Comparison of conventional versus channeled blade in tracheal intubation using video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background: During tracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy, manipulating the tracheal tube may be challenging because of misalignment between the camera’s visual axis and the curvature of the tube, which can hinder smooth tube advancement and potentially increase the risk of airway trauma. A channeled laryngoscope blade, which allows the tube to be preloaded and guided directly along the visual axis, may facilitate easier intubation and reduce soft tissue injury, thereby offering a potential advantage over conventional blades. This study compared the performance of channeled and conventional blades for tracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 140 adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery were randomly assigned to intubation with either a conventional blade (Group Co) or a channeled blade (Group Ch). The primary outcome was the intubation time, measured from the insertion of the laryngoscope to confirmation of successful tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included the initial intubation success rate and intubation-related complications, such as bleeding, sore throat, and hoarseness. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The median intubation time was longer in Group Ch (20.7 s) than in Group Co (19.5 s, p = 0.008). However, the initial success rate and the incidence of intubation-related complications were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: The channeled blade was associated with a slightly longer intubation time but demonstrated a similar success rate and safety profile compared to the conventional blade. Both blade types showed comparable clinical performance, suggesting that the choice between them may be guided by operator preference. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04948294, retrospectively registered.

Intubation; Video laryngoscopy; Channeled blade; Intubation time

[1] Saul SA, Ward PA, McNarry AF. Airway management: the current role of videolaryngoscopy. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13: 1327.

[2] Zhang K, Zhong C, Lou Y, Fan Y, Zhen N, Huang T, et al. Video laryngoscopy may improve the intubation outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2025; 42: 334–342.

[3] Shin KW, Lee SP, Kim T, Choi S, Kim YJ, Park HP, et al. Channelled versus nonchannelled Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades in patients with a cervical collar: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2024; 71: 1261–1271.

[4] Ruetzler K, Bustamante S, Schmidt MT, Almonacid-Cardenas F, Duncan A, Bauer A, et al.; Collaborative VLS Trial Group. Video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the operating room: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024; 331: 1279–1286.

[5] Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, Resnick-Ault D, Seitz KP, Russell DW, et al.; DEVICE Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Video versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation of critically ill adults. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2023; 389: 418–429.

[6] Dhoon TQ, Wilson L, Rajan GRC. Video laryngoscopy: a double-edged sword. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care. 2023; 27: 413–416.

[7] Seth R, Jindal S, Gupta D, Mitra S. Comparison of channelled with non-channelled blade of King Vision videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing emergency surgery: a randomised double blind study. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2024; 56: 101360.

[8] Bajpai S. A comparative study of intubation performance between channelled vs. non-channelled blade of king vision video laryngoscope in orotracheal intubation. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2021; 8: 732–736.

[9] Ramesh K, Srinivasan G, Bidkar PU. Comparison of tracheal intubation using king vision (non-channeled blade) and tuoren video laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization by manual in-line stabilization: a randomized clinical trial. Cureus. 2023; 15: e43471.

[10] Shukla A, Shanker R, Singh VK, Singh GP, Srivastava T. Non-channeled video laryngoscopy as an alternative to conventional laryngoscopy for intubating adult patients in the intensive care unit. Cureus. 2023; 15: e40716.

[11] Lee J, Cho Y, Kim W, Choi KS, Jang BH, Shin H, et al. Comparisons of videolaryngoscopes for intubation undergoing general anesthesia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12: 363.

[12] Lyons C, O’Sullivan EP. Videolaryngoscopy–theory and practice. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2019; 26–27: 38–41.

[13] Greenland KB. Two curves and three columns—a reappraisal of direct laryngoscopy. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2020; 31: 83–88.

[14] Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ, Challis VJ, Irwin MG, Sleigh JW. Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010; 105: 683–690.

[15] Shamim F, Sohaib M, Samad K, Khan MF, Manji AA, Latif A. Ease of Intubation with McGrath videolaryngoscope and incidence of adverse events during tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients: a prospective observational study. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2023; 9: 162–169.