Article Data

  • Views 3981
  • Dowloads 73

Original Research

Open Access

TAP and TAPA blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind study

  • Dilek Metin Yamaç1,*,
  • Yadigar Yılmaz1
  • Ayşın Ersoy2

1Department of Anesthesiology, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34668 Istanbul, Turkey

2Department of Anesthesia, Vocational School of Health Science, Istanbul Aydin University, 34295 Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.177 Vol.21,Issue 11,November 2025 pp.109-115

Submitted: 27 December 2024 Accepted: 29 May 2025

Published: 08 November 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Dilek Metin Yamaç E-mail: ddilekmetin@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have become increasingly important for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study compared the analgesic effects of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with the thoracoabdominal nerve block performed via a perichondral approach (TAPA) in LC patients. Methods: Sixty-one individuals scheduled for LC under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either a TAP or TAPA block. The duration of block administration was measured. Postoperative pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), tramadol requirements via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), additional rescue analgesic use, and side effects were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The primary endpoint was 24-h postoperative PCA bolus tramadol dose consumption. Results: The two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics (p > 0.05), though the TAP group included a higher proportion of male patients (p < 0.05). Performing the TAPA block required more time than TAP (p < 0.05). Tramadol consumption at the 12th hour was significantly lower in the TAPA group, whereas PCA use at other intervals, NRS scores, and rescue analgesic requirements did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Both TAP and TAPA blocks provided effective analgesia after LC. Considering their equivalent efficacy, TAP may be advantageous in clinical practice due to its single injection technique and easier application. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06768385.


Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Regional anesthesia; TAP block; TAPA block; Postoperative analgesia


Cite and Share

Dilek Metin Yamaç, Yadigar Yılmaz, Ayşın Ersoy. TAP and TAPA blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind study. Signa Vitae. 2025; 21(11): 109-115. doi: 10.22514/sv.2025.177

References

[1] Molfino S, Botteri E, Baggi P, Totaro L, Huscher M, Baiocchi GL, et al. Pain control in laparoscopic surgery: a case-control study between transversus abdominis plane-block and trocar-site anesthesia. Updates in Surgery. 2019; 71: 717–722.

[2] Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Roberts K, Kumar S, Vadivelu N. Pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a review of the current options. Pain Practice. 2012; 12: 485–496.

[3] Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain. 2001; 90: 261–269.

[4] Jindal S, Sidhu GK, Baryha GK, Singh B, Kumari S, Mahajan R. Comparison of efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in open cholecystectomy. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2020; 36: 371–376.

[5] Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, De Santo G, Aljedani N, Ortiz P, Gauger U, et al. Ultrasound-versus visual-guided transversus abdominis plane block prior to transabdominal preperitoneal ingunial hernia repair. A retrospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020; 59: 281–285.

[6] Karasu D, Yilmaz C, Ozgunay SE, Yalcin D, Ozkaya G. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. Northern Clinics of Istanbul. 2020; 8: 88–94.

[7] Ciftci B, Alici HA, Ansen G, Sakul BU, Tulgar S. Cadaveric investigation of the spread of the thoracoabdominal nerve block using the perichondral and modified perichondral approaches. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2022; 75: 357–359.

[8] Ertürk T, Ersoy A. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of the thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (TAPA) and modified TAPA for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Signa Vitae. 2022; 18: 114–120.

[9] Alsharari AF, Abuadas FH, Alnassrallah YS, Salihu D. Transversus abdominis plane block as a strategy for effective pain management in patients with pain during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 6896.

[10] Qi Q, Zhou Z, Qiao Y, Ren T, Yang B. Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for anesthetic effect in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2023; 102: e34517.

[11] Ferrari FA, Crestani B, Torroni L, Pavone M, Ferrari F, Bourdel N, et al. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2025; 32: 229–239.e3.

[12] Tekeli AE, Eker E, Bartin MK, Öner MÖ. The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases: a retrospective evaluation of 515 patients. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020; 48: 300060520944058.

[13] Tulgar S, Senturk O, Selvi O, Balaban O, Ahiskalioğlu A, Thomas DT, et al. Perichondral approach for blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves: anatomical basis and clinical experience in three cases. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019; 54: 8–10.

[14] Tulgar S, Selvi O, Thomas DT, Deveci U, Özer Z. Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in abdominal surgery and is a choice for opioid sparing anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019; 55: 109.

[15] Thurston KL, Zhang SJ, Wilbanks BA, Billings R, Aroke EN. A systematic review of race, sex, and socioeconomic status differences in postoperative pain and pain management. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2023; 38: 504–515.

[16] Athnaiel O, Cantillo S, Paredes S, Knezevic NN. The role of sex hormones in pain-related conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 1866.

[17] Oldman M, McCartney CJ, Leung A, Rawson R, Perlas A, Gadsden J, et al. A survey of orthopedic surgeons' attitudes and knowledge regarding regional anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004; 98: 1486–1490.

[18] Gürkan Y, Kamen V. Future of regional anaesthesia: “a block for everyone”. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2023; 51: 157–162.

[19] Oraee S, Rajai Firouzabadi S, Mohammadi I, Alinejadfard M, Golsorkh H, Hatami S. Erector spinae plane block for laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 389.

[20] Qin Y, Zhou X, Wu M, She H, Wu J. Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2025; 49: 204–218.

[21] Zeng J, Hong A, Gu Z, Jian J, Liang X. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2024; 24: 87.

[22] Nair P, Behera CR, Patra RK, Shekar N, Rao LS, Pujari P, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the non-TAP group. Cureus. 2022; 14: e32038.

[23] Scott LJ, Perry CM. Tramadol: a review of its use in perioperative pain. Drugs. 2000; 60: 139–1376.

[24] Baker WF, Mehta N, Riebesell SA, DeBernardis DA, Austin LS. Tramadol-based multimodal pain protocols after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are similarly effective as oxycodone-based protocols with fewer morphine milligram equivalents prescribed and lower risk of refills. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2025; 67: 126–131.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top