Early management of out-of-hospital respiratory distress: an interdisciplinary consensus guidance

Background: Respiratory distress represents one of the most prevalent clinical presentations in out-of-hospital emergency medicine. Despite its frequency, optimal out-of-hospital management remains variable, and evidence-based guidance is lacking. Methods: An interdisciplinary panel of sixteen experts employed the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method to evaluate 56 statements on the assessment and treatment of out-of-hospital respiratory distress. These statements were developed through a scoping review of the literature and expert clinical judgment. Appropriateness ratings were performed over two rounds. Non-voting observers from patient associations participated in the discussions to represent the patient perspective. Results: The scoping review identified the available evidence on out-of-hospital respiratory distress and informed the development of 56 candidate statements subsequently evaluated by the panel. After the two-round RAND/UCLA consensus process, 27 statements (49%) were rated as appropriate, 13 (23%) as uncertain, and 16 (29%) as inappropriate. Oxygen therapy was rated appropriate both to improve symptoms (median 8, interquartile range (IQR) 8–9; disagreement index (DI) −0.20) and to prevent clinical deterioration (median 8, IQR 7.75–9; DI −0.20). Non-invasive ventilation received similarly high appropriateness ratings for improving symptoms (median 8, IQR 8–9; DI −0.34) and preventing deterioration (median 8.5, IQR 8–9; DI −0.34). The panel agreed on the need for early treatment, with oxygen therapy initiated within 10 minutes judged appropriate (median 8, IQR 8–9; DI −0.34). Advanced respiratory support was preferred over oxygen alone in moderate-to-severe respiratory distress (median 8, IQR 8–8.25; DI 0.00). Conclusions: This consensus provides practical, expert-driven recommendations to standardize early management of out-of-hospital respiratory distress. While many recommendations reached strong agreement, areas of uncertainty remain, underscoring the need for further clinical research.

Respiratory distress; Out-of-hospital management; Non-invasive ventilation; Emergency medical services; RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

[1] Zhou J, Nehme E, Dawson L, Bloom J, Nehme Z, Okyere D, et al. Epidemiology, outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients transported by ambulance for dyspnoea: a population-based cohort study. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2023; 35: 48–55.

[2] Pittet V, Burnand B, Yersin B, Carron PN. Trends of pre-hospital emergency medical services activity over 10 years: a population-based registry analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 2014; 14: 380.

[3] Kelly AM, Holdgate A, Keijzers G, Klim S, Graham CA, Craig S, et al.; AANZDEM Study Group. Epidemiology, prehospital care and outcomes of patients arriving by ambulance with dyspnoea: an observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2016; 24: 113.

[4] Del Pozo Vegas C, Sanz-García A, Dueñas-Ruiz A, de Santos Castro P, Gil Contreras A, Blanco González M, et al. Prehospital oxygen-therapy and mortality in patients treated by emergency medical services: a prospective, observational multicenter study. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025; 16: 357–366.

[5] Spörl P, Beckers SK, Rossaint R, Felzen M, Schröder H. Shedding light into the black box of out-of-hospital respiratory distress—a retrospective cohort analysis of discharge diagnoses, prehospital diagnostic accuracy, and predictors of mortality. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0271982.

[6] Balen F, Lamy S, Fraisse S, Trinari J, Bounes V, Dubucs X, et al. Predictive factors for early requirement of respiratory support through phone call to Emergency Medical Call Centre for dyspnoea: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2023; 30: 432–437.

[7] Bakke SA, Botker MT, Riddervold IS, Kirkegaard H, Christensen EF. Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation in prehospital treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review of controlled studies. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2014; 22: 69.

[8] Scquizzato T, Imbriaco G, Moro F, Losiggio R, Cabrini L, Consolo F, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in the prehospital emergency setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023; 27: 566–574.

[9] Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, Rab T, Tamis-Holland JE, Alexander JH, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2025; 151: e771–e862.

[10] Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al. Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s Target: stroke initiative. Stroke. 2011; 42: 2983–2989.

[11] Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lázaro P, et al. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. 2001. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html (Accessed: 29 January 2026).

[12] Monti G, Cabrini L, Kotani Y, Brusasco C, Kadralinova A, Giardina G, et al.; NAVIGATE Study Group. Early noninvasive ventilation in general wards for acute respiratory failure: an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2025; 134: 382–391.

[13] Glahn KPE, Bendixen D, Girard T, Hopkins PM, Johannsen S, Rüffert H, et al.; European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. Availability of dantrolene for the management of malignant hyperthermia crises: European Malignant Hyperthermia Group guidelines. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 125: 133–140.

[14] Rüffert H, Bastian B, Bendixen D, Girard T, Heiderich S, Hellblom A, et al.; European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. Consensus guidelines on perioperative management of malignant hyperthermia suspected or susceptible patients from the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 126: 120–130.

[15] Hodroge SS, Glenn M, Breyre A, Lee B, Aldridge NR, Sporer KA, et al. Adult patients with respiratory distress: current evidence-based recommendations for prehospital care. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020; 21: 849–857.

[16] Baugh CW, Neuenschwander JF, Lenox J, Hoh J, Ward K, Muramoto S, et al. Acute care of patients with moderate respiratory distress: recommendations from an American College of Emergency Physicians expert panel. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2025; 26: 1485–1494.

[17] Holland AE, Spathis A, Marsaa K, Bausewein C, Ahmadi Z, Burge AT, et al. European Respiratory Society clinical practice guideline on symptom management for adults with serious respiratory illness. European Respiratory Journal. 2024; 63: 2400335.

[18] Scquizzato T, D’Amico F, Rocchi M, Saracino M, Stella F, Landoni G, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest system-of-care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2022; 26: 30–41.

[19] Scquizzato T, Landoni G, Scandroglio AM, Franco A, Calabrò MG, Paoli A, et al. Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 28: 423–431.

[20] Regione Emilia Romagna. Emergency Medical Service (118): over 1,400 patients assisted per day (rapidly increasing), with an average response time of 15 minutes (4 minutes faster than the national average). 2025. Available at: https://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/notizie/2025/luglio/118-dati2024?utm (Accessed: 29 January 2026).