Article Data

  • Views 2605
  • Dowloads 436

Original Research

Open Access

Mortality differences among patients with trauma based on systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure: insights from a generalized additive model diagram

  • Kyoungryul Lee1
  • Youdong Sohn1,*,
  • Taejin Park1
  • Youngsuk Cho1
  • Gyuchong Cho1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, 05355 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.170 Vol.21,Issue 11,November 2025 pp.45-54

Submitted: 22 January 2025 Accepted: 03 April 2025

Published: 08 November 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Youdong Sohn E-mail: medysohn@kdh.or.kr

Abstract

Background: Rapid recognition of shock in trauma patients is imperative for timely intervention and optimal outcomes. Conventional hemodynamic indices, such as systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP) and shock index (SI), are commonly used to predict mortality but often fall short in predictive performance when assessed individually. To overcome these limitations, we applied a generalized additive model (GAM) to examine the nonlinear interaction between SBP and PP in relation to mortality risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Seoul Golden Time Registry (2019–2022) of trauma patients transported to 10 hospitals in Seoul. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the mortality prediction by SBP, PP and SI; while no significant differences in survival prediction were observed among these indices, a notable correlation was found between SBP and SI. Consequently, a generalized additive model (GAM) was applied to evaluate the interaction between SBP and PP, with adjustment for confounding variables including age, sex and pre-hospital transport time. Results: A total of 62,680 out of 82,623 trauma patients were analyzed. ROC curve analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality prediction among SBP, PP and SI (SBP vs. PP, p = 0.8347; SBP vs. SI, p = 0.3077; PP vs. SI, p = 0.4433). GAM analysis identified a significant interaction between SBP and PP with adjusted confounding factors (p < 0.001). The interaction plot showed a bimodal relationship between SBP and mortality, with increased mortality risk associated with lower PP. Conclusions: The study confirms that the interaction between SBP and PP significantly affects mortality in trauma patients. These findings suggest that an integrated assessment of these hemodynamic indices may improve the early identification of high-risk trauma patients and optimize management decisions during pre-hospital and emergency care.


Keywords

Blood pressure; Pulse pressure; Trauma; Mortality


Cite and Share

Kyoungryul Lee,Youdong Sohn,Taejin Park,Youngsuk Cho,Gyuchong Cho. Mortality differences among patients with trauma based on systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure: insights from a generalized additive model diagram. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(11);45-54.

References

[1] Homan TD, Bordes SJ, Cichowski E. Physiology, pulse pressure. StatPearls Publishing LLC: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[2] Tisherman SA, Schmicker RH, Brasel KJ, Bulger EM, Kerby JD, Minei JP, et al. Detailed description of all deaths in both the shock and traumatic brain injury hypertonic saline trials of the resuscitation outcomes consortium. Annals of Surgery. 2015; 261: 586–590.

[3] Fiore PI, Monteleone AS, Muller J, Filardo G, Candrian C, Riegger M. The NACA score predicts mortality in polytrauma patients before hospital admission: a registry-based study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2024; 32: 116.

[4] Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. The Journal of Trauma. 2006; 60: S3–S11.

[5] ATLS Subcommittee; American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma; International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013; 74: 1363–1366.

[6] Deeb AP, Guyette FX, Daley BJ, Miller RS, Harbrecht BG, Claridge JA, et al. Time to early resuscitative intervention association with mortality in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhage. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2023; 94: 504–512.

[7] Mathew R, Fernando SM, Hu K, Parlow S, Di Santo P, Brodie D, et al. Optimal perfusion targets in cardiogenic shock. JACC: Advances. 2022; 1: 100034.

[8] Lee EP, Yen CW, Hsieh MS, Lin JJ, Chan OW, Su YT, et al. Diastolic blood pressure impact on pediatric refractory septic shock outcomes. Pediatrics & Neonatology. 2024; 65: 222–228.

[9] Chi CY, Tsai MS, Kuo LK, Hsu HH, Huang WC, Lai CH, et al. Post-resuscitation diastolic blood pressure is a prognostic factor for outcomes of cardiac arrest patients: a multicenter retrospective registry-based analysis. Journal of Intensive Care. 2022; 10: 39.

[10] Priestley EM, Inaba K, Byerly S, Biswas S, Wong MD, Lam L, et al. Pulse pressure as an early warning of hemorrhage in trauma patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2019; 229: 184–191.

[11] Rilinger J, Riefler AM, Bemtgen X, Jäckel M, Zotzmann V, Biever PM, et al. Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2021; 110: 1473–1483.

[12] Lee SH, Kim YJ, Yu GN, Jeon JC, Kim WY. Pulse pressure during the initial resuscitative period in patients with septic shock treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021; 36: 924–931.

[13] Qiu W, Xiao X, Cai A, Gao Z, Li L. Pulse pressure and all-cause mortality in ischaemic heart failure patients: a prospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine. 2022; 54: 2701–2709.

[14] Alcasid NJ, Banks KC, Susai CJ, Victorino GP. Early abnormal vital signs predict poor outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. Journal of Surgical Research. 2024; 295: 393–398.

[15] Pottecher J, Ageron FX, Fauche C, Chemla D, Noll E, Duranteau J, et al. Prehospital shock index and pulse pressure/heart rate ratio to predict massive transfusion after severe trauma: retrospective analysis of a large regional trauma database. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016; 81: 713–722.

[16] Gillebert TC. Pulse pressure and blood pressure components:. is the sum more than the parts? European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2018; 25: 457–459.

[17] Asim M, El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Consunji R, Siddiqui T, Kanbar A, et al. Time and risk factors of trauma-related mortality: a 5-year retrospective analysis from a national level I trauma center. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2024; 39: 672–682.

[18] Chien YC, Ko YC, Chiang WC, Sun JT, Shin SD, Tanaka H, et al. Modified physiologic criteria for the field triage scheme: efficacy of major trauma recognition in different age groups in Asia. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2024; 77: 147–153.

[19] Ghonem MM, Abdelnoor AA, Hodeib AA. Shock and modified shock indices in predicting poisoning severity and outcomes in acute aluminum phosphide poisoned patients. Toxicology Research. 2024; 13: tfad124.

[20] Yoo HH, Ro YS, Ko E, Lee JH, Han SH, Kim T, et al. Epidemiologic trends of patients who visited nationwide emergency departments: a report from the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) of Korea, 2018–2022. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine. 2023; 10: S1–S12.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top