Article Data

  • Views 2702
  • Dowloads 231

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Is early surgical intervention effective for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury? A retrospective study secondary publication

  • Koji Yamamoto1
  • Akinori Okuda1,2,*,
  • Naoki Maegawa1,2
  • Hironobu Konishi1,2
  • Keita Miyazaki1
  • Yusuke Tada1
  • Yohei Kogeichi1
  • Keisuke Takano1
  • Hideki Asai1
  • Yasuyuki Kawai1
  • Yasuyuki Urisono1
  • Hideki Shigematsu2
  • Kenji Kawamura2
  • Hidetada Fukushima1
  • Yasuhito Tanaka2

1Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, 634-8522 Kashihara, Nara, Japan

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 634-8522 Kashihara, Nara, Japan

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.256 Vol.18,Issue 4,July 2022 pp.41-46

Submitted: 28 September 2021 Accepted: 23 November 2021

Published: 08 July 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Cord Injury)

*Corresponding Author(s): Akinori Okuda E-mail:


Although early surgery is known to be effective for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), whether it is equally effective in severe CSCI cases remains undetermined. This study aimed to determine whether surgery within 24 h improves the neurological prognosis and reduces the complications associated with surgery for traumatic severe CSCI. The data of 42 patients with traumatic severe CSCI with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A–B who underwent surgery between December 2007 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The participants were classified into early surgery (<24 h) and late surgery (>24 h) groups. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity score adjustment for confounding factors, the AIS grades before and 1 month following surgical treatment, which were considered the primary outcomes, were compared. The secondary outcomes were the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and occurrence of respiratory complications and cardiac arrest. In the early surgery group (n = 32, 76%), the average time to surgery was 10.25 h (4–23 h). The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis indicated significant differences in the neurological improvement according to the AIS grade at 1 month following surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.9–156.7, p = 0.012), the ICU-LOS >7 days (OR: 0.14, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.90, p = 0.04), and the occurrence of respiratory complications (OR: 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.01–0.73, p = 0.03) and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.13, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.85, p = 0.03). Early surgery (within 24 h) for traumatic severe CSCI may improve the neurological prognosis and prevent a long ICU-LOS and postoperative complications.


Cervical vertebrae; Spinal cord injury; Early surgery; Early intervention; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale; Retrospective studies

Cite and Share

Koji Yamamoto,Akinori Okuda,Naoki Maegawa,Hironobu Konishi,Keita Miyazaki,Yusuke Tada,Yohei Kogeichi,Keisuke Takano,Hideki Asai,Yasuyuki Kawai,Yasuyuki Urisono,Hideki Shigematsu,Kenji Kawamura,Hidetada Fukushima,Yasuhito Tanaka. Is early surgical intervention effective for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury? A retrospective study secondary publication. Signa Vitae. 2022. 18(4);41-46.


[1] Bourassa-Moreau E, Mac-Thiong J, Ehrmann Feldman D, Thompson C, Parent S. Complications in acute phase hospitalization of traumatic spinal cord injury: does surgical timing matter? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013; 74: 849–854.

[2] Croce MA, Bee TK, Pritchard E, Miller PR, Fabian TC. Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist? Annals of Surgery. 2001; 233: 851–858.

[3] Kerwin AJ, Griffen MM, Tepas JJ, Schinco MA, Devin T, Frykberg ER. Best practice determination of timing of spinal fracture fixation as defined by analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. The Journal of Trauma. 2008; 65: 824–830.

[4] Berlly M, Shem K. Respiratory Management during the first Five Days after Spinal Cord Injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2007; 30: 309–318.

[5] Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP, Dante SJ, Cotler JM, Balderston RA, et al. Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine. 1997; 22: 2609–2613.

[6] Liu Y, Shi CG, Wang XW, Chen HJ, Wang C, Cao P, et al. Timing of surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. International Orthopaedics. 2015; 39: 2457–2463.

[7] Lubelski D, Tharin S, Como JJ, Steinmetz MP, Vallier H, Moore T. Surgical timing for cervical and upper thoracic injuries in patients with polytrauma. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017; 27: 633–637.

[8] Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, W Cadotte D, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e32037.

[9] Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Aarabi B, et al. The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet Neurology. 2021; 20: 117–126.

[10] Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treat-ment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2016; 35: 5642–5655.

[11] Dvorak MF, Noonan VK, Fallah N, Fisher CG, Finkelstein J, Kwon BK, et al. The influence of time from injury to surgery on motor recovery and length of hospital stay in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: an observational Canadian cohort study. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2015; 32: 645–654.

[12] ter Wengel PV, De Witt Hamer PC, Pauptit JC, van der Gaag NA, Oner FC, Vandertop WP. Early Surgical Decompression Improves Neurological Outcome after Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2019; 36: 835–844.

[13] Jug M, Kejžar N, Vesel M, Al Mawed S, Dobravec M, Herman S, et al. Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury is Superior if Surgical Decompression and Instrumented Fusion are Performed within 8 Hours versus 8 to 24 Hours after Injury: a Single Center Experience. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2015; 32: 1385–1392.

[14] Mattiassich G, Gollwitzer M, Gaderer F, Blocher M, Osti M, Lill M, et al. Functional Outcomes in Individuals Undergoing very Early (<5 h) and Early (5–24 h) Surgical Decompression in Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Analysis of Neurological Improvement from the Austrian Spinal Cord Injury Study. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2017; 34: 3362–3371.

[15] Biglari B, Child C, Yildirim TM, Swing T, Reitzel T, Moghaddam A. Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury?Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2016; 12: 1339–1346.

[16] McKinley W, Meade MA, Kirshblum S, Barnard B. Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004; 85: 1818–1825.

[17] Guest J, Eleraky MA, Apostolides PJ, Dickman CA, Sonntag VKH. Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002; 97: 25–32.

[18] Mac-Thiong J, Feldman DE, Thompson C, Bourassa-Moreau E, Parent S. Does timing of surgery affect hospitalization costs and length of stay for acute care following a traumatic spinal cord injury? Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012; 29: 2816–2822.

[19] Qiu Y, Chen Y, Xie Y, Xie H, Dong J. Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies. International Journal of Surgery. 2021; 94: 106098.

[20] Casha S, Christie S. Systematic Review of Intensive Cardiopulmonary Management after Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2011; 28: 1479–1495.

[21] Cengiz EL, Kalkan E, Bayir A, Ilik K, Basefer A. Timing of thora-colomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. a real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2008; 128: 959–966.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time