Article Data

  • Views 322
  • Dowloads 108

Meeting Abstracts

Open Access

Evidence based Interventional pain medicine techniques

  • Athanasia Tsaroucha1

11st Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Athens, Greece

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.195 Vol.17,Issue S1,September 2021 pp.52-52

Submitted: 26 August 2021 Accepted: 06 September 2021

Published: 15 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Athanasia Tsaroucha E-mail: ntsaroucha@yahoo.com

Abstract

Interventional pain management techniques have a definite place in the management of chronic pain. Inclusion of interventional pain management techniques in the patient’s treatment plan should be guided by the best available evidence on efficacy and safety with respect to the diagnosis.

Between 2009 and 2011 a series of 26 articles on evidence-based medicine for interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses were published but during the last years the high number of publications justified an update. These new data were published in Pain Practice on 2019.

For 28 different pain indications a total of 113 interventions were evaluated. Twenty-seven (24%) interventions were new compared to the previous guidelines and the recommendation changed for only 3 (2.6%) of the interventions.

The quality of evidence may seem rather low and the strength of the recommendations weak. However, this must be viewed in the context of guideline methodology. The fact that the quality of the evidence is rather low does not mean that the effect of the treatment is minimal; it indicates the need for clinical research. However, performing RCTs for (interventional) pain management techniques have many difficulties.

When the quality of the evidence is low, this does not mean that the intervention is not effective. And the quality of the evidence may be high, indicating that the intervention is not effective. When the recommendation is very low, there is a high need for more research.

The recommendations formulated in guidelines are valid for a specific patient population; however, they may not be valid for the individual patient with comorbidities.

The correct application of interventional pain management techniques requires an excellent knowledge of the neuroanatomy, experience in the interpretation of the images obtained during the procedure, and adequate training. Therefore, it is preferred that such interventions be performed in specialized centers.


Cite and Share

Athanasia Tsaroucha. Evidence based Interventional pain medicine techniques. Signa Vitae. 2021. 17(S1);52-52.

References

[1] Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force. Chest. 2006; 129: 174–181.

[2] van Kleef M, Mekhail N, van Zundert J. Evidence-based guidelines for interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses. Pain Practice : the Official Journal of World Institute of Pain. 2009; 9: 247–251.

[3] Huygen F, Kallewaard JW, Tulder M, Van Boxem K, Vissers K, Kleef M, et al. “Evidence‐Based Interventional Pain Medicine According to Clinical Diagnoses”: Update 2018. Pain Practice. 2019; 19: 664–675.

[4] Van Zundert J. Clinical research in interventional pain management techniques: the clinician's point of view. Pain Practice : the Official Journal of World Institute of Pain. 2007; 7: 221–229.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top