA, Cooper RM, Greif R, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies. Anaesthesia. 2022; 77: 1395–1415.

[11] Smith C, McNarry AF. Airway leads and airway response teams: improving delivery of safer airway management? Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2020; 10: 1–8.

[12] Jooste R, Roberts F, Mndolo S, Mabedi D, Chikumbanje S, Whitaker DK, et al. Global Capnography Project (GCAP): implementation of capnography in Malawi—an international anaesthesia quality improvement project. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74: 158–166.

[13] Wollner E, Nourian MM, Bertille K, Wake PB, Lipnick MS, Whitaker DK. Capnography—an essential monitor, everywhere: a narrative review. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2023; 137: 934–942.

[14] Endlich Y, Fox TP, Culwick MD, Acott C. Oesophageal intubations in anaesthetic practice across Australia and New Zealand: a webAIRS analysis of 109 incidents. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2024; 52: 302–313.

[15] Nichols M, Acker J, Bendall J, Asha S. Evaluating the incidence of unrecognised oesophageal intubation by paramedics. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2013; 5: 212–218.

[16] MK Al Harbi, Abdulmomen A, Al Qurashi F, Kattan M, Ahmad AE, Eldawlatly A. Airway management and COVID-19 patient—Saudi Anesthesia Society guidelines. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 14: 387–389.

[17] Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 129: 612–623.

[18] Al-Ghamdi S, Alfauri TM, Alharbi MA, Alsaihati MM, Alshaykh MM, Alharbi AA, et al. Current self-medication practices in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an observational study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2020; 37: 51.

[19] El-Boghdadly K, Pandit JJ. Combining anatomical, clinical, and physiological signs in confirming correct tracheal tube placement: the value in “seeing (the tube) is believing (in its position)”. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2025; 140: 276–279.

[20] Teixeira MT, Radosevich MA, Wanta BT, Wittwer ED. Video versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation of adults who are critically ill: what does the DEVICE trial mean for anesthesiologists? Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2023; 37: 2184–2187.

[21] León MA, Räsänen J, Mangar D. Neural network-based detection of esophageal intubation. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1994; 78: 548–553.

[22] Lederman D. ‘An artificial intelligence system for endotracheal intubation confirmation’, International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks. EANN 2021 Crete, Greece. Springer: Cham. 2021.

[23] Malo J, Hypes C, Natt B, Cristan E, Greenberg J, Morrissette K, et al. Airway registry and training curriculum improve intubation outcomes in the intensive care unit. Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care. 2018; 16: 212–223.

[24] Bidkar PU, Vinayagam S. Simulation-based airway training. In Ubaradka RS, Gupta N, Bidkar PU, Tripathy DK, Gupta A (eds.) The airway manual (pp. 783–791). 1st edn. Springer: Singapore. 2023.

[25] Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Fomina H, Khomenko O, Kyselova I, Frank M. Difficult airway simulation-based training for anaesthesiologists: efficacy and skills retention within six months. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 44.

[26] Nilsson PM, Russell L, Ringsted C, Hertz P, Konge L. Simulation-based training in flexible fibreoptic intubation. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2015; 32: 609–614.

[27] Zhang K, Zhong C, Lou Y, Fan Y, Zhen N, Huang T, et al. Video laryngoscopy may improve the intubation outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2025; 42: 334–342.

[28] Saul SA, Ward PA, McNarry AF. Airway management: the current role of videolaryngoscopy. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13: 1327.

[29] Li X, Huang X, Yang L, Jung S, Wang J, Zhao H. Implantable physical sensors for in vivo organ monitoring. Med-X Journal. 2025; 3: 1.

[30] Ahmad WAK, Suneel S, Nanthini L, Srivastava SS, Veerraju MS, Moharekar TT. ‘IoT based novel design of intelligent healthcare monitoring system with internet of things and smart sensors’, 2024 3Rd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC). Salem, India. 2024.

[31] Banoth S, Agrawal AR, Sharma GK, Sharma B, Kumar DA. Monitoring of patient health using IoT and machine learning based on vital signs. Nanotechnol Perceptions. 2024; 20: 3305–3312.

[32] Salgaonkar SV. Points to ponder for ‘Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation consensus guideline’. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2023; 67: S73–S74.

[33] Fu G, Xu L, Chen H, Lin J. State-of-the-art anesthesia practices: a comprehensive review on optimizing patient safety and recovery. BMC Surgery. 2025; 25: 32.

[34] Cook TM, Aziz MF. Has the time really come for universal videolaryngoscopy? British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 129: 474–477.

[35] Ansermino JM. ‘Can technology further improve the safety of anesthesia?’, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2008.

[36] Gadsden J. Monitoring for regional anesthesia. Essentials of Regional Anesthesia. 2012; 362: 21–36.

[37] Shetti AN, Goel S, Banerjee S, Nagaraj AH, Raveendran SH, Thakur A. Addressing anesthesia medication errors for improved quality care. Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2023; 10: 20–23.

[38] Psychological Safety in Anesthesiology. ASA Monitor. 2023; 87: 34.

[39] Nešković V. Patient safety in anesthesia: learning from mistakes? Serbian Journal of Anesthesia and Intensive Therapy. 2022; 44: 5–14.

[40] Pinto JM de AM, Veloso VT de F, Oliveira MD, Coelho LER, Junior JB, Silva BA e, et al. Patient safety in anesthesia administration: integrative review. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences. 2024; 6: 1509–1533. (In Portuguese)

[41] Myatra SN, Dhawan I, D’Souza SA, Elakkumanan LB, Jain D, Natarajan P. Recent advances in airway management. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2023; 67: 48–55.

[42] Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, López T, Abad-Gurumeta A, Casans-Francés R, et al. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part I. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación. 2024; 71: 171–206.

[43] Crosby ET. An evidence-based approach to airway management: is there a role for clinical practice guidelines? Anaesthesia. 2011; 66: 112–118.

[44] Edwards R. Lifelong learning, lifelong learning, lifelong learning. In Field J, Leicester M (eds.) Lifelong learning (pp. 3–11). 1st edn. Routledge: London. 2002.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top